|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
|
| liberal N proud
|
Mon Oct-09-06 06:31 AM Original message |
| How convenient of Kim Jil Il to test a Nuke to divert attention for bu$h |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| |
| bowens43
|
Mon Oct-09-06 06:32 AM Response to Original message |
| 1. That's ridiculous. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| The Velveteen Ocelot
|
Mon Oct-09-06 06:34 AM Response to Original message |
| 2. Au contraire. This is really bad for Bush, not good. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| liberal N proud
|
Mon Oct-09-06 06:39 AM Response to Reply #2 |
| 4. I hope you are correct |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| KharmaTrain
|
Mon Oct-09-06 07:01 AM Response to Reply #2 |
| 15. That's A Great Barometer |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Midlodemocrat
|
Mon Oct-09-06 08:20 AM Response to Reply #2 |
| 24. Bush is such a fucking moran. He completely ignored NK |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HereSince1628
|
Mon Oct-09-06 06:38 AM Response to Original message |
| 3. This is a strategic failure of *'s policy against the Axis of Evil |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Deja Q
|
Mon Oct-09-06 06:40 AM Response to Reply #3 |
| 6. Strategy as we know it... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| liberal N proud
|
Mon Oct-09-06 06:42 AM Response to Reply #3 |
| 7. Bu$h could use this to spin the expedited attack on Iran as well |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HereSince1628
|
Mon Oct-09-06 07:05 AM Response to Reply #7 |
| 16. Sure ..under Principles of Bullying Behavior 101 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Deja Q
|
Mon Oct-09-06 06:40 AM Response to Original message |
| 5. The media latches on to every little thing and milks it until |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| pretzel4gore
|
Mon Oct-09-06 06:59 AM Response to Reply #5 |
| 14. c'mon HynoToad; NK doesn't want us dead. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bluestateguy
|
Mon Oct-09-06 06:43 AM Response to Original message |
| 8. That's not a conspiracy theory that I will take seriously |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Bucky
|
Mon Oct-09-06 06:43 AM Response to Original message |
| 9. A huge security failure on the heels of a GOP sex scandal. Clever Rove! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DemocratSinceBirth
|
Mon Oct-09-06 06:45 AM Response to Original message |
| 10. We Need To Stop Fearing Bush... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| hlthe2b
|
Mon Oct-09-06 06:46 AM Response to Original message |
| 11. Come again? This is a TREMENDOUS Bush* failure... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Warpy
|
Mon Oct-09-06 06:56 AM Response to Original message |
| 12. This is a DISASTER for this administration |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DemocratSinceBirth
|
Mon Oct-09-06 06:57 AM Response to Reply #12 |
| 13. Their Spin Is Always The Same... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hav
|
Mon Oct-09-06 07:23 AM Response to Original message |
| 17. . |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| alcibiades_mystery
|
Mon Oct-09-06 07:24 AM Response to Original message |
| 18. You really can't be that paranoid, can you? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Chomp
|
Mon Oct-09-06 07:26 AM Response to Original message |
| 19. Sorry OP, nonsense |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| madinmaryland
|
Mon Oct-09-06 07:27 AM Response to Original message |
| 20. What the hell are you talking about? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| shadow 99
|
Mon Oct-09-06 07:28 AM Response to Original message |
| 21. Just another world fruit cake saying "Pay attention to me". |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| PSPS
|
Mon Oct-09-06 08:07 AM Response to Original message |
| 22. It's all up to the MSM |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| City Lights
|
Mon Oct-09-06 08:16 AM Response to Original message |
| 23. Chalk this up as another chimp failure. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 19th 2013, 08:50 PM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC