Jerkoff repub kingston wants Pelosi under oath for 'sitting on' emails

[Philosoraptor]

On chris wallace's propaganda show, suggests that the Democrats 'sat on' this info right before the election to make the pubs look bad.

what a fucking jerkoff

[proud2BlibKansan]

1. They claim to be the party of high morals and family values

I want to know when taking responsibility stopped being a family value.

[madokie]

15. To them, responsibility was never a high moral or a family value

they only played lip service to it. graft and corruption is their forte

[whistle]

2. Ok, but then Hastert and all of the other repukes involved should

...be subjected to polygraphs

[Epiphany4z]

3. well gee how long where they

planning to sit on it?...I am so sure repubs let a Dem know this shit was going on...half the republicans say they didn't know...but of course they ran and blabbed it a top Dem...ok...

[rodeodance]

4. I have not heard anything about Pelosi holding/sitting --Is this a new

talking point?

[MiniMe]

18. Its desperation. They want to tie the dems into this.

Good Luck.

[hobbit709]

5. Put all 435 of them under oath

and a lie detector.

[C_U_L8R]

6. all the republicans have left are lies

it;s pathetic.... but true

everyone stand back and watch...
this ain't gonna be pretty.

[Hav]

7. .

I'm a little bit amused that it's always about Pelosi, Pelosi, Pelosi the last days. They are sooo scared that for some reason, they have to attack here again and again. She is their (new?) boogeyman. Interesting.
Oh how great it will be if the Dems win back the House and the Senate. Give them hell!

[SoFlaJet]

8. and this from the party

that authorized 70 million to be spent on investigating Bill Clinton getting his knob waxed and polished-but THEY would NEVER play politics...Jack Kingston is a dumb yokel

[seabeyond]

9. they were out a year ago to media, wouldnt effect nov election

they were given to crew in summer, wouldnt have effected election.

and these were given to writer in aug. wouldnt have effect nov and not na oct surprise

nothing about this can suggest it was given up for it to be revealed in oct. everything suggest someone was trying to get it explored a year ago

[symbolman]

10. Time to trot out Ted Stevens

who GROWLED and SPIT when, I think it was Waxman, who wanted ALL THOSE OIL EXECS who appeared before Congress put under Oath, and REFUSED to do it..

Put them Oil Execs Under Oath and we've got a deal asshole

This may be Proof that she's going to be in charge soon, they are PRE-Propagandizing, PRE-Slandering Her, warming up for the constant assault on the Dems as the LEADING PARTY

[DoYouEverWonder]

11. Fine investigate Pelosi and anyone else you want

They have nothing to do with the Foley scandal and nothing to hide. But first we should investigate Hastert and the rest who were directly involved and have covered up for Foley from anywhere from 1 to 10 years.

[HereSince1628]

12. I believe people see it for what it is...an attempt to soil the Dems

with the mud the R's have been rolling in. Mudslinging is what you do for mitigation when you can't deny and ignore.

Anyone can make accusations and call for responses---and try to make something of it when they get ignored by the target. That's all this is.

[Buzz Clik]

13. Ignore the bullshit: Hastert could have derailed this years ago.

Let's assume this is absolutely true. If the GOP had taken proper action against Foley when they first knew of his antics, then we would not be talking of this today.

[vixengrl]

17. Totally. It was up to the Repugs to pick their timing--

they didn't--sucks to be them.

[populistdriven]

14. truth is the FBI sat on it - they should blame them

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

[helderheid]

16. Pelosi had nothing to do with the emails. that would be Foley. Crazy mofo

[brook]

19. Kingston and McHenry

must've drawn the short straws. They've been out on the 'newsroad' hawking their rovian talking points for the last 24 hours. Thing is, they've yet to make a sale. They're both malevolent and pathetic in their roles.

[Mayberry Machiavelli]

20. Is Kingston another junior congressman who can be thrown under the bus?

Sacrificed for the greater good of the Republican Hive Mind?

Democrats need a consistent, brief response to this ("burden is not on us, no evidence whatsoever of this charge, get Foley and Hastert under oath first) though.

[brook]

21. 7 terms so far...

"How can I intern for Congressman Kingston?".

[JerseygirlCT]

22. Where's the proof?

Right now, these are charges based on a wish. I certainly wouldn't be subjecting myself to questioning when they've got NOTHING. This wouldn't hold in any court.

Look, if this were held for any significant length of time by some Dems as well as the GOP, then I say bury them, too. Kids' welfare is at stake -- that's more important.

But to date, all we've got are wild and baseless accusations intended to distract from the real crime and the truly guilty.