Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jerkoff repub kingston wants Pelosi under oath for 'sitting on' emails

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-08-06 08:11 AM
Original message
Jerkoff repub kingston wants Pelosi under oath for 'sitting on' emails
On chris wallace's propaganda show, suggests that the Democrats 'sat on' this info right before the election to make the pubs look bad.

what a fucking jerkoff
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-08-06 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. They claim to be the party of high morals and family values
I want to know when taking responsibility stopped being a family value.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-08-06 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. To them, responsibility was never a high moral or a family value
they only played lip service to it. graft and corruption is their forte
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-08-06 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. Ok, but then Hastert and all of the other repukes involved should
...be subjected to polygraphs :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Epiphany4z Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-08-06 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. well gee how long where they
planning to sit on it?...I am so sure repubs let a Dem know this shit was going on...half the republicans say they didn't know...but of course they ran and blabbed it a top Dem...ok...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-08-06 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. I have not heard anything about Pelosi holding/sitting --Is this a new
talking point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-08-06 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
18. Its desperation. They want to tie the dems into this.
Good Luck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-08-06 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
5. Put all 435 of them under oath
and a lie detector.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-08-06 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
6. all the republicans have left are lies
it;s pathetic.... but true

everyone stand back and watch...
this ain't gonna be pretty.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hav Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-08-06 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
7. .
I'm a little bit amused that it's always about Pelosi, Pelosi, Pelosi the last days. They are sooo scared that for some reason, they have to attack here again and again. She is their (new?) boogeyman. Interesting.
Oh how great it will be if the Dems win back the House and the Senate. Give them hell!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-08-06 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
8. and this from the party
that authorized 70 million to be spent on investigating Bill Clinton getting his knob waxed and polished-but THEY would NEVER play politics...Jack Kingston is a dumb yokel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-08-06 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
9. they were out a year ago to media, wouldnt effect nov election
they were given to crew in summer, wouldnt have effected election.

and these were given to writer in aug. wouldnt have effect nov and not na oct surprise

nothing about this can suggest it was given up for it to be revealed in oct. everything suggest someone was trying to get it explored a year ago
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-08-06 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
10. Time to trot out Ted Stevens
who GROWLED and SPIT when, I think it was Waxman, who wanted ALL THOSE OIL EXECS who appeared before Congress put under Oath, and REFUSED to do it..

Put them Oil Execs Under Oath and we've got a deal asshole :)

This may be Proof that she's going to be in charge soon, they are PRE-Propagandizing, PRE-Slandering Her, warming up for the constant assault on the Dems as the LEADING PARTY :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-08-06 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
11. Fine investigate Pelosi and anyone else you want
Edited on Sun Oct-08-06 08:29 AM by DoYouEverWonder
They have nothing to do with the Foley scandal and nothing to hide. But first we should investigate Hastert and the rest who were directly involved and have covered up for Foley from anywhere from 1 to 10 years.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-08-06 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
12. I believe people see it for what it is...an attempt to soil the Dems
with the mud the R's have been rolling in. Mudslinging is what you do for mitigation when you can't deny and ignore.

Anyone can make accusations and call for responses---and try to make something of it when they get ignored by the target. That's all this is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-08-06 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
13. Ignore the bullshit: Hastert could have derailed this years ago.
Let's assume this is absolutely true. If the GOP had taken proper action against Foley when they first knew of his antics, then we would not be talking of this today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vixengrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-08-06 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Totally. It was up to the Repugs to pick their timing--
they didn't--sucks to be them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
populistdriven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-08-06 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
14. truth is the FBI sat on it - they should blame them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-08-06 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
16. Pelosi had nothing to do with the emails. that would be Foley. Crazy mofo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-08-06 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
19. Kingston and McHenry
must've drawn the short straws. They've been out on the 'newsroad' hawking their rovian talking points for the last 24 hours. Thing is, they've yet to make a sale. They're both malevolent and pathetic in their roles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-08-06 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Is Kingston another junior congressman who can be thrown under the bus?
Sacrificed for the greater good of the Republican Hive Mind?

Democrats need a consistent, brief response to this ("burden is not on us, no evidence whatsoever of this charge, get Foley and Hastert under oath first) though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-08-06 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. 7 terms so far...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-08-06 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
22. Where's the proof?
Right now, these are charges based on a wish. I certainly wouldn't be subjecting myself to questioning when they've got NOTHING. This wouldn't hold in any court.

Look, if this were held for any significant length of time by some Dems as well as the GOP, then I say bury them, too. Kids' welfare is at stake -- that's more important.

But to date, all we've got are wild and baseless accusations intended to distract from the real crime and the truly guilty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Oct 24th 2014, 05:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC