|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Rosco T. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-06-06 07:02 PM Original message |
Foleygate IS A DISTRACTION... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
razors edge (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-06-06 07:05 PM Response to Original message |
1. I would not be suprised |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mayberry Machiavelli (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-06-06 07:08 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. No way would these guys give up a whole "safe" Repub seat for one of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-06-06 07:13 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Exactly. In fact, it was that reluctance to lose the seat that lead to the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dorkulon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-06-06 07:50 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. "safe seat" means SAFE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
razors edge (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-06-06 07:28 PM Response to Reply #2 |
12. so they wouldn't give up one seat in the congress, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mayberry Machiavelli (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-06-06 08:10 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Before the scandal got out, where was evidence they'd lost control of it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
razors edge (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-06-06 08:57 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. had to rethink |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lvx35 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-06-06 07:09 PM Response to Original message |
3. I agree, but I don't know that it was planned. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-06-06 07:10 PM Response to Original message |
4. I believe it's beginning to look that way, a distraction of Iraq war news |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tuvor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-06-06 07:11 PM Response to Original message |
5. Better Foley than a pretty missing blonde. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cooley Hurd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-06-06 07:13 PM Response to Original message |
6. If so, then it's the worst distraction ever... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Land Shark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-06-06 07:15 PM Response to Original message |
8. Above all, a distraction from Torture and Suspension of Habeas corpus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-06-06 07:18 PM Response to Original message |
9. Yeah, and could we have a few more distractions, please? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MazeRat7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-06-06 07:20 PM Response to Original message |
10. For intelligent people maybe... but the masses eat this crap up.... (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dorkulon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-06-06 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
11. Jesus guys... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-06-06 09:03 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. Agreed... as sad as it is, a sex scandal is more important |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Disturbed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-06-06 09:15 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. If it garners the Senate and the House for Dems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iconoclastic cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-06-06 07:54 PM Response to Original message |
14. But it's a natural, unplanned distraction, not a conspiracy. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:56 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC