Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iranian official: UN sanctions may lead us to seal off Persian Gulf

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 10:26 PM
Original message
Iranian official: UN sanctions may lead us to seal off Persian Gulf
A senior Iranian official threatened that Tehran may forcibly prevent oil export via the Straits of Hormuz if the UN imposed economic sanctions due to Iran's nuclear program, an Iranian news Web site said on Monday.

This is the first time an Iranian official makes military threats in a public statement on Tehran's recent disagreements with the West.

The news site, affiliated with the radical student movement in which President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was once a member, quoted Mohammed-Nabi Rudaki, deputy chairman of the Iranian parliament's National Security and Foreign Policy Commission.
According to the report, Rudaki said that "if Europe does not act wisely with the Iranian nuclear portfolio and it is referred to the UN Security Council and economic or air travel restrictions are imposed unjustly, we have the power to halt oil supply to the last drop from the shores of the Persian Gulf via the Straits of Hormuz."
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/674159.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Am I understanding this correctly?
The Iranian Navy is going to try the U.S of A?

First, :rofl:

Second, are they out of their minds?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tatertop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Why couldn't they sink their own ships in that lane
And mine the hell out of it.
I think they are ready for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. They could, I suppose.
Except for the U.S. Navy ships already patroling the area.

Have you considered this is another instance of chest-beating to inflame the masses? Drum up more biz for the "evildoers" so to speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tatertop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Possibly. Seems to me Iran must have detailed battle plans by now
I don't want to find out what those are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Iran has Russian Sunburn missiles.
Edited on Tue Jan-24-06 10:52 PM by Mika
I seem to remember reading that here on DU. There is no defense against Sunburns.


On edit:

Uh oh, seems that they do link

:scared:

:nuke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tatertop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. So goes the scuttlebutt
I fear we are going to find that out pretty soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ouabache Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. yep, and then fire shore to surface missles at any attempt to clear it
Of course blivet* will use it as an excuse to nuke them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spoon Donating Member (401 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. Jsut last night I was thinking about various ways the Iran conflict could
Edited on Tue Jan-24-06 10:48 PM by Spoon
go hot, and f'n with ships in the Gulf was at the top of the list. Operation Praying Mantis (Gulf, 1988) comes to mind:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Praying_Mantis
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. They'd be destroyed...
This is not an endorsement of any crazy warmongering. It's just that we have the best military in the world, and the Chimp in Charge has no qualms about using them. Unless of course, they actually have nuclear capabilities, in which case, he'll be a blowhard about it like he is with N. Korea.


Wikipedia says, "The attack by the U.S. may have helped pressure Iran to agree to a ceasefire..."

Probably.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spoon Donating Member (401 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. My thoughts are that an excuse would be needed to justify an
escalation, and what more predictable reason could there be but the "sanctions, response, response" angle that has started so many other wars...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC