jefferson_dem
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 12:57 PM
Original message |
| Rangel: An attack on (CHIMPY) is an attack on all Americans... |
 |
Edited on Thu Sep-21-06 01:27 PM by jefferson_dem
REP. RANGEL BLASTS CHAVEZ: DON'T COME TO MY COUNTRY AND ATTACK MY PRESIDENT... 'You do not come into my country, my congressional district, and you do not condemn my president. If there is any criticism of President Bush, it should be restricted to Americans, whether they voted for him or not. I just want to make it abundantly clear to Hugo Chavez or any other president, but do not come to the United States and think because we have problems with our president that any foreigner can come to our country and not think that Americans do not feel offended when you offend our Chief of State'... VIDEO LINK -- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eX1lBOxoJeU
|

Oh brother |
Moochy |
Sep-21-06 01:02 PM |
#1 |
 
Rangel is only talking about other presidents or heads of state. |
oncall247 |
Sep-21-06 05:20 PM |
#214 |

then tell your president to stop trying to overthrow |
xchrom |
Sep-21-06 01:03 PM |
#2 |

uh... what? |
DireStrike |
Sep-21-06 01:03 PM |
#3 |
 
Maybe... |
Bornaginhooligan |
Sep-21-06 01:05 PM |
#9 |

Oh Like every other Chavez Basher around here ? |
Moochy |
Sep-21-06 01:07 PM |
#10 |

... |
Bornaginhooligan |
Sep-21-06 01:03 PM |
#4 |

He thinks the draft would be a fine idea too |
NNN0LHI |
Sep-21-06 01:04 PM |
#5 |
 
Good Point. n/t |
OhioChick |
Sep-21-06 01:15 PM |
#24 |
 
that he needs to switch parties! |
RandiRhodesArchives |
Sep-21-06 02:09 PM |
#123 |
 
you know why he says that don't you? |
nini |
Sep-21-06 07:47 PM |
#233 |

Attack? |
malaise |
Sep-21-06 01:04 PM |
#6 |

Umm, I didn't feel attacked.. |
ananda |
Sep-21-06 01:04 PM |
#7 |

when that president represents an immediate threat to world peace . . . |
OneBlueSky |
Sep-21-06 01:04 PM |
#8 |

I don't agree with it, but it's politically astute |
greenman3610 |
Sep-21-06 01:07 PM |
#11 |

Evil translates into many languages. |
Generic Other |
Sep-21-06 01:08 PM |
#12 |

Here |
feduppuke |
Sep-21-06 01:09 PM |
# |

Deleted message |
Name removed |
Sep-21-06 01:09 PM |
#13 |
 
Bullshit. |
cali |
Sep-21-06 01:21 PM |
#31 |
  
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Sep-21-06 01:23 PM |
#36 |
 
spoken like a true progressive |
onenote |
Sep-21-06 02:27 PM |
#163 |
 
Zing!! |
Rex |
Sep-21-06 02:40 PM |
#184 |
 
Oh Carlos Whoops I Mean Onenote |
Binka |
Sep-21-06 08:04 PM |
#237 |
 
Charlie Rangel has done more in his sleep for progressive |
geek tragedy |
Sep-21-06 01:33 PM |
#54 |
  
Well then he can go and goosestep with his new best friend |
Rex |
Sep-21-06 01:36 PM |
#60 |
   
well said |
leftchick |
Sep-21-06 01:39 PM |
#63 |
    
Wasnt his call for the draft a kind of "dare" |
Moochy |
Sep-21-06 01:43 PM |
#71 |
     
sadly no. Mr. rangel is dead serious |
leftchick |
Sep-21-06 02:08 PM |
#121 |
    
If there were a draft, the support for rushing into a ground war would be |
NYCGirl |
Sep-21-06 02:16 PM |
#138 |
     
Yet a draft, |
Totallybushed |
Sep-21-06 04:42 PM |
#212 |
    
(OT) You're off about LBJ. Think Voting Rights Act, Medicare, |
pinto |
Sep-21-06 08:47 PM |
#247 |
    
In fairness, he was trying to even the playing field |
Spearman87 |
Sep-21-06 02:16 PM |
#139 |
    
That was my impression at the time as well |
Moochy |
Sep-21-06 02:27 PM |
#164 |
     
Mine also. Knee-jerk reactions prevent some from thinking things through |
AZBlue |
Sep-21-06 08:20 PM |
#240 |
    
Calling for a DRAFT was indeed PROGRESSIVE, |
bvar22 |
Sep-21-06 09:08 PM |
#250 |
    
I don't care what he was trying to do |
leftchick |
Sep-21-06 02:36 PM |
#179 |
    
But but but, he has a D next to his name! |
Rex |
Sep-21-06 02:41 PM |
#186 |
     
the vast majority of Ds |
leftchick |
Sep-21-06 02:45 PM |
#188 |
    
Now stop that! You cannot call the Ds, Rs! It will bring about our |
Rex |
Sep-21-06 03:04 PM |
#206 |
    
Think about it this way: The French are pretty slow |
Spearman87 |
Sep-21-06 02:53 PM |
#194 |
    
Hey! How about this compromise! |
Spearman87 |
Sep-21-06 03:06 PM |
#207 |
    
Thanks, some people just cannot live outside a black and white |
Rex |
Sep-21-06 01:44 PM |
#75 |
   
Okay, this place has become a looney bin. |
geek tragedy |
Sep-21-06 01:42 PM |
#69 |
  
Same here. |
Rex |
Sep-21-06 01:43 PM |
#72 |
  
100% Correct! |
BIG Sean |
Sep-21-06 02:56 PM |
#197 |
  
Then he should spend more time sleeping. |
KaptBunnyPants |
Sep-21-06 07:32 PM |
#224 |
 
It's a brilliant move. |
cigsandcoffee |
Sep-21-06 07:31 PM |
#223 |

He wasn't INSIDE the country. |
Tyler Durden |
Sep-21-06 01:09 PM |
#14 |
 
Rangel traidor? |
El Zopilote |
Sep-21-06 01:26 PM |
#41 |

Deleted message |
Name removed |
Sep-21-06 08:14 PM |
#238 |

Well maybe the United Nations should move to a friendlier country |
undeterred |
Sep-21-06 01:09 PM |
#15 |
 
UN Is Considered International Territory and.... |
otohara |
Sep-21-06 01:20 PM |
#30 |
  
Bush doesn't like conventions in Geneva |
Bad Penny |
Sep-21-06 02:12 PM |
#129 |
 
ROTLF at that graphic! Good one! |
treestar |
Sep-21-06 02:21 PM |
#152 |
 
Chavez Said The Same Thing....He Proposed.... |
otohara |
Sep-21-06 01:35 PM |
#57 |

I wonder what Chavez's new friend will say about this? |
Freddie Stubbs |
Sep-21-06 01:11 PM |
#16 |
 
That is proof that Muslims and Christians can get along just dandy |
NNN0LHI |
Sep-21-06 01:12 PM |
#19 |

Very nice. |
Rex |
Sep-21-06 01:14 PM |
#21 |

Does Ahmadinejad promote a religion of peace? |
Freddie Stubbs |
Sep-21-06 01:19 PM |
#28 |
 
Why don't you ask the Pope. |
Rex |
Sep-21-06 01:24 PM |
#39 |

Daaaamn, boyyyy! |
Bornaginhooligan |
Sep-21-06 01:26 PM |
#43 |

When has the Pope encouraged violence? |
Freddie Stubbs |
Sep-21-06 01:32 PM |
#51 |
 
When he called a billion people evil and inhuman. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Sep-21-06 01:34 PM |
#56 |
  
Who did he call inhuman? |
Freddie Stubbs |
Sep-21-06 01:37 PM |
#61 |
   
muslims. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Sep-21-06 01:38 PM |
#62 |
  
Can you please provide the quote where he calls muslims inhuman or |
Freddie Stubbs |
Sep-21-06 01:43 PM |
#73 |
  
But you are aware of them. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Sep-21-06 01:44 PM |
#74 |
   
He must have missed the huge apology from the Pope. |
Rex |
Sep-21-06 01:47 PM |
#78 |
    
He apologized for advocating violence? |
Freddie Stubbs |
Sep-21-06 01:48 PM |
#81 |
     
Yes. |
Rex |
Sep-21-06 01:50 PM |
#84 |
    
People say a lot of things that they need to take back |
Freddie Stubbs |
Sep-21-06 01:51 PM |
#86 |
    
Really? You mean like the Pope? |
Rex |
Sep-21-06 01:53 PM |
#89 |
    
But they don't all advocate violence against groups of people |
Freddie Stubbs |
Sep-21-06 02:00 PM |
#105 |
    
Well then he should have never apologized if he really was |
Rex |
Sep-21-06 02:03 PM |
#111 |
    
Kucinich apologized to the NAACP |
Freddie Stubbs |
Sep-21-06 02:11 PM |
#127 |
    
So Dennis apologized for missing a meeting, but the Pope apologized |
Rex |
Sep-21-06 02:14 PM |
#134 |
    
Still looking for that qoute inciting violence? |
Freddie Stubbs |
Sep-21-06 02:16 PM |
#140 |
    
Sure |
Rex |
Sep-21-06 02:18 PM |
#145 |
    
Gee Fred Is Still Licking The Lost Stamp |
Binka |
Sep-21-06 08:18 PM |
#239 |
    
The Pope did NOT ever apologize for *the content* - he should resign n/t |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-21-06 03:03 PM |
#204 |
   
I am not aware of any statements of the Pope advocating violence or |
Freddie Stubbs |
Sep-21-06 01:47 PM |
#80 |
  
Yes. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Sep-21-06 01:48 PM |
#83 |
  
Can you provide a link to these statements advocating violence? |
Freddie Stubbs |
Sep-21-06 01:50 PM |
#85 |
  
Well, if you want. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Sep-21-06 01:55 PM |
#96 |
   
That's so sad. |
Rex |
Sep-21-06 01:59 PM |
#104 |
   
I see no call to violence in that |
Freddie Stubbs |
Sep-21-06 02:03 PM |
#109 |
  
Uh huh. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Sep-21-06 02:04 PM |
#114 |
  
Did he ever apologize for his remarks? |
Rex |
Sep-21-06 02:06 PM |
#116 |
  
Nope. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Sep-21-06 03:28 PM |
#209 |
  
have you heard of this new thing called "google" |
datasuspect |
Sep-21-06 02:21 PM |
#149 |
  
He can only type in three words, if nothing comes up then all is good |
Rex |
Sep-21-06 02:23 PM |
#154 |
  
Google search for "pope advocated violence" yeilds no results |
Freddie Stubbs |
Sep-21-06 02:23 PM |
#155 |
  
Then neither should you. |
treestar |
Sep-21-06 02:24 PM |
#160 |
  
Dayum! |
Rex |
Sep-21-06 01:41 PM |
#68 |
 
Did you miss his apology the other day? |
Rex |
Sep-21-06 01:42 PM |
#70 |

That wasn't the question |
Freddie Stubbs |
Sep-21-06 01:45 PM |
#76 |

I just told you. |
Rex |
Sep-21-06 01:46 PM |
#77 |

But you haven't been able to provide any proof that he advocated violence |
Freddie Stubbs |
Sep-21-06 01:52 PM |
#88 |
 
It was in the news, I am very sorry if you missed it. |
Rex |
Sep-21-06 01:53 PM |
#92 |

Yes, but nothing come up when you search "pope advocated violence" |
Freddie Stubbs |
Sep-21-06 01:56 PM |
#100 |

That's because you worded it incorrectly. |
Rex |
Sep-21-06 01:58 PM |
#102 |

Thess google search yeilds some documents: |
Freddie Stubbs |
Sep-21-06 02:32 PM |
#175 |

LOL |
Rex |
Sep-21-06 02:35 PM |
#178 |

maybe because it is so far away from accurate |
hfojvt |
Sep-21-06 01:59 PM |
#103 |

LOL. Pope/Catholic haters, thanks for playing. |
Rex |
Sep-21-06 02:02 PM |
#107 |
 
LOL, the 'willful ignorance' meme |
hfojvt |
Sep-21-06 02:31 PM |
#173 |

Well of course you don't. |
Rex |
Sep-21-06 02:39 PM |
#183 |

okay, maybe it is just a talking point |
hfojvt |
Sep-21-06 02:49 PM |
#191 |

Zing!!! |
Rex |
Sep-21-06 02:52 PM |
#193 |

Well, that's the thing, isn't it? |
Bornaginhooligan |
Sep-21-06 02:03 PM |
#110 |

this whole business of 'pretend' is kinda confusing |
hfojvt |
Sep-21-06 02:46 PM |
#189 |

We are laughing at you (pope haters), did you not get it? |
Rex |
Sep-21-06 02:56 PM |
#196 |

Deleted message |
Name removed |
Sep-21-06 03:45 PM |
#210 |

Yeah the second one. |
Rex |
Sep-21-06 05:29 PM |
#216 |

But He Hoped It Wasn't True |
Binka |
Sep-21-06 08:30 PM |
#241 |

Nicely done! |
KaptBunnyPants |
Sep-21-06 07:33 PM |
#225 |

Sure. As long as they both hate the U.S. |
dbaker41 |
Sep-21-06 02:22 PM |
#153 |

they don't hate the US |
SlavesandBulldozers |
Sep-21-06 07:35 PM |
#226 |

Chavez may be a loon, but he has just as much right to criticize Bush as |
Caution |
Sep-21-06 01:11 PM |
#17 |
 
Right wing shill corporatist freeper conservative |
Moochy |
Sep-21-06 01:18 PM |
#27 |

That didn't take long now did it :) |
Caution |
Sep-21-06 01:26 PM |
#42 |

Always happy to oblige :-) |
Moochy |
Sep-21-06 01:40 PM |
#65 |

Gawd I Love You |
Binka |
Sep-21-06 08:37 PM |
#243 |

Flame me if you want but I actually agree with Rangel |
Godlesscommieprevert |
Sep-21-06 01:12 PM |
#18 |
 
um nice screen name. |
Moochy |
Sep-21-06 01:13 PM |
#20 |
  
Holy Shit |
Binka |
Sep-21-06 08:42 PM |
#245 |
 
I wasn't offended by Chavez's remark. But I have no problem with Rangel's |
BurtWorm |
Sep-21-06 01:15 PM |
#23 |
  
I'm in the same boat |
maddezmom |
Sep-21-06 01:27 PM |
#45 |
   
I feel lucky. |
BurtWorm |
Sep-21-06 01:33 PM |
#53 |
  
Rangel is an astute guy. |
Gormy Cuss |
Sep-21-06 01:28 PM |
#46 |
  
He would still be an asshole in my book |
dkofos |
Sep-21-06 01:32 PM |
#50 |
 
Actually, if Santorum suddenly called Bush "diablo" |
BurtWorm |
Sep-21-06 01:34 PM |
#55 |
 
Yeah, yeah |
KingFlorez |
Sep-21-06 01:21 PM |
# |
 
dupe |
KingFlorez |
Sep-21-06 01:21 PM |
#32 |
 
dupe |
KingFlorez |
Sep-21-06 01:21 PM |
#33 |
 
Read The Whole Speech |
otohara |
Sep-21-06 01:31 PM |
#49 |
 
First Flame: we are not equated, Chavez even distinguished |
treestar |
Sep-21-06 02:27 PM |
#165 |
 
Hear Hear And Bravo To Ya. I Agree With You Completely. |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME |
Sep-21-06 07:42 PM |
# |
 
Tell him, Charlie! "Chavez, you leave our idiot alone!!" |
No Exit |
Sep-21-06 08:38 PM |
#244 |

Deleted message |
Name removed |
Sep-21-06 01:14 PM |
#22 |
 
EnviroBat? |
zidzi |
Sep-21-06 02:21 PM |
#150 |

This is the way things used to work. |
Bleachers7 |
Sep-21-06 01:17 PM |
#25 |
 
that was back when Presidents made the attempt |
hfojvt |
Sep-21-06 01:48 PM |
#82 |

Oh Charlie |
otohara |
Sep-21-06 01:18 PM |
#26 |

Tell you what, Mr. Rangel: |
michael_1166 |
Sep-21-06 01:20 PM |
#29 |
 
OMG |
windbreeze |
Sep-21-06 01:33 PM |
#52 |

Mexico, Viet Nam, Brazil and especially China |
treestar |
Sep-21-06 02:30 PM |
#170 |

I am glad he said it, and Rangel does not speak for me |
Annces |
Sep-21-06 01:23 PM |
#34 |

Same old gutless Democrats. |
Sentinel Chicken |
Sep-21-06 01:23 PM |
#35 |

Deleted message |
Name removed |
Sep-21-06 01:24 PM |
#37 |

oh, so * represents Rangel??? |
windbreeze |
Sep-21-06 01:24 PM |
#38 |

Free Speech is free speech |
dkofos |
Sep-21-06 01:25 PM |
#40 |

Hey if our own dems had stood up before the Iraq war and |
go west young man |
Sep-21-06 01:27 PM |
#44 |

Rangel's Attack on Chavez, is proof US is doomed- freedom of |
Bluerthanblue |
Sep-21-06 01:28 PM |
#47 |
 
Rangel, Pelosi et al |
malaise |
Sep-21-06 01:40 PM |
#67 |
  
at some point do we not need to put |
Bluerthanblue |
Sep-21-06 01:51 PM |
#87 |
   
How many days to the election again |
malaise |
Sep-21-06 02:30 PM |
#171 |
   
How can you possibly know |
sufrommich |
Sep-21-06 05:29 PM |
#215 |
  
Democrat Bashing Mob? Disgusted? |
Binka |
Sep-21-06 08:52 PM |
#249 |
  
Malaise is right and Pelosi and Rangel know the Republicans will try hard |
KatieW |
Sep-21-06 02:18 PM |
#143 |
 
harumph. and Pelosi called Chavez a 'thug'... |
QuestionAll... |
Sep-21-06 01:47 PM |
#79 |
  
united corporations of america- |
Bluerthanblue |
Sep-21-06 01:56 PM |
#99 |
  
sorry, but Hugo Chavez definitely does not "represent" me |
onenote |
Sep-21-06 02:38 PM |
#181 |
 
well, hate to point this out but bush does, like it or not- |
Bluerthanblue |
Sep-21-06 04:10 PM |
#211 |
 
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Sep-21-06 01:55 PM |
#97 |

lots of rolled over and dead americans... |
QuestionAll... |
Sep-21-06 02:03 PM |
#113 |

no, actually he is a |
Bluerthanblue |
Sep-21-06 02:04 PM |
#115 |

RAWR Beat that chest you blue blooded amurrikkkan! |
Moochy |
Sep-21-06 02:13 PM |
#133 |

Deleted message |
Name removed |
Sep-21-06 02:15 PM |
#137 |

if * loves this country |
Bluerthanblue |
Sep-21-06 02:23 PM |
#156 |

You know, none of us here could possibly hate this country |
Skidmore |
Sep-21-06 02:26 PM |
#162 |

It isn't Chavez who is the head of the cabal robbing our nation blind. |
Book Lover |
Sep-21-06 01:29 PM |
#48 |

I thought he said this at the UN -- or am I mistaken? |
LostinVA |
Sep-21-06 01:35 PM |
#58 |

This is rich: |
verse18 |
Sep-21-06 01:36 PM |
#59 |
 
Not to mention that he can hardly expect that criticism of any president |
treestar |
Sep-21-06 02:35 PM |
#177 |

Rangle should have taken the same stance as the WH and Bolton |
Jeanette in FL |
Sep-21-06 01:40 PM |
#64 |

Bullshit! Fucking chimp doesn't |
zidzi |
Sep-21-06 01:40 PM |
#66 |
 
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Sep-21-06 01:53 PM |
#91 |

Deleted message |
Name removed |
Sep-21-06 01:55 PM |
#94 |
 
:) |
zidzi |
Sep-21-06 02:10 PM |
#125 |

Um bye bye |
Moochy |
Sep-21-06 01:58 PM |
#101 |
 
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Sep-21-06 02:01 PM |
#106 |
  
What will your next screen name be? |
Moochy |
Sep-21-06 02:03 PM |
#112 |
 
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Sep-21-06 02:06 PM |
#117 |
 
How about masturbates to pictures of Bush? |
Moochy |
Sep-21-06 02:07 PM |
#118 |
  
I like those too |
Bush Stole Ohio |
Sep-21-06 02:08 PM |
#120 |
  
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Sep-21-06 02:10 PM |
#124 |
  
LOL! |
Swamp Rat |
Sep-21-06 07:35 PM |
#227 |
 
guess it won't be- |
Bluerthanblue |
Sep-21-06 02:14 PM |
#135 |
 
"Even Hillary Clinton"! Was that |
zidzi |
Sep-21-06 02:11 PM |
#128 |

Deleted message |
Name removed |
Sep-21-06 02:15 PM |
#136 |

Here comes the truth |
Moochy |
Sep-21-06 02:17 PM |
#141 |

Deleted message |
Name removed |
Sep-21-06 02:20 PM |
#148 |
 
Lol asians can't be racists |
Moochy |
Sep-21-06 02:21 PM |
#151 |

"bush did steal Ohio" |
zidzi |
Sep-21-06 02:31 PM |
#174 |

Sad that the only truth was in his screen name |
Moochy |
Sep-21-06 02:33 PM |
#176 |

beware - |
Bluerthanblue |
Sep-21-06 02:12 PM |
#130 |

WOW....and this from a newbie.... |
windbreeze |
Sep-21-06 02:12 PM |
#132 |

Deleted message |
Name removed |
Sep-21-06 02:17 PM |
#142 |

This is political posturing, and if you think it means anything at all |
Marr |
Sep-21-06 01:53 PM |
#90 |
 
Exactly |
Moochy |
Sep-21-06 01:55 PM |
#95 |

I wish it weren't just accepted as well- but is that the hill |
Marr |
Sep-21-06 02:02 PM |
#108 |

I totally disagree with Rangel on this issue |
Zodiak Ironfist |
Sep-21-06 01:54 PM |
#93 |
 
Chavez was at the Baptist church in Harlem this |
malaise |
Sep-21-06 02:37 PM |
#180 |

I agree with the strategy |
Zodiak Ironfist |
Sep-21-06 02:38 PM |
#182 |

A Democratic Victory is a must |
malaise |
Sep-21-06 02:48 PM |
#190 |

Sorry Charlie |
mmonk |
Sep-21-06 01:56 PM |
#98 |

What an ignorant fuck |
notmypresident |
Sep-21-06 02:07 PM |
#119 |

no one picks on bush,,,, |
radfringe |
Sep-21-06 02:08 PM |
#122 |

Put a sock in it Charlie. Who appointed you speech police? |
Tierra_y_Libertad |
Sep-21-06 02:11 PM |
#126 |
 
Who appointed you speech police to tell Charlie to "put a sock in it?" |
Freddie Stubbs |
Sep-21-06 02:19 PM |
#147 |

I did. The vote was a landslide. 1 - 0. |
Tierra_y_Libertad |
Sep-21-06 02:24 PM |
#161 |

Let me see if I understand your logic here |
notmypresident |
Sep-21-06 02:28 PM |
#166 |

Your mistake |
Moochy |
Sep-21-06 02:31 PM |
#172 |

Rangel blew me off at the April 19 NYC peace rally |
npincus |
Sep-21-06 02:12 PM |
#131 |

I hope he's not one of the Rethug UN bashers, because if he is |
treestar |
Sep-21-06 02:18 PM |
#144 |

Its just a tribal thing. Rangel is a good guy |
Jacobin |
Sep-21-06 02:19 PM |
#146 |
 
He may be a good guy but I |
zidzi |
Sep-21-06 02:24 PM |
#158 |

mr. "* shatters the myth of white supremacy once and for all" |
MisterP |
Sep-21-06 02:23 PM |
#157 |

They've been wiretapping Rangel for years don't ya know. |
spanone |
Sep-21-06 02:24 PM |
#159 |

Well I'm not offended by Rangel or Chavez |
OhioBlues |
Sep-21-06 02:29 PM |
#167 |

Rangel vs. Chavez,the clash of the cult of DU personalities begins.... |
rinsd |
Sep-21-06 02:29 PM |
#168 |

INTERNATIONAL TERRITORY is not your district! |
EarthNeedsHope |
Sep-21-06 02:29 PM |
#169 |

What in the hell has happened to DU?? |
Connie_Corleone |
Sep-21-06 02:40 PM |
#185 |

SO FUCK YOU CHARLIE RANGEL! |
LaPera |
Sep-21-06 02:42 PM |
#187 |

Rangel is wrong |
Nite Owl |
Sep-21-06 02:50 PM |
#192 |

Deleted message |
Name removed |
Sep-21-06 02:55 PM |
#195 |
 
I'm sitting here in disbelief over the comments about Rangel. |
Connie_Corleone |
Sep-21-06 02:59 PM |
#199 |

Deleted message |
Name removed |
Sep-21-06 03:01 PM |
#203 |

Uh oh...I see progressive heads exploding... |
SaveElmer |
Sep-21-06 02:57 PM |
#198 |

Dear Draft-Happy Congressperson: You don't speak for me! |
robertpaulsen |
Sep-21-06 03:00 PM |
#200 |

This is one of the few times Charlie is way out of touch n/t |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-21-06 03:00 PM |
#201 |

Charlie is right about this |
FILAM23 |
Sep-21-06 03:00 PM |
#202 |
 
Yeah, let's all wrap ourselves in the flag and follow Dear Leader ... |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-21-06 03:07 PM |
#208 |

DING< DING< DING!!! (nt) |
stepnw1f |
Sep-21-06 07:41 PM |
#230 |

You can have him, Charlie. |
No Surrender |
Sep-21-06 03:04 PM |
#205 |

Shut the fuck up, Rangel. |
patrioticliberal |
Sep-21-06 04:52 PM |
#213 |

I wouldn't label him a LIEberman or Zell ite |
Brian Stevens |
Sep-21-06 06:18 PM |
#217 |

so he's accepted shrub as his president. good to know |
samsingh |
Sep-21-06 06:39 PM |
#218 |

BARF! |
boolean |
Sep-21-06 06:42 PM |
#219 |

That YouTube video...thank you so much for including it. n/t |
Poll_Blind |
Sep-21-06 07:12 PM |
#220 |

hardly |
goodhue |
Sep-21-06 07:13 PM |
#221 |

Let's give Rangel credit |
Jcrowley |
Sep-21-06 07:24 PM |
#222 |

In context the remark was not as "strong." |
gully |
Sep-21-06 07:37 PM |
#228 |

Somebody Wake Me Up |
stepnw1f |
Sep-21-06 07:40 PM |
#229 |

I'm not offended. Please stop pretending that I am |
Solly Mack |
Sep-21-06 07:42 PM |
#231 |

I love ya, Charlie, but you are SOOOOOO wrong on this! |
bobbolink |
Sep-21-06 07:43 PM |
#232 |

LOL! |
Blue State Native |
Sep-21-06 07:50 PM |
#234 |

Charley 'let's have a draft' Rangel is |
lumpy |
Sep-21-06 07:52 PM |
#235 |

Did the Dixie Chicks trash the leader of any country they were in? |
wiley |
Sep-21-06 08:00 PM |
#236 |

Rangel and Pelosi today showed America at it's best. Kudos to both. nt |
Clarkie1 |
Sep-21-06 08:33 PM |
#242 |

He wasn't in your country Chuck |
Jcrowley |
Sep-21-06 08:46 PM |
#246 |

It didnt feel like an attack on me... |
Ksec |
Sep-21-06 08:50 PM |
#248 |

Locking. |
pinto |
Sep-21-06 09:41 PM |
#251 |
 |
Nationalism is a poison... Thanks Rangel.
|
oncall247
(73 posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 214. Rangel is only talking about other presidents or heads of state. |
 |
Remember that. Charlie is really brilliant. He's not talking about any citizen coming to the US and criticizing Bush, just other heads of state.
|
| 2. then tell your president to stop trying to overthrow |
 |
legitimately elected governments.
|
 |
thats the most back-asswards thing I've heard in a while.
|
HiFructosePronSyrup
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
 |
he didn't read the whole thing? 
|
Moochy
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
| 10. Oh Like every other Chavez Basher around here ? |
HiFructosePronSyrup
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:03 PM
Response to Original message |
| 5. He thinks the draft would be a fine idea too |
OhioChick
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
RandiRhodesArchives
(116 posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 123. that he needs to switch parties! |
 |
and he can take Zell LIEbushlover with him too!
|
nini
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 233. you know why he says that don't you? |
 |
because he wants the rich right wingers to put up their own. It's all talk to get them pulled into the light of their hypocrisy.
|
 |
Edited on Thu Sep-21-06 01:05 PM by malaise
How is calling him the devil an attack. Doesn't Bushco call people terrorists with no evidence. Bush is the fugging anti-christ.
Charlie knows a Dem backlash is coming for Chavez speaking at a Baptist Church in Harlem.
Edit - add.
|
| 7. Umm, I didn't feel attacked.. |
 |
.. I felt validated.
Chavez rocks!
|
| 8. when that president represents an immediate threat to world peace . . . |
 |
and, indeed, to the survival of humanity and of the planet itself, I'd say that criticism is quite appropriate -- anytime, any place, and by anyone . . .
|
| 11. I don't agree with it, but it's politically astute |
 |
my own personal opinion is that no one would have dared this kind of disrespect for any previous president. It's a measure of how Bush has trashed America's world image that this could be tolerated, much less applauded, as it was the other day.
on a lighter note, Chavez's reference to the lingering "odor of sulphur" from the "Devil" made for some pretty good fart jokes on Steph Miller's show.
|
| 12. Evil translates into many languages. |
 |
Fuck ALL BUsh apologists. I am not offended by the goddamn truth.
|
feduppuke
(81 posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:09 PM
Original message |
 |
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
cali
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
 |
Charlie Rangel expressed his opinion. He's a good guy, and you may disagree with him, but I find your slurs against him disgusting. Reflects on who you are. Ugh.
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #31 |
 |
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
onenote
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #36 |
| 163. spoken like a true progressive |
Binka
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #163 |
| 237. Oh Carlos Whoops I Mean Onenote |
geek tragedy
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
| 54. Charlie Rangel has done more in his sleep for progressive |
 |
causes than everyone in this thread multiplied by ten in their entire lives.
|
Rex
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #54 |
| 60. Well then he can go and goosestep with his new best friend |
 |
George Bush. I hear Lieberman was a great progressive at one time and pissed his whole career away due to a kiss by the Devil.
|
leftchick
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #60 |
 |
once a progressive not always a progressive. And since when do progressives call for a draft like Rangel?
|
Moochy
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #63 |
| 71. Wasnt his call for the draft a kind of "dare" |
 |
Sort of playing chicken with the pResident?
Also I think I recall the objections to the current state of the all-volunteer army being that we already had a de-facto draft with the stop-losses and national guard units being called up repeatedly.
|
leftchick
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #71 |
| 121. sadly no. Mr. rangel is dead serious |
 |
mr. rangel has an actual bill in congress for a draft. Very progressive of him isn't it?... FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: February 14, 2006 Contact: George Dalley (202) 225-4365 RANGEL REINTRODUCES DRAFT BILL WASHINGTON - Lawmaker Says Volunteer Military May be Overwhelmed by Military Challenges in Iran, North Korea and Syria requiring more troops who will have to be drafted Congressman Charles Rangel today introduced new legislation to reinstate the military draft that will include draftees up to 42 years of age. "Every day that the military option is on the table, as declared by the President in his State of the Union address, in Iran, North Korea, and Syria, reinstatement of the military draft is an option that must also be considered, whether we like it or not," Congressman Rangel said. "If the military is already having trouble getting the recruits they need, what can we do to fill the ranks if the war spreads from Iraq to other countries? We may have no other choice but a draft." The bill would mandate military service for men and women between the ages of 18 and 42. Deferments would be allowed only for completion of high school up to the age of 20, and for reasons of health, conscience or religious belief. Recruits not needed by the military in any given year would be required to perform some national civilian service. "My bill conforms to the age standards that have been set by the Army itself," Congressman Rangel said, referring to the Army's recent announcement raising the top age for Army volunteers from 39 to 42. "With volunteers now being accepted up to the age of 42, it makes sense to cap the age of draftees at 42," Congressman Rangel said. http://www.house.gov/apps/list/press/ny15_rangel/CBRSta...
|
NYCGirl
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #121 |
| 138. If there were a draft, the support for rushing into a ground war would be |
 |
gone. That's Rangel's point.
|
Totallybushed
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #138 |
 |
gives limitless troops to power-mad despots like LBJ. Without a draft, there would have been no "Vietnam".
Rangel is dead wrong on this point.
|
pinto
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #212 |
| 247. (OT) You're off about LBJ. Think Voting Rights Act, Medicare, |
 |
Edited on Thu Sep-21-06 08:48 PM by pinto
the Great Society programs, however flawed some were.
Tagging him with VietNam is shortsighted, imho, overall. It did him in, though. That's a fact.
|
Spearman87
(252 posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #121 |
| 139. In fairness, he was trying to even the playing field |
 |
He said that if the children of the Rich, ie, Cheney's kids and Jenna and Laura Bush, had to go fight in these wars, they wouldn't be so quick to send the kids of the poor to die
|
Moochy
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #139 |
| 164. That was my impression at the time as well |
AZBlue
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #164 |
| 240. Mine also. Knee-jerk reactions prevent some from thinking things through |
 |
and seeing the subtle logic and wisdom.
*sigh*
|
bvar22
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #240 |
| 250. Calling for a DRAFT was indeed PROGRESSIVE, |
 |
and I support Rangel's call for a draft. The RICH should do their FAIR SHARE...fighting WARS AND Paying TAXES!!!
HOWEVER, I am outraged hew would waste his time defending bush* and helping the CorpoMedia FRAME the entire bush* debacle aroung a lighter side comment made by Chavez!....BAD CHARLEY!!! Go stand in the corner!!!
While Rangel was mugging for the cameras, and helping the Republicans divert attention, the REPUBLICANS passed the TORTURE LEGISLATION the bush* DEMANDED.
What did Rangel say about the Republicans changing the official US Policy against torture?
What did ANY Democrat say about the new Torture Legislation? But OOOOOHHH!!!! Chavez called bush* a "devil"... OOOOOHHHHHH!!!!!
Charley, and ALL the DEMOCRATS dropped the ball this week!
|
leftchick
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #139 |
| 179. I don't care what he was trying to do |
 |
putting a bill for a draft in congress is insane by any measure.
|
| 186. But but but, he has a D next to his name! |
leftchick
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #186 |
| 188. the vast majority of Ds |
 |
seem to behaving like Rs these days. This is insane! 
|
| 206. Now stop that! You cannot call the Ds, Rs! It will bring about our |
 |
destruction! Dogs and cats will start living together! Frogs will fall from the sky! My personal opinion is that most in Congress have sold We the People out for a lousy buck. Sad what people will do for money. 
|
Spearman87
(252 posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #179 |
| 194. Think about it this way: The French are pretty slow |
 |
Edited on Thu Sep-21-06 02:59 PM by Spearman87
....to agree to any kind of military action, and have generally opposed Bush's adventures. Since they got out of their own Vietnam entanglement, and became a more socially oriented society, that’s been their typical stance. But until just a few years ago—in the 90s--they had MANDATORY military service: Not just a draft, Every man had to serve. When every family is directly affected, I think it makes a country a bit more responsible in its war decisions. When you think of the draft in this country, you think of Vietnam and all the notorious deferments. At the time I heard him speak at least, Rangle I think was looking for a system with more universal participation, like the French. I don't think that's unreasonable for him to bring it up; As an alternative to the current situation, I would have a hard time calling that an insane option.
|
Spearman87
(252 posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #194 |
| 207. Hey! How about this compromise! |
 |
How about Mandatory military service for all combat-age relatives of the administration that starts military action, and same for any congress that approves such action or declares war. I think that would serve the same purpose 
|
Rex
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #63 |
| 75. Thanks, some people just cannot live outside a black and white |
 |
world and boy do they show it here.
|
geek tragedy
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #60 |
| 69. Okay, this place has become a looney bin. |
 |
Charlie Rangel goose-stepping?
Dear lord, sometimes I wonder what planet some DU'ers are on.
|
Rex
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #69 |
 |
I guess you didn't read the OP.
|
BIG Sean
(259 posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #54 |
 |
I can not believe the morons on here comparing him to Zell.
|
KaptBunnyPants
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #54 |
| 224. Then he should spend more time sleeping. |
 |
And less time defending Bush.
|
cigsandcoffee
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
| 223. It's a brilliant move. |
 |
Do you want Dems to win the midterm elections or not? The last thing we need is moderate Americans rallying around the President because a foreign demagogue is taking shots at him and our country in New York.
The GOP could have made a heyday with this, but Rangel stopped them cold. Well done, DNC and Dem leadership.
|
| 14. He wasn't INSIDE the country. |
 |
When Chavez spoke to the UN, he wasn't technically on United States soil. The UN has extraterritoriality.
And as to criticism: when the Pig Bush stops his ILLEGAL MILITARY ADVENTURES, THEN and only THEN can Rangel make that statement.
|
El Zopilote
(21 posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
 |
Edited on Thu Sep-21-06 01:28 PM by El Zopilote
What is U.S. Congressman Charles Rangél doing? Is he betraying the Democratic Party? He's bashing Hugo Chavez and defending Bush. It is very disturbing and alarming to see a Democrat, especially a monority, to critize an international Hispanic leader and ally by expressing sympathy for Bush and his racist Republicans. Has Mr. Rangél gone loco? Has he turned into a rogue Democrat? Is he a traitor? Hopefully Mr. Rangél has an ulterior motive. But as Democrats we must be careful not to create the slightest impression that our strong united coalition has a crack in it. I consider all minorities (African-Americans, Hispanics of course, Muslims, American Indians and all to be my brothers in the cause of solidarity). We must remain united. Solidarity is the key to victory. We do not need dissent.
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #41 |
 |
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
| 15. Well maybe the United Nations should move to a friendlier country |
 |
instead of one that is ruled by a raving lunatic dictator.
|
otohara
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
| 30. UN Is Considered International Territory and.... |
 |
In the 1960s new General Assembly and Secretariat buildings were built in New York, but there are major agencies located in Geneva, Switzerland and elsewhere. http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=United_Natio... Yes....I think you're right, next time, this should be held in friendlier Geneva.
|
Bad Penny
(392 posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
| 129. Bush doesn't like conventions in Geneva |
treestar
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #129 |
| 152. ROTLF at that graphic! Good one! |
otohara
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
| 57. Chavez Said The Same Thing....He Proposed.... |
| 16. I wonder what Chavez's new friend will say about this? |
 |
Edited on Thu Sep-21-06 01:12 PM by Freddie Stubbs
|
NNN0LHI
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
| 19. That is proof that Muslims and Christians can get along just dandy |
 |
The cat is out of the bag.
Don
|
Rex
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
Freddie Stubbs
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
| 28. Does Ahmadinejad promote a religion of peace? |
Rex
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
| 39. Why don't you ask the Pope. |
HiFructosePronSyrup
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #39 |
Freddie Stubbs
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #39 |
| 51. When has the Pope encouraged violence? |
HiFructosePronSyrup
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #51 |
| 56. When he called a billion people evil and inhuman. |
Freddie Stubbs
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #56 |
| 61. Who did he call inhuman? |
 |
Edited on Thu Sep-21-06 01:37 PM by Freddie Stubbs
Can you provide the quote?
|
HiFructosePronSyrup
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #61 |
 |
But I'm sure you're already aware of the statements.
|
Freddie Stubbs
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #62 |
| 73. Can you please provide the quote where he calls muslims inhuman or |
 |
advocates violence? I'm not aware of those statements. If they are so well known, you should not have any trouble providing them. 
|
HiFructosePronSyrup
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #73 |
| 74. But you are aware of them. |
 |
You're just pretending you're not.
|
Rex
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #74 |
| 78. He must have missed the huge apology from the Pope. |
 |
I could have sworn Foxnews showed it.
|
Freddie Stubbs
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #78 |
| 81. He apologized for advocating violence? |
Rex
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #81 |
 |
Why else would he apologize? 
|
Freddie Stubbs
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #84 |
| 86. People say a lot of things that they need to take back |
 |
Can you provide a link to him advocating violence? 
|
Rex
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #86 |
| 89. Really? You mean like the Pope? |
Freddie Stubbs
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #89 |
| 105. But they don't all advocate violence against groups of people |
| 111. Well then he should have never apologized if he really was |
 |
sincere about not wanting to incite violence in the Muslim world. Just sayin...
|
Freddie Stubbs
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #111 |
| 127. Kucinich apologized to the NAACP |
| 134. So Dennis apologized for missing a meeting, but the Pope apologized |
 |
Edited on Thu Sep-21-06 02:18 PM by Rex
for inciting violence among the Muslim population. Yeah, I guess you could compare those two if you were really desperate.
Edit - And why did Dennis miss the meeting you ask? So he could vote on a bill. Come on Fred, you can do better.
|
Freddie Stubbs
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #134 |
| 140. Still looking for that qoute inciting violence? |
Binka
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #145 |
| 239. Gee Fred Is Still Licking The Lost Stamp |
ShortnFiery
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #78 |
| 204. The Pope did NOT ever apologize for *the content* - he should resign n/t |
Freddie Stubbs
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #74 |
| 80. I am not aware of any statements of the Pope advocating violence or |
 |
calling anyone inhuman.
Are you aware of any?
|
HiFructosePronSyrup
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #80 |
 |
It's gotten quite a bit of news lately.
|
Freddie Stubbs
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #83 |
| 85. Can you provide a link to these statements advocating violence? |
HiFructosePronSyrup
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #85 |
Rex
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #96 |
 |
I wonder if the Pope knows about irony?
|
Freddie Stubbs
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #96 |
| 109. I see no call to violence in that |
 |
"God is not pleased by blood, and not acting reasonably ("syn logo") is contrary to God's nature."
|
HiFructosePronSyrup
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #109 |
 |
and when Ahmadinejad said Israel "should be wiped off the map," he was talking about the game of Risk he happened to be playing at the time. 
|
| 116. Did he ever apologize for his remarks? |
HiFructosePronSyrup
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #116 |
 |
The Pope didn't really apologize for his remarks.
As for Ahmadinejad, he's publically stated he's got no plans or desires to attack Israel.
|
datasuspect
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #85 |
| 149. have you heard of this new thing called "google" |
 |
consistently asking for quotes while playing the naif is not very becoming.
|
| 154. He can only type in three words, if nothing comes up then all is good |
 |
and fine in the world. Oh, almost forgot the 
|
Freddie Stubbs
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #149 |
| 155. Google search for "pope advocated violence" yeilds no results |
treestar
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #73 |
| 160. Then neither should you. |
 |
Looks like there is enough you are not aware of that we can't really provide you with all that information.
Sorry, the concept that all the Christians collectively are better than all the Muslims collectively does not fly. And we certainly can't expect the Muslims to accept it even if we believe it.
|
Rex
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #56 |
Rex
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #51 |
| 70. Did you miss his apology the other day? |
 |
For calling the Muslim religion one of violence? It was on the TEEVEE.
|
Freddie Stubbs
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #70 |
| 76. That wasn't the question |
 |
When did the Pope advocate violence?
|
Rex
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #76 |
Freddie Stubbs
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #77 |
| 88. But you haven't been able to provide any proof that he advocated violence |
Rex
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #88 |
| 92. It was in the news, I am very sorry if you missed it. |
 |
You do know how to use google right? 
|
Freddie Stubbs
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #92 |
| 100. Yes, but nothing come up when you search "pope advocated violence" |
| 102. That's because you worded it incorrectly. |
Freddie Stubbs
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #102 |
| 175. Thess google search yeilds some documents: |
hfojvt
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #77 |
| 103. maybe because it is so far away from accurate |
 |
first, the Pope never said muslims were evil and inhuman. He quoted a 1,000 year old writing which said that Islam, where original, was evil and inhuman.
You may say it is the same thing. Except notice that I just did what the Pope did (except I paraphrased). Does that mean I agree with everything that I quote? Not unless I say so in my own words. In the Pope's speech that quote was not the basis or the summary of a thesis. It was used to make a different point. A point where he, in fact, argues against violence and coercion.
That is pretty far away from advocating violence, no matter what the over-sensitive and Pope haters and Catholic haters may 'think' about it.
|
| 107. LOL. Pope/Catholic haters, thanks for playing. |
 |
Why did the Pope use the passage in the first place? He had to know it would incite a violent reaction from Muslims. Or is it just more of that willful ignorance people love to hide behind? 
|
hfojvt
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #107 |
| 173. LOL, the 'willful ignorance' meme |
 |
because we all know exactly how people are going to react. We all should know what 'tar baby' means. We all know how people will react to a quote. Especially millions of people. Even after the fact, I do not think their reaction to his speech was appropriate.
|
| 183. Well of course you don't. |
 |
Willful ignorance as a meme? Talk about jumping the shark! 
|
hfojvt
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #183 |
| 191. okay, maybe it is just a talking point |
HiFructosePronSyrup
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #103 |
| 110. Well, that's the thing, isn't it? |
 |
A person can pretend the Pope was "only quoting" and that it's not really advocating violence.
But he wasn't just quoting, and he really was advocating violence.
"Pope haters and Catholic haters."
LOL
|
hfojvt
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #110 |
| 189. this whole business of 'pretend' is kinda confusing |
 |
Person A: X is true. Person B: X is false. Because of A, B and C. Person A: You can pretend that X is false, but X is really true.
You really need alot more explication in your argument than arguing that your opponents are pretending.
Is 'LOL' a cogent argument? "Pope haters" is a funny term somehow? Yet you are bashing the Pope without being able to justify it, except to another poster who says 'Dayum' (or ditto). Sort of a 'friends agree with friends in order to express friendship'. Or 'If you like a person they can dump a plate of spaghetti in your lap and you will laugh, but if you hate a person, then the way they hold their fork infuriates you.'
I read a good portion of Ratzinger's speech, so if you wanna convince me that he was advocating violence you need a clearer argument.
|
| 196. We are laughing at you (pope haters), did you not get it? |
 |
We get it, try to catch up!
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #196 |
 |
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
| 216. Yeah the second one. |
Binka
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #216 |
| 241. But He Hoped It Wasn't True |
 |
I am sure you feel better with that said. HAHAHAHA. Rex you rock!
|
KaptBunnyPants
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #39 |
Bake
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
| 153. Sure. As long as they both hate the U.S. |
 |
I say fuck 'em both. Any DUer who thinks Ahmadinejad is a "good guy" needs his/her head examined.
Bake
|
SlavesandBulldozers
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #153 |
| 226. they don't hate the US |
 |
they correctly think the US is run by a madman.
|
| 17. Chavez may be a loon, but he has just as much right to criticize Bush as |
 |
anyone else. Freedom of Speech is a right. Period.
Cue Chavez auto-defense because I expressed my opinion that he's a loon. I fully expect to be called one or more of the following:
1.) right-wing shill 2.) A corporatist 3.) A Freeper 4.) Conservative
Let's see how creative it gets.
|
Moochy
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
| 27. Right wing shill corporatist freeper conservative |
Caution
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Sep-21-06 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
| 42. That didn't take long now did it :) |
 |
Though I was hoping for something new. The cult of personality around him is just so uncreative with their basic insults. Of course I am none of the above (In fact my personal politics fall to the left of Chavez) but hey any negative comments about Chavez always results in instant recrimination. It's like saying you don't like Randi Rhodes' show or Mike Malloy's show (I don't like either of their shows) or of course saying you don't believe in X(choose any of the following: MIHOP, LIHOP, astrology, chemtrails, chelation therapy, the healing "power" of prayer, homeopathy, god or unicorns).
|