Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton, 9/11 and the Facts (from the DATA DUMP)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 04:26 PM
Original message
Clinton, 9/11 and the Facts (from the DATA DUMP)
Edited on Wed Aug-30-06 04:26 PM by WilliamPitt
Clinton, 9/11 and the Facts
By William Rivers Pitt
t r u t h o u t | Perspective

Wednesday 30 August 2006

The fifth anniversary of the September 11 attacks is less than two weeks away, but the avalanche has already begun. Oliver Stone's film "World Trade Center" has been advertised in all corners and is being screened across the nation. CNN has announced that it intends, on the 11th, to rebroadcast all of the coverage of the attacks from 8:30 a.m. until midnight. If you don't have cable, they say, you can watch it for free on the CNN web site.

ABC intends to mark the occasion in far more grand a fashion. Starting September 10th and ending September 11th, the network will show a miniseries titled "The Path to 9/11." According to reports from early screenings, the writer/producer of the miniseries, Cyrus Nowrasteh, has crafted a television polemic intended to blame the entire event on President Clinton.

Nowrasteh, an outspoken conservative of Persian descent whose family fled Iran after the fall of the Shah, spoke last year at the Liberty Film Festival, described by its founders as Hollywood's first conservative film festival. Govindini Murty, actress, writer, and co-director of the Liberty Film Festival, wrote a review of "The Path to 9/11" for the right-wing online news page FrontPageMag.com.

In the review, Murty states, "'The Path to 9/11' is one of the best, most intelligent, most pro-American miniseries I've ever seen on TV, and conservatives should support it and promote it as vigorously as possible. This is the first Hollywood production I've seen that honestly depicts how the Clinton administration repeatedly bungled the capture of Osama bin Laden."

FrontPageMag, it should be noted, held a symposium back in May to argue that the Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, which were never found despite being the main reason for invasion, were actually spirited out of Iraq by Russia on the eve of the 2003 attack. So it goes.

Leaving aside the wretched truth that the far right is once again using September 11 to score political points, the facts regarding the still-lingering effort to blame the Clinton administration for the attacks must be brought to the fore. Nowrasteh, at several points in his miniseries, rolls out a number of oft-debunked allegations that Clinton allowed Osama bin Laden to remain alive and free before the attacks.

Roger Cressy, National Security Council senior director for counterterrorism in the period 1999-2001, responded to these allegations in an article for the Washington Times in 2003. "Mr. Clinton approved every request made of him by the CIA and the U.S. military involving using force against bin Laden and al-Qaeda," wrote Cressy. "As President Bush well knows, bin Laden was and remains very good at staying hidden. The current administration faces many of the same challenges. Confusing the American people with misinformation and distortions will not generate the support we need to come together as a nation and defeat our terrorist enemies."

Measures taken by the Clinton administration to thwart international terrorism and bin Laden's network were historic, unprecedented and, sadly, not followed up on. Consider the steps offered by Clinton's 1996 omnibus anti-terror legislation, the pricetag for which stood at $1.097 billion. The following is a partial list of the initiatives offered by the Clinton anti-terrorism bill:

*Screen Checked Baggage: $91.1 million

*Screen Carry-On Baggage: $37.8 million

*Passenger Profiling: $10 million

*Screener Training: $5.3 million

*Screen Passengers (portals) and Document Scanners: $1 million

*Deploying Existing Technology to Inspect International Air Cargo: $31.4 million

*Provide Additional Air/Counterterrorism Security: $26.6 million

*Explosives Detection Training: $1.8 million

*Augment FAA Security Research: $20 million

*Customs Service: Explosives and Radiation Detection Equipment at Ports: $2.2 million

*Anti-Terrorism Assistance to Foreign Governments: $2 million

*Capacity to Collect and Assemble Explosives Data: $2.1 million

*Improve Domestic Intelligence: $38.9 million

*Critical Incident Response Teams for Post-Blast Deployment: $7.2 million

*Additional Security for Federal Facilities: $6.7 million

*Firefighter/Emergency Services Financial Assistance: $2.7 million

*Public Building and Museum Security: $7.3 million

*Improve Technology to Prevent Nuclear Smuggling: $8 million

*Critical Incident Response Facility: $2 million

*Counter-Terrorism Fund: $35 million

*Explosives Intelligence and Support Systems: $14.2 million

*Office of Emergency Preparedness: $5.8 million

The Clinton administration poured more than a billion dollars into counterterrorism activities across the entire spectrum of the intelligence community, into the protection of critical infrastructure, into massive federal stockpiling of antidotes and vaccines to prepare for a possible bioterror attack, into a reorganization of the intelligence community itself. Within the National Security Council, "threat meetings" were held three times a week to assess looming conspiracies. His National Security Advisor, Sandy Berger, prepared a voluminous dossier on al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden, actively tracking them across the planet. Clinton raised the issue of terrorism in virtually every important speech he gave in the last three years of his tenure.

Lots More: http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/083006J.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks, Will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. I am ready to boycott Disney (ABC) if they go ahead and air this..
Pro-Republican political propaganda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Same here - and I have a 5yo who will never step foot at ANY mouse park
for the rest of her childhood or purchase one piece of ANY Disney merchandise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R
Maybe bad timing to post this in the midst of Malloygate. Hope it doesnt get lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. I've been out helping a friend move all day
This was my first chance to post it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. ABC must pull this hatchet-job
Unless Nowrasteh changes this bullshit to account for Bush's failures and stop peddling lies, this "docu-drama" should be pulled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. How do start a movement to do this? The Cons did this with CBS..
when they were going to air the Reagan mini-series. They got the series pulled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. It sounds like documentary style fiction to me...aka propaganda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. Thanks for this timely post, Will...
One of my 300+ cousins just posted some Freeperville tripe about Clinton on our family website... argh! And he tried to say it was in an attempt to get me to read up on my history... I told him that wasn't history, it was hysteria! Dumbass is fouling the gene pool!

Thanks... timely and wise.


:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. I wonder if they'll drag out Mansoor Ijaz for an interview. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
12. can we get this on greatest???
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
13. Anyone know if one of the criteria for profiling is that you
voted against the GOP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
14. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
15. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
16. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
17. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
18. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
19. One last punt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
althecat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
20. ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
21. Thanks, Will.
:kick:ed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC