Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WH Using Liquid Explosive Detector It REFUSED To Install At US Airports

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 09:37 AM
Original message
WH Using Liquid Explosive Detector It REFUSED To Install At US Airports
Thursday, August 17, 2006

White House using liquid explosive detector it refused to install at US airports to protect you and me
by John in DC - 8/17/2006 10:23:00 AM

Uh oh.

Since the early 1990s, AS&E has made SmartCheck, a $50,000 low-intensity X-ray scanner that can spot a bottle of organic compounds in a passenger's pocket.

But is the liquid an explosive, or a batch of baby formula? Ahura says its $30,000 handheld laser scanner, the First Defender, can answer the question. The device can ``see" through glass or plastic bottles and identify any of 2,500 different chemical compounds in about 15 seconds. The FBI and New York City police already use the Ahura system, which went on sale about a year ago.

Joe Reiss, AS&E's vice president of marketing, said his company's SmartCheck systems are used at the White House and the US Supreme Court. But they're not widely used in airport security. TSA agreed last year to conduct tests of the system. But Reiss said those tests had not yet begun.


Why? Because Bush and the Republicans who control Congress didn't give Homeland Security enough money.

http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2006/08/17/us_delays_security_for_liquid_bombs/
via:
http://americablog.blogspot.com/2006/08/white-house-using-liquid-explosive.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Homeland Security should be "pulling itself up by the bootstraps".
The "welfare queens" at TSA need to get a job and buy these things for themselves instead of relying on the government to baby them. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. That wouldn't scare people enough...
it's much scarier and more intimidating when guards are patting people down and confiscating their personal belongings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sinti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's not about protection, it's about control n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC