Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When did Shi'ites become Shia?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Pryderi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-07-06 11:49 PM
Original message
When did Shi'ites become Shia?
Is it a way to make us forget we used to hate Shi'ites?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. Who's this 'we'?
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. Here's information that is easy to find to answer your original question
http://www.islamfortoday.com/shia.htm

The Origins of the Sunni/Shia split in Islam


<snip>
The term Shia or Shi'ite derives from a shortening of Shiat Ali or partisans of Ali.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalVoice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. Shia is actually the correct arabic pernunciation. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
4. Shi'ite is a bastardization of Shi'a
Shi'a was always a better word. It's a direct transliteration, whereas "Shi'ite" is an English bastardization of "Shi'a"

From Wikipedia.

"The term Shi'a comes from the Arabic word شيعة Shī`ah. The singular/adjective form of this name is Arabic Shī`ī شيعي.

"Shi'a" is the short form of the historic phrase Shi`at `Ali شيعة علي, meaning "the followers of Ali". Sunni and Shi`ah sources trace the term to the years preceding the death of Muhammad."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Thank you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. I always learn so much at DU.
Thanks, Swamp! :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pryderi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. Wasn't Ayatollah Khomeni a Shia? Is Osama a wahhabist?
I remember in the late 70's and early 80s seeing things like "I stepped in some Shiite"

Weren't most of the Saudi Arabian 9-11 hijackers, wahhabists? Don't they still have madrassas in Saudi Arabia that are breeding more hatred of Americans? Or, is Saudi Arabia mostly a Sunni nation?


Isn't an Islamic Caliphate the goal of Osama?

Which brand of Islam do the Palestininians practice?

I thought Sunnis were more secularist than Shia.

Are Syria and Lebanon mostly Shia? I'm confused. Can someone overstuff a nutshell for me?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evox Donating Member (276 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. You have the wrong equation son...
1- Don't ever mistake Osama and his whacked up Taleban tribe for ordinary Muslims. Osama is a Wahabbist. A renewed type of sect which is basically a very extreme view of Sunni Islam but not quite. Even some sunni muslims denounce wahhabis as non-sunnis since they give them a very bad image. Wahhabis believe that anyone that is not a sunni is an infidel and they view shia as enemies, traitors, and non-muslim. Wahabbis are pretty much an extremly psyched up cult, I'd stay away from them.

2- Most palestinians are Sunnis but not Wahabbis.

3- Sunnis are more or less equivelant to Shia except with minor differences.

4- Syria and Lebanon have a large population of Shia muslims, but I doubt they're the majority over there.


There might a slight error in whatever I stated since I just typed the material based on what I learned myself and not copied from any sources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poverlay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 02:53 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Could you imagine if the Catholics and the Mormons, or the Presbyterians
and the Baptists decided to go to war with each other? It would be nuts! Maybe have the Amish running around blowing things and people up, screaming "Jesus is great" over and over as they slit throats and throw rocks.

For some reason your post evoked that imagining in me when I considered the minor differences between the sects.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellst0nev0ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 04:14 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Hmm, You've Obviously Missed Much Of The 13th-19th Centuries
Look up the Albigensians, the Catholic persecution of Protestants, Bloody Mary, and all the other religious warfare we would rather forget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poverlay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 04:37 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Of course you're right. I just had a "what if" moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evox Donating Member (276 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 04:21 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Forgot to mention that
when I stated that Sunni and Shia muslims were almost the same except with minor differences I sort of meant there is no real struggle between them. They do have a wide difference of opinions on some issues, yet those issues don't cause them to hate or fight each other. The real problem is when you have people like the Wahabbis adding fuel to both sides, killing people from both sides so that they can fight each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 06:48 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Colonial powers love to use religious differences....
To keep the "natives" disunited. In 1791, the United Irishmen was created in Belfast--to fight for the rights of Protestants (Church of Ireland), Dissenters & Catholics. The resulting rebellion failed, the Irish Parliament was dissolved & Union between Great Britain & Ireland began.

Of course, there were still conflicts among the religious factions. Some English fanned those flames; when Home Rule was imminent, Lord Randolph Churchill said "Ulster will fight & Ulster will be right." He didn't care about the Ulster Protestants--but his party needed their representatives in Parliament.

Catholics & Protestants live together quite happily in many countries. They're making some progress at last--up in Northeast Ulster.

Many Iraqi neighborhoods had been "mixed" for a long time. But that's changing. The extremists are doing valuable work for the Occupying Power.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellst0nev0ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 04:20 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Abu Bakr vs. Ali
give the caliphate to a competant older man, or to the teenaged cousin of Muhammad because of bloodrights? Centuries of bloody conflict rests on that stupid goddamn question :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC