|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
|
| QuettaKid
|
Thu Aug-03-06 07:38 AM Original message |
| WH wants to EXPAND USE OF MILITARY TRIBUNALS to include |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| |
| ThomCat
|
Thu Aug-03-06 07:39 AM Response to Original message |
| 1. And Haliburton is building prison camps in the US desert. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MiniMe
|
Thu Aug-03-06 07:55 AM Response to Original message |
| 2. Does this seem to be a bit unconstitutional to anybody else? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mmonk
|
Thu Aug-03-06 07:56 AM Response to Reply #2 |
| 3. The constitution is over until some political power |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Jensen
|
Thu Aug-03-06 09:20 AM Response to Reply #3 |
| 11. OR "WE THE PEOPLE " are on the street demanding of "OUR" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HereSince1628
|
Thu Aug-03-06 07:59 AM Response to Reply #2 |
| 4. It's a broadening of martial law. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| malaise
|
Thu Aug-03-06 08:00 AM Response to Reply #2 |
| 5. a bit? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| QuettaKid
|
Thu Aug-03-06 08:30 AM Response to Reply #5 |
| 6. When you combine stories like this one with |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MadHound
|
Thu Aug-03-06 08:32 AM Response to Reply #6 |
| 7. Do you have a link to that story? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| malaise
|
Thu Aug-03-06 08:36 AM Response to Reply #7 |
| 9. Try this |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| QuettaKid
|
Thu Aug-03-06 09:31 AM Response to Reply #7 |
| 15. better link direct to article |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MadHound
|
Thu Aug-03-06 09:49 AM Response to Reply #15 |
| 16. Thanks, looks like interesting, but scary reading |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| converted_democrat
|
Fri Aug-04-06 07:33 AM Response to Reply #15 |
| 17. Jesus, that's a scary read.... n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| malaise
|
Thu Aug-03-06 08:35 AM Response to Reply #6 |
| 8. Yes the US is |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| converted_democrat
|
Thu Aug-03-06 08:40 AM Response to Original message |
| 10. Wow.. It's scary to even think about what their plans could be with |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| sinkingfeeling
|
Thu Aug-03-06 09:22 AM Response to Original message |
| 12. Let's hope there are still enough sane members of Congress to stop this. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| lisby
|
Thu Aug-03-06 09:24 AM Response to Original message |
| 13. And the very fact that no one believes this could be possible |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Marr
|
Thu Aug-03-06 09:27 AM Response to Original message |
| 14. That's not all. The Secretary of Defense gets to decide, on a whim, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 25th 2013, 10:50 AM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC