Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is US screwing up Lebanon evacuations?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 01:06 AM
Original message
Is US screwing up Lebanon evacuations?
I see that we're getting our citizens out of Lebanon---slowly. However, it seems like we are royally screwing up.

I just saw an interview that Anderson Cooper did with a woman who said she escaped to Cyprus with US help. However, she said it was "impossible" to get through to the US Embassy. She said she finally got through after repeatedly dialing for an hour and a half. After getting through, she said they were not helpful and told her they put her on a list. She said she got out because her father had a medical condition.

Anderson Cooper said there are 25,000 Americans in Lebanon--and at least 10,000 want out.

I feel like I'm watching the Katrina aftermath--feeling so helpless as people wait for their government that is not doing enough.

Am I being unfair?

I guess I don't understand why this isn't a military operation. Why can't we get military ships or many other large aircraft in to get people out quickly.

It's been reported that other countries (France, etc) got their people out quickly. I'm wondering how many people they evacuated. Maybe they only had a few hundred? Why can these other countries get their people out rapidly--and the United States can't?

So...is the United States slow to help its own citizens...or am I being too judgmental?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bjornsdotter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes


Whoever is running this evacuation could fuck up a one man parade.

Cheers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. "fema could fuck up a one car funeral"
Edited on Wed Jul-19-06 01:17 AM by pitohui
that is what the honorable congressman gene taylor from mississippi said in the aftermath of katrina

and if you object to language, keep in mind his home town bay st. louis is COMPLETELY destroyed with dozens of known dead in bsl/waveland alone


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I'm trying to read as much as I can...
...on this, and I just read that Italy, France and other countries got their people out. They're all ready gone!

I just don't get this.

I guess I need to do some more reading.

I cannot understand why--after several days--we've evacuated less than 500 US citizens, and we have just under 10,000 to go. At this rate, they should be out sometime in September.

Why aren't we seeing massive evacuations?

I must be missing something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
4. Every other country in the world is doing better than the US
this article describes how well the Latin American countries are doing
http://english.people.com.cn/200607/19/eng20060719_284605.html

If the poorer states in L.America can manage to get their people to safety and the US citizens are trapped there getting busy signals, then the answer to your question is yes, the US is screwing up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
5. Look, Junior and his fratboy buddies honestly don't care
That is the bottom line.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
6. No. "Screwing up" implies that it's accidental.
This is no more accidental than the "liberation" of Iraq or the FEMA NOLA debacle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
7. You have to give a shit if you want to do public service.
Bush doesn't, so we get Katrina, Iraq, and incompetent evacuations....really, I'd have been more surprised if this government had actually executed the evacuation in a timely fashion like other nations were able.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
8. they put Michael Brown in charge
and Brownie is doing a heck of a job

he saved New Orleans during Katrina, after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 02:06 AM
Response to Original message
9. Katrina II.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 02:34 AM
Response to Original message
10. They need to blockade the harbor. They can only do that with lots
of warships, that are enroute from half a dozen nations. The Israelis are doing it now, but they need more assets, further out, to fully screen the area.

They will make the harbor safe, allow the vessels in, and provide them safe passage out, so they don't end up getting "USS Cole'd" by some asshole in an inflatable boat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I'm worried about that too...
All of those giant cruise ships and military ships--from all over the world--seem like sitting ducks.

This should be a very involved military operation---getting our citizens to safety and making sure that a terrorist event doesn't happen.

Frankly, I'm astounded that more precautions aren't being taken with those ships full of evacuees. I think those people are in danger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Once they have the screen in place, they won't even have to physically
see it to kill it. They should be all right.

The danger lies before the warships are positioned. After they've got their ducks in a row, it's as safe as houses, unless the Hizzies have managed to put a few mines out there in the interim (unlikely, that).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. Steve Clemons from The Washington Note from the other day:
BAD IDEA: US Plans to Evacuate Americans in Lebanon by Cruise Ship


Bill Kristol is not the only one who wants America dragged into a worsening conflagration in the Middle East.

Militants who want to test American resolve and further bolster their legitimacy in the eyes of a frightened, frustrated, and weary public may want to trigger the military involvement of the United States on another front in the Middle East.

Now comes the news that the U.S. is going to evacuate Americans caught in the crossfire in Lebanon by cruise ship on Tuesday.

I don't believe that the neocons would ever try to sabotage our rescue of Americans via a cruise liner. That would be too cynical of me -- and they are ideas people, not military practitioners.

But there are players on all sides of this conflict that may find a floating, slow, and poorly defended elephant of a ship too tempting of a target. Real or contrived, any potential attack would look like a Hezbollah attack.

The U.S. is sending a navy destroyer escort -- but I think that's too little.

I sincerely hope that my paranoia about this proves to be entirely wrong, but serious planners have to be worried about sending a cruise ship, a slow moving huge target, into a war zone.

-- Steve Clemons

11:56 AM | Permalink | Comments (95)


HE BRINGS UP A GOOD QUESTION: "neocons would ever try to sabotage our rescue of Americans via a cruise line" DON'T THE NEOCONS WANT A WAR WITH IRAN + SYRIA? WHAT BETTER WAY TO SELL IT THAN AN ATTACK ON A DEFENSELESS CRUISE SHIP. REMEMBER 9/11? SORRY STEVE, BUT I AM CYNICAL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
icymist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. OMG! That would be like the Lusitania all over again!
I've been have a bad feeling about this situation for three days now, like the one I got right before Katrina hit NOLA! Is another 'Pearl Harbor' type event about to 'stir up the base'?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
13. Is the sky blue?(nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC