Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Just a question about word choice?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 09:25 AM
Original message
Poll question: Just a question about word choice?
I personally don't think arrogate is a word used by most Americans more than once a decade.

Which do you think is most effective? All these are based on the definition of arrogate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. I chose "arrogantly" because it describes him to a T - however,
it depends on the audience. If the audience is mixed or overwhelmingly right - I would use the second option. I agree that 'arrogate' is to unfamiliar to most to be effective.

I love your concern about word choice - refreshing! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. Every public speech is a speech to the public. National leaders
speak to the entire nation each time they utter a word in public. The audience is ALWAYS mixed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #13
26. And yet Senator Lugar says he is against the Iraq War when in the UK,
and returns home to Indiana with resolve to fight the war. Don't try and tell me that speakers don't choose different words for different audiences.

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #26
32. They do. And it comes home to roost. Think of Lott at a birthday party
for an old southern senator.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. A president who arrogates to himself power.
I vote for #1


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Interesting, I'd like to know why?
Really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
20. Because at the time I heard it, I knew what "arrogates to oneself" meant.
It's what I would have used in the speech if I had thought of it myself. :)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. it was a polite way of saying arrogant, IMO
but I agree that it's not a usage you see much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. IMHO it defys the plain speech needed to deal a crushing
blow.

The "arrogate" sort of language can't convince people who don't know what it means, it simply feeds their notion that liberals are educated elitists who can't relate to common people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #8
21. you have a point... on the other hand
using the word 'arrogant' plays right into the GOP spin that Gore is 'angry'. Actually, this phrasing here is a good rebuttal to that as it shows intellect rather than emotion. If that mantle were to be picked up by so-called dem pundits, which it won't, it would be a means to not let the 'angry' argument stand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #21
30. Arrogate implies arrogance. So intellectually it says the same
thing but only to people who have better than average lexicons. Which is to say it speaks to an educated elite. Democrats have a bad rap for behaving that way. Should we feed that mischaracterization?

If some people hear in the word arrogant anger, rather than other emotions such as dismay, frustration, or affront, it could be because of the way it was delivered. Even so, aren't we justified if we feel anger that Bush violated our civil rights, broke the law, and abused his constitutional authority? If we can't be angry now, when can we be?





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
5. "Seizes" power that is not lawfully his -- like a dictator? nt
Edited on Tue Jan-17-06 09:36 AM by DeepModem Mom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
6. It was near enough etymologically to other words
I think most people could sense the meaning of the word, given context, even if they didn't know it. It also politely suggests the word "arrogant" in association with power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Why be polite? Gore accused Bush of breaking the law by abuse of power!
Polite is important?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. Polite = good manners. Courtesy in the south is very important
And that's a large part of the population.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. Polite in what should be a call to arms? I don't buy that.
Seems to me the language of the south is just as plain spoken and direct as anywhere else, I've lived 11 years of my adult life in the south.

Is the south you're talking about the same south where ClearChannel radio called for their listeners to attack antiwar protesters in the days before Iraq II, or is that south some other south?






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. Courtesy is in the eye of the beholder
Just because someone uses the right words doesn't mean they're going to act in humane ways. We're talking courtesy, not kindness. I just know that 90% of my very old southern family considers good manners essential. Plain spoken and direct is the voice of the common man. He's trying to reach rich southerners with a conscience. The poor ones are already with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. Most of those rich southerners support the DNC and they weren't polite
in their response to Gore, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #27
35. I was just giving reasons not excuses. n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
7. Paraphrasing Lakoff...
"Bush** power grab."

(A variation on Lakoff's "Another Republican power grab.")

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
9. We have so butchered the arts of language and oration in this country....
It's sad, really. :cry:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. How do you build a rallying cry around "arrogation?"
We need to reach the masses with the message, not impress them with our use of a Thesaurus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. I have no idea.
I just miss the style and inspiration. We're poorer without it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
12. I had to look up "arrogate" and "abrogate".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. Almost all of us who wanted to know what it meant did too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
14. I would say "grants"
A President who grants himself power, if it fits with the rest of the sentence. But I don't mind words that I don't regularly use. Somewhere along the line we've got to gain some regard for education again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StatsBabe Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. I would also say "grants"
Its just that we know the attitude behind the actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. Bush seizes power for himself
"Seize" is the best word to use. Similar meaning to "grab".

Arrogate is lawyer-speak. I never heard that word until yesterday.

Using the word "grant" is no good, because it implies he had every right to grant himself extra powers, when in fact he is taking power beyond the limits of his authority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #22
33. I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #14
23. When trying to start an impeachment is the time for a vocabulary
Edited on Tue Jan-17-06 10:24 AM by HereSince1628
lesson?

Unless the vocabulary is specific to legal issues you must proove, I think you want to be plain spoken.

But then I'm recapitulating my previous pronouncement...impeachment necessitates the coalesence of a national concensus encompassing even those with depauperate lexicons.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. Because it all hinges on the word "arrogate"
Go write a letter or make a phone call or something. This doesn't even amount to an ant hill, let alone a mole hill, and certainly not a mountain that will stand in the way of impeachment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. None of what we do on DU matters, unless you see a broader
implication.

Liberals are demonized as being an educated elite out of touch with the average American. As a party we've not arrogated erudition, but we are condemned by it.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. Which is why I said
Go write a letter or make a phone call, because that does matter. And try not to use words like arrogated and erudition. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. Yes, we write. This isn't a post like many for non-present freepers
or a sermon to the choir.

Its a post not for only ordinary DU'ers, but for people including Democratic staff and democratic leaning editorial writers who lurk and fish blogs for ideas.

To gain a national consensus that will achieve a serious investigation of Bush's abuses, we need memorable talking points. We need simple, plain, very pointed language that communicate unambiguously why everyone should take affront with Bush's abuses.

If our memes can state the danger simply in black and white and claim written legal authority all the better, because fear, Manicheanism, and authority appeal to conservative personalities. And we need conservatives to build an adequately large national consensus to hold Bush accountable for his crimes.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
34. I was fine with the use of the word "arrogate"
Anyone who dismisses the entire speech based on one word is not interested in anything Gore has to say, anyway. It's like condemning him in 2000 for wearing a brown suit.

As for the "intellectual/elitist" image, that is precisely what bush and his supporters have been touting about Roberts and now Alito, how frickin' intelligent they are. Remember also that bush's base is in fact the wealthier, higher-educated white male, and they do know or can certainly infer from context the meaning of the word "arrogate."

Gore is his own man and speaks with his own voice. To do otherwise would compromise his speech and douse its fire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC