Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sibel Edmonds Lauds Gore Speech

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 03:00 AM
Original message
Sibel Edmonds Lauds Gore Speech
http://news.baou.com/main.php?action=recent&rid=20751

http://www.bradblog.com/archives/00002289.htm

Blogged by Brad on 1/16/2006 @ 12:11pm PT...

EXCLUSIVE: Sibel Edmonds Lauds Gore Speech Calling for New Whistleblower Legislation
FBI Whistleblower on Necessity of Protections for Government 'Truth-Tellers'

The BRAD BLOG has obtained a statement from "Gag Ordered" FBI Whistleblower, Sibel Edmonds, Founder and Director of the National Security Whistleblowers Coaltion , in response to Al Gore's just...

The BRAD BLOG has obtained a statement from "Gag Ordered" FBI Whistleblower, Sibel Edmonds, Founder and Director of the National Security Whistleblowers Coaltion, in response to Al Gore's just completed speech earlier today in Washington D.C.

Gore's address, sponsored by a bi-partisan coalition, warned that our "constitution is in grave danger" and called for, amongst many other things (highlights of speech here), the creation of new Whistleblower Protections for members of the Executive Branch and others.

Edmonds, due to a rarely invoked "State Secrets" privilege by the Dept. of Justice, is legally barred from discussing remarkable and troubling findings she made as an FBI translator after 9/11, in regard to a number of explosive matters of national security.

She emailed the following statement to The BRAD BLOG moments ago:



The National Security Whistleblowers Coalition applauds Mr. Gore for his nonpartisan speech which very eloquently and sincerely expresses our core American values based on the notions of liberty and justice.

As stated by Mr. Gore, without whistleblowers the public would never know of the many abuses of constitutional rights by the government. Whistleblowers, Truth-Tellers, are responsible for the disclosure that President George W. Bush ordered unconstitutional surveillance of American citizens. These constitutional lifeguards take their patriotic oaths to heart and soul: Rather than complying with classification and secrecy orders designed to protect officials engaging in criminal conduct, whistleblowers choose to risk their livelihoods and the wrath of their agencies to get the truth out.

We applaud the call by Liberty Coalition & Al Gore for congress to enact new legislation that would provide meaningful whistleblower protections, especially for those patriots who report abuses of Executive Branch authority in the sensitive areas of national security. Hundreds of national security whistleblowers, patriotic government employees, have brought to the public’s attention cases of agency wrongdoing only to find themselves fired, stripped of their security clearance, and/or deprived of meaningful work, simply because they were courageous and patriotic enough to place the security of our nation above their own career security and interests.

Why should government employees have to choose between their livelihood and career, and fulfilling their highest duty of all: protecting the public’s interest?

The answer is very simple, because our legislative branch has failed to provide these patriots with any protection.

Whistleblowers have served as a constant and valuable check on the federal government. Considering the fact that to perform its legislative & oversight functions, congress must depend on information from the executive branch, why is it that the congress refuses to provide a safe & protected channel to those who can provide the congress with information, thus enable it to exercise its oversight responsibility?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 03:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good Find gj
:kick: :applause: :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReadTomPaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 03:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. She's a perfect example of why this protection is so sorely needed.
What she's learned alone could have brought down the Bush administration in anything resembling a sane environment. It still might.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 03:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. if only the courts were not so corrupt and fascists... NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReadTomPaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 03:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yes it's quite a view they have taken regarding her revelations..
She exposes corruption that goes the core of two governmental branches, and rather than take action the judiciary decides it's the corruption that must be protected from scrutiny, since it's such an explosive set of discoveries.

That's like a doctor telling you that they won't operate because they don't want to interfere with the well being of your cancerous tumors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 03:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. great analogy n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Hopefully it will be her cases that have been covered up will help impeach
... not only Bush, but also help impeach some of these justices/judges (Walton?) that helped cover up his actions by their rulings to reinforce this coverup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. fingers crossed! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pauldp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 03:06 AM
Response to Original message
4. kick nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
7. ==
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
10. It's a good thing the bastards can't stop her from
giving her political opinion yet.

Kicked and nominated.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. We really need the gag-order removed from Sibel > she's too important
and must be heard!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC