Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Would you vote for this candidate?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 11:07 AM
Original message
Would you vote for this candidate?
QUOTES ON RACE:

"If you have ever been robbed by a black teen-aged male, you know how unbelievably fleet-footed they can be."

"Opinion polls consistently show that only about 5 percent of blacks have sensible political opinions, i.e., support the free market, individual liberty and the end of welfare and affirmative action."

"Politically sensible blacks are outnumbered as decent people... I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal."

"We don't think a child of 13 should be held responsible as a man of 23. That's true for most people, but black males age 13 who have been raised on the streets and who have joined criminal gangs are as big, strong, tough, scary and culpable as any adult and should be treated as such."

He also voted against awarding Rosa Parks a Congressional Gold Medal.


VIEWS ON THE US GOVERNMENT:

"With the disintegration of the Soviet Union, we too should consider it. Why not think about getting rid of the federal government, returning to the system of our Founders and breaking up the United States into smaller government units?"

VIEWS ON DISASTER ASSISTANCE AND KATRINA RECOVERY EFFORTS:

Consistently voted against funding to FEMA over the last decade, even though he lives on the Gulf Coast.
Voted against aid package for Katrina victims.
"Katrina also has exposed the failed welfare policies of the past 60 years. In New Orleans, hundreds of thousands of impoverished citizens lacked any resources to safeguard their families and their property from the storm. Virtually everyone who stayed behind was poor. It is time to recognize that government assistance over several generations did not eradicate poverty in New Orleans, but rather created a deadly form of dependency on government."

VIEWS ON ABORTION and/or STEM CELL RESEARCH (not close to the same thing, but they are linked on research pages):

Voted NO on allowing human embryonic stem cell research. (May 2005)
Voted YES on banning partial-birth abortion except to save mother’s life. (Oct 2003)
Voted YES on funding for health providers who don't provide abortion info. (Sep 2002)
Voted YES on banning Family Planning funding in US aid abroad. (May 2001)
Rated 0% by NARAL, indicating a pro-life voting record. (Dec 2003)
In 2006 he introduced H.R. 776 to have Congress declare that life exists at conception and to prevent federal courts from claiming jurisdiction over cases involving abortion.

ON GAY RIGHTS AND MARRIAGE:

In a 2004 speech before Congress he expressed support for the Federal Defense of Marriage Act and expressed his support for the Marriage Protection Act as an alternative to the FMA <23>.
In 1999 he voted for H.R. 2587 that banned gay couples from adopting children in the District of Columbia.

ON VOTING RIGHTS:

In 2004 he spoke out against efforts to abolish the Electoral College, stating that such a reform would weaken the "voting power of pro-liberty states."

In 2002 spoke before the Congress in opposition to campaign finance reforms that place any restrictions on citizens and businesses making campaign contributions to the candidate of their choice on First Amendment grounds.

ON CIVIL RIGHTS:

"The Civil Rights Act of 1964 not only violated the Constitution and reduced individual liberty; it also failed to achieve its stated goals of promoting racial harmony and a color-blind society. Federal bureaucrats and judges cannot read minds to see if actions are motivated by racism. Therefore, the only way the federal government could ensure an employer was not violating the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was to ensure that the racial composition of a business's workforce matched the racial composition of a bureaucrat or judge's defined body of potential employees. Thus, bureaucrats began forcing employers to hire by racial quota. Racial quotas have not contributed to racial harmony or advanced the goal of a color-blind society. Instead, these quotas encouraged racial balkanization, and fostered racial strife."

"...the Civil Rights Act of 1964 did not improve race relations or enhance freedom. Instead, the forced integration dictated by the Civil Rights Act of 1964 increased racial tensions while diminishing individual liberty."

This candidate has a rating of 52% by the NAACP (up from 33%), 38% by the Leadership Council on Civil Rights, 0% from National Council of La Raza, and 25% from the Council on Human Rights.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. There's not enough money on earth to make me vote for that. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. Course not...
Edited on Tue Jul-11-06 11:15 AM by SteppingRazor
I wouldn't vote for Ron Paul or any other Republican (I knew who it was at the first quote -- that one's famous). Why even ask though? Do you really think there's anybody on DU who's going to say, "Why, yes, I believe that man would be an outstanding candidate!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Apparently there are, based on responses in a locked thread from last nigh
There were a couple of adamant defenders of Paul.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Really? Can you gimme a link?
I don't doubt you, I just want to read these people's posts and see what the hell they're thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. nope! (and I know who it is...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. First dozen words settled it for me - That would be a doubt it
It would take a hell of a message to change my mind otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC