Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Divided Republicans: "Bushism as a philosophy has yet to establish itself"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 07:24 AM
Original message
Divided Republicans: "Bushism as a philosophy has yet to establish itself"
Now it's the Republicans who are divided
No signs of the GOP unity of Reagan years


By E. J. DIONNE
Syndicated Columnist
July 11. 2006
http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060711/REPOSITORY/607110317/1028/OPINION02

As it looks beyond the elections of 2006, a Republican Party known for ideological solidarity is on the cusp of a far more searching philosophical battle than are the Democrats, historically accustomed to bruising fights over the finer points of political theory.

The coming Republican brawl reflects the fact that President Bush will leave office with no obvious heir, and Bushism as a political philosophy has yet to establish itself in the way Reaganism did.

The battle for the future defies each party's self-image. In this year's elections, Republicans are painting the Democrats as divided, especially on Iraq and national security, and themselves as united behind a strategy of "victory in the war on terror."

But beneath this year's slogans, Republicans are decidedly mixed in their view of the Bush years, and each of their leading presidential candidates proposes important breaks with the Bush approach.


article: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060711/REPOSITORY/607110317/1028/OPINION02
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Only in these times could corruption, arrogance, myopia, and dogmatism
be confused with a putative "philosophy."

Bush has no philosophy but to pillage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niccolos_smile Donating Member (203 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Agreed. This sullies the name of philosophy.

These people are not lovers of wisdom, seekers of wisdom, or anything else related to wisdom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kip Humphrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. One-Party authoritarian rule or principled conservatism. What a dilemna
I'll bet Nazism wins. Power corrupts and absolute power...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. Well, they chose Ann Coulter to represent them...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
4. I suggest a different model, instead of a foundation that persists
Edited on Tue Jul-11-06 08:14 AM by kenny blankenship
once "established", think of a disease like herpes or leprosy--something that flares up hideously for a while, burns out after a while, but keeps coming back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
5. I beg to differ
Bushism is well-established as a complete disaster economically, diplomatically, and humanitarianly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. And was OPERATIONALIZED by every Republican congressional member
who voted on measures to actively implement it or passively through deciding not to exercise oversight. Nail them to this cross! Every election! Hang the * albatross around their necks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
6. Well they really need to present their next candidate as a break from
the bush years. President Bush hasn't been a success. So they will either go for a more conservative candidate (someone who will actually cut the budget for example) or they will go for a "moderate" like McCain or Guilliani.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastic cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
7. Perhaps it's because the term "Bushism" has a decidedly
different meaning to most of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC