Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Seventeen Democrats voted for NYT resolution; THIS MEANS WAR!!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 06:53 PM
Original message
Seventeen Democrats voted for NYT resolution; THIS MEANS WAR!!!!
Edited on Thu Jun-29-06 07:17 PM by originalpckelly
Anyone who would fall for a Republican ploy and endanger the fundamental values of our party and our country is no less than a traitor. Join the Republicans if you were for this. This is ridiculous and inexcusable. I know we all don't agree, and in fact that is why we are better than the Republicans, but this was a political ploy specifically aimed at "getting out" the Republican base. These people will suffer severe consequences for this betrayal.

*Correction: SEVENTEEN!!!!!!!!

They are:
Barrow
Bean
Boren
Boswell
Cuellar
DeFazio
Edwards
Gordon
Higgins
Marshall
Matheson
Melancon
Peterson
Ross
Salazar
Skelton
Taylor

Source (Clerk of The House):
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2006/roll357.xml#Y
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Who were they let me guess one name...Lieberwhore....?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. No this was the House...
and it is completely fucking inexcusable!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I am in agreement with you...we need to get them out...
they are worthless...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. When 8 Republicans vote against this...
you know it's pretty bad when 17 Democrats in our party do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. No. This was a stupid House resolution that means NOTHING. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. This is probably one of the worst things...
I have ever seen Dinos do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. please list the seven.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I will when I get the roll call...
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Roll call is out and I am now officially on the war path!
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Who are they? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. I put it in the original post.
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sequoia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. I wrote a letter to the editor
telling them not to give up and stand for freedom of the press.

E-mail: [email protected]

• Phone: (212) 556-7652

• Address: Public Editor
The New York Times
229 West 43rd St.
New York, NY 10036-3959
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. DAMN--one of my idiots is on that list--phone call first thing in morning.
and his brother voted for the flag-burning amendment. I keep telling ken that if we had wanted a conservative catholic repuke, we could have voted for pete coors. time to yell at brother, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Salazar?
I will definitely be protesting them. Thank GOD I have DeGette for my Congresswoman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. right!!--I didn't realize you were here in CO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Condolence on your Congressman...
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demoiselle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
34. Isn't Ken Salazar a Senator?
I thought this was a House resolution. (?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. No, it's Ken's brother John...
he is a member (in more than one way, think DICK) of the House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demoiselle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. I'm wrong..It must be John Salazar, who IS a congressman. Sorry. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
12. There were even 8 Republicans who voted against this!!!!
Edited on Thu Jun-29-06 07:13 PM by originalpckelly
That means these people are more in line with radical Republicans than members of the Republican's own party!!!!! :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
18. They need their asses kicked (in the figurative sense)...
perhaps in the literal one too. That's just embarassing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
19. These people ought to be very ashamed of themselves...
I understand that we all don't walk in line, and that is why we are better than Republicans, but this was a ploy for the Republicans. There aren't words to describe this betrayal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. you got that right, they've got be freepers in disguise
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Well this showed their true color...
red.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
22. Cheney can wiretap at will and has been for a long, long time.
He probably has 'something' on most everyone in D.C.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
23. Bush wouldn't even BE in the white house without the NY Times
I hope The Times kicks ass... but I also hope this costs those fuckers a fortune in legal fees.

When you lie down with Repukes, you wake-up with indictments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. This isn't just about the NYT...
is about the press in general. The Republicans are seriously out to get the only check upon the executive. Without the press the Bushies would have free reign, they know that and probably encouraged the leaks to torpedo the times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
24. Pathetic. I'm surprised by DeFazio.
I thought he was a liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. I think there are a few people...
on that list no one expected. All I can say is: deep shit. :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NI4NI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
27. Many parts of the resolution
Edited on Thu Jun-29-06 07:50 PM by NI4NI
which Dems tried unsuccessfully to amend, before they voted against it, also declared that Bush was doing a good job on terror! What kind of Democrat would vote for that?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
28. Do those jackasses realize
that * had been boasting about the program covered in the Times since 2001? How about the LA Times and the GOP-mouthpiece Wall Street Journal, which published the same story at the same time?


Ugh...fucking sellout souless bastards. Turn in your credentials at the door and let's get some REAL Democrats in the People's House!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
29. Most of them are members of the "Bluedog Coalition"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patcox2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
30. They have to get elected by the people in their districts.
Does anyone want to try to undrestand that? These guys are most likely hanging on by a thread in redneck infested parts of the country. The resolution is meaningless anyway. They get a chance to get some redneck cred on something that doesn't matter anyway, and then maybe we, we as in us democrats, get to hold on to those 17 seats and we stay close enough to maybe take the house in November.

Compromise is ugly, politics can be ugly, but I'd rather take the house with a democratic party that has some compromisers than lose it with lockstep ideological purity.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. When the NYT was complicit in the propaganda for
invading Iraq the Bush Regime didn't voice any complaints but now the NYT is on the hit list. Dems that voted for this crap should be voted out.

In fact, I believe that all Progressives should join the Green Party. ;0)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
32. Does anyone know how many, or if any, are up for re-election now?
Edited on Thu Jun-29-06 10:05 PM by Emit
On edit, looks like the majority are up for re-election. The only ones I found who are not, or who I couldn't tell from their websites were Boren, Gordon and Marshall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tyedyeto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. Every member of the House is up for re-election this year
Edited on Thu Jun-29-06 11:09 PM by tyedyeto
unless they have specifically stated they are not seeking re-election.

on edit:

The Constitution states that House of Representatives shall be subject to the election process every two years. In the Senate, one third is up for re-election every two years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
33. DeFazio???!!!#$%^& You have got to be kidding me!
Bean is already on my shit list. She's useless. Taylor. Is that Taylor from Mississippi? Gene Taylor? I wonder? If so, that's VERY disappointing.:( What a bunch of ASSHOLES!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC