Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Wars Force Army Equipment Costs to Triple"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 11:52 AM
Original message
"Wars Force Army Equipment Costs to Triple"
WASHINGTON (AP) - The annual cost of replacing, repairing and upgrading Army equipment in Iraq and Afghanistan is expected to more than triple next year to more than $17 billion, according to Army documents obtained by the Associated Press.

From 2002 to 2006, the Army spent an average of $4 billion a year in annual equipment costs. But as the war takes a harder toll on the military, that number is projected to balloon to more than $12 billion for the federal budget year that starts next Oct. 1, the documents show.

The $17 billion also includes an additional $5 billion in equipment expenses that the Army requested in previous years but has not yet been provided.

The latest costs include the transfer of more than 1,200 2 1/2-ton trucks, nearly 1,100 Humvees and $8.8 million in other equipment from the U.S. Army to the Iraqi security forces.

http://apnews1.iwon.com/article/20060627/D8IGMQOO0.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. Where's Dom DeLouise when you need him!?
TREASURE BATH! TREASURE BATH! TREASURE BATH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. Transferring 2,300 heavy vehicles to Iraq huh..
We're not ever leaving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. A lot of that is to do with the fact
that sand f*cks most things were were not designed for that environment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. More for the
Military Industrial complex! AKA Corporate welfare!!! At least the discussion is about such things as trucks and humvees (which do wear out and I.E.D's take a toll along the sand) and not razzle dazzle high tech stuff like our really unneeded F22 Raptor and such. Had an LTTE published today in the St. Louis Post -Dispatch on the GAO report on the Raptor, if anyone is interested.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC