Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So, uh, let me get this straight...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Craig3410 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 03:20 PM
Original message
So, uh, let me get this straight...
If we don't like what the Supreme Court says, we can basically tell them to fuck themselves and we can just simply make it law anyway?

Wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. In fucked-up Bushworld, yes we, or at least he, can....
:yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sure, as long as it is packed full of your hand picked cronies
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. Context? Links?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Craig3410 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. On CSPAN2..
He admitted that the SC voted that flagburning is free speech, but they're pushing the bill anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Who's "He"?
Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Craig3410 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Oh, sorry; Arlen Specter. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Craig3410 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. So, when the SC decides...
that something's in the Repukes' favor, they're the "law of the land"; if they don't, they're "unelected activist judges".

Fucking hypocrites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC