Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Trek Philosophy: This rung true for me in regards to the war.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
lildreamer316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 02:36 AM
Original message
Trek Philosophy: This rung true for me in regards to the war.
On the episode of TNG; Picard says to Crusher:"Beverly, the Prime Directive is not just a set of rules; it is a philosophy, and a very correct one. History's proved, again and again, that whenever mankind interferes with a less developed civilization, no matter how well-intentioned that interference may be, the results are disastrous."

Yes; I may get flamed for the perceived inference that a particular civilization we are in conflict with is "less developed"; but I really don't think that is an unrealistic assesment.
I just thought it was interesting.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
physioex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 03:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. Oh I completely agree......
Funny how much of what we learnt on Star Trek that is almost twenty years old is true. Not to mention the original series which was also right on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 03:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. That's not twenty years old!
Star Trek TNG came out in.. oh..

1989?

When Star Trek 4 debuted, huh?

I'm beginning to feel old. Or actually, I'm about as old as it, but it doesn't seem like it. Something I grew up with ya know? Memories..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
physioex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 03:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Earlier than 89.....
Think it was 87.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 04:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. The Prime Directive was in the original series in the 1960's
which was 40 years ago.

I just looked up "Prime Directive" on wikipedia and was startled by this:

The Prime Directive was not actually written into law until some years after the formation of the Federation — in the Original Series episode "A Piece of the Action", an early Federation ship visits a primitive planet and leaves behind several items which alter the planet's culture significantly (as did the book Chicago Mobs of the Twenties, which the inhabitants quickly seized upon as a blueprint for their entire society).

Well this administration seems to be using Orwell's 1984 as a blueprint,
another case of Star Trek predicting the future!

In real life, the creation of the Prime Directive is generally credited to Gene L. Coon, although there is some contention as to whether science fiction writer Theodore Sturgeon, who wrote of the Prime Directive in an unused script for the original series, actually came up with it first. (In fact, the Prime Directive appears fully-formed as much as two decades earlier in Robert A. Heinlein's 1948 novel Space Cadet, which describes a military organization very similar to Star Trek's Starfleet). The Prime Directive closely mirrors the zoo hypothesis explanation for the Fermi paradox.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_directive

So the Prime Directive actually goes back to 1948, almost 60 years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 05:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. The best sci-fi writers have always been good students of anthropology
The Prime Directive is just one of the best-known instances. Disobeying the PD brings you into the realm of the Law of Unintended Consequences.

I understand where the OP was going with this, I think. We don't have to posit Iraq as a "less developed civilization" -- especially since that region is known as the Cradle of Civilization -- for either the Law of Unintended Consequences or the Prime Directive to apply.

Our government -- that is, Bush-Cheney-Rummy-Rove -- got us into this mess by willfull ignorance and sheer pig-headedness. They really had no idea what they were stepping into and they refused all coherent and informed advice. Now we're in a desert version of Vietnam, roundly despised by the very people we told our troops we would be helping.

I appreciate the Star Trek reference, btw. I loved the old black and white version -- it was pioneering tv. People of a certain age will remember television's very first interracial kiss was on Star Trek; but everything they did was rooted in written SF that had been well-developed over the preceding two generations.

Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Good lord.. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. That was the creator, Gene Roddenberry's genius.
Even though the Starfleet was run according to military principles, they had evolved into explorers and peacekeepers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
physioex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Ohh...I love the show.....
I think it is a very advanced concept, but some argue that is also a bit idealistic. That there is no dark side to our technological pursuits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. There was in the show a dark side to technological pursuits.
There were a few shows that indicated that traveling at warp speed was changing the fabric of the universe and they had to address it. It's been awhile and I don't remember the details but I think if you can access all the shows you will find it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
physioex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-24-06 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. LMAO.....
Ofcourse I remember that episode. I think all ships were restricted to warp 5 unless of emergencies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezra the Prankster Donating Member (67 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'd just like to add...
...That whoever said TV has nothing to do with real life is fooling themselves. TV, or movies, or theatre, or literature, succeeds by being understandable to human audiences. Fiction isn't fiction at all, it's simply highly condensed reality projected onto a hypothetical situation. The best science fiction writers aren't just anthropolgists, they're prophets!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. The prime directive was more than that. It was about not
interfering with any civilization, no matter how different than ours, and no matter how hard it may be not to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
10. As a devoted Trekie
It has always been easier to destroy that to create" -- Spock
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC