Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Special counsel: Cheney may be called to testify

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 05:40 AM
Original message
Special counsel: Cheney may be called to testify
Prosecutor says vice president’s ‘state of mind’ relevant in CIA leak case

Updated: 12:59 a.m. ET May 25, 2006
WASHINGTON - Vice President Dick Cheney could be called to testify in the perjury case against his former chief of staff, a special prosecutor said in a court filing Wednesday.

Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald suggested Cheney would be a logical government witness because he could authenticate notes he jotted on a July 6, 2003, New York Times opinion piece by a former U.S. ambassador critical of the Iraq war.

Fitzgerald said Cheney’s “state of mind” is “directly relevant” to whether I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby, the vice president’s former top aide, lied to FBI agents and a federal grand jury about how he learned about CIA officer Valerie Plame’s identity and what he subsequently told reporters.

<snip>
Let’s get everything out’
In his grand jury testimony, Libby said Cheney was so upset about Wilson’s allegations that they discussed them daily after the article appeared. “He was very keen to get the truth out,” Libby testified, quoting Cheney as saying, “Let’s get everything out.”

Cheney viewed Wilson’s allegations as a personal attack because the article suggested that the vice president knew that Wilson had discounted old reports that Iraq had tried to buy uranium yellowcake from Niger to build a nuclear weapon.


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12961060/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 05:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. Fitz is getting two for one with this comment:


Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald suggested Cheney would be a logical government witness because he could authenticate notes he jotted on a July 6, 2003, New York Times opinion piece by a former U.S. ambassador critical of the Iraq war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 06:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. Good. Get the bastard under oath.
Ask lots and lots and lots of questions about every meeting, every e-mail, every memo.:7 :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandrakae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. Oh please, you mean LIEIFY. There Dick Cheney helped created a new word.
Why even bother. They will never got the truth out of that arrogant bastard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Then maybe Ftiz can trap his ass into a blatant lie...
I'd like to see that. Remember, he and the Chimp have already met with Fitz at least once, so maybe it's already happened...hey I can dream, can't I?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. Here are all 3 PDF Court Filings from last night - finally together
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
6. I love the thought that Cheney may actually have to answer questions under
oath!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC