Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TOON: Tom Tomorrow (Good Grief, Porter Goss!)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 11:45 PM
Original message
TOON: Tom Tomorrow (Good Grief, Porter Goss!)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
amitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. So...this cartoon is pretty much the story of our lives now,
;( (Is this a sad smilie, or a badly-aged smilie? You be the judge!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. To quote Charlie Brown: >sigh...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. ack. that's exactly how i feel about the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. nominated ...that football has been pulled out from us so many times
I feel like Charlie Brown sometimes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. The crazy media, how Tom began:
What was the catalyst that made you turn from making generalized social statements to depicting actual political figures?

Tom Tomorow: A very specific incident during the first Gulf War: I was out at a protest march in San Francisco—more than 100,000 people filling the streets as far as the eye could see. I got home and turned on the TV, and it just got the briefest mention on the news, and was immediately countered with a small demonstration in favor of the war—a dozen people in some suburban bedroom community. I called the TV station and yelled at an answering machine. And then suddenly I realized that I had this soapbox; politics had been creeping into it more and more, but somehow, I hadn't really made the conceptual leap into thinking of it as a political cartoon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Gee-frickin-nyus.
Tom Tomorrow is the Patrick Fitzgerald of cartoonists.


Recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nostradammit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Ah yes, good analogy!
Tom Tomorrow makes it so painfully, hysterically obvious.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
6. Why is Lucy calling General Hayden "Charlie Brown"? Is that his code name?
Sure as hell should've been Goss's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
7. A little side-note. Tom did actually meet Charles Schulz, and if i
remember the story correctly, Schulz encouraged Tom (actually Dan Perkins).
Dan counts Charles Schulz as a huge influence, as well as MAD magazine. (Hey, i liked MAD magazine too).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. another little side note...
When I was about 11, one of my friend's Grandfather taught me to draw Charlie Brown, Snoopy, Linus and Lucy. Turns out he used to work with Shultz, many years earlier. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorPlum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
11. I love This Modern World, but
I also have to wonder if Dan will be such a f*ing a** to Gore if runs again. He was a real "a pox on both of their houses" retard in the 2000 election.

Gore was depicted as a robot, complete with *click* *whirr* sounds.

Way to buy into the stupid media narrative on that one, Dan.

I for one share much of his political point of view, but I was not so stupid that I pretended their was no difference between Bush and Gore. The contrast was stark, and that the freak was allowed within stealing distance of the 2000 election is owed in great part to the death by 1,000 cuts that Gore suffered, from people like Tom Tomorrow.

Let's hope he gets and keeps his act together in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. He didn't like Gore? gore, the man with such clear judgement that
he nominated Joe Lieberman as his running mate?
Gore, who supported deadly sanctions on Iraq, and the bombing of Iraq, while he was v.p.?
Gore, who was in an administration that signed the telecommuncations act... of behalf of the big boys in the telecommunications industry?
Gore, in the administration that gutted the safety net for the poor in a way that Reagan only dreamed?

That Gore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorPlum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Please don't pretend that in 2000, even with all the problems that
Clinton and Gore had (I share your anger, especially about the telecom bill), that it wasn't obvious that Bush was a far worse choice. I was unhappy with a lot of what the Clinton administration was involved in, but not to the point of wondering whether I should vote for someone who was obviously a total puppet and tool for already dangerously powerful corporations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. And in 2000 the most-certainly upcominging Supreme Court choices...
should have made it clear that having a Republican in office to make the nominations - possibly THREE of them - was extremely worrisome. I would argue that Dan was hoping that through his effort he might make a BETTER Gore candidate, but it was too risky to be buying into the false conventional wisdom of the time that there was no difference between the candidates - we'd heard that crap before and he should have known better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC