Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Orange roughy going extinct.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 12:39 PM
Original message
Orange roughy going extinct.
Fish stocks in international waters are being plundered to the point of extinction, a leading conservationist group has said.

"Given the perilous overall state of marine fisheries resources and the continuing threats posed to the marine environment from over-fishing and damaging fishing activity, the need for action is immediate," Simon Cripps, director of WWF's global marine programme, said.

Illegal fishing "by highly mobile fleets under the control of multinational companies" was identified as one of the worst threats to marine life.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4996268.stm

So what part of "illegal" do these corporations not understand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dmkinsey Donating Member (789 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. the oceans will be exploited until there's nothing left
It's really depressing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Endless resources - the oceans have it all for us to plunder
First the fish, then all the oil.

Pretty soon we'll be able to swim anywhere without a fear of being attacked by sharks.

Of course fishing will be a sport as dead as hunting dodo birds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
godhatesrepublicans Donating Member (343 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. hey, dry land has been exploited to death for 1000s of years, ...
... why should the oceans fare any better? As a species, humanity has been a lousy steward of the planet. When we primates lose our grip on the planet, I wish the next species to develop and dominate better luck with it.

I'm hoping it turns out to be squirrels. They seem like responsible mammals. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coventina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I just hope we don't take down the whole planet with us.
Which is very likely......

:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
godhatesrepublicans Donating Member (343 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Nah, the planet recovered from what took out the dinosaurs, ...
... it'll recover from us. HUMANITY is screwed, but the Earth will be fine. Oddly enough I take some comfort in that. Not enough to forget about the drowning polar bears and the extinction of the Bengal Tiger, but it does help.

As trite as it is, I'll swipe a quote from The Matrix I always think of when I watch nature shows. You know the one.

“I’d like to share with you a revelation, I’ve had during my time here. It came to me when I tried to classify your species that I realized you aren’t actually mammals. Every mammal on this planet instinctively develops a natural equilibrium with its surrounding environment, but you humans do not. You move to an area and you multiply, and multiply until every natural resource is consumed. The only way you can survive is to spread to another area. There is another organism on this planet that follows the same pattern. Do you know what it is? A virus. Human beings are a disease, a cancer of this planet. You are a plague, and we...are the cure.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChickMagic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
23. Squibbons!
I watched a Discovery Channel episode where they postulated future species.
Flish were pretty cool. Land dwelling squid were squibbons brachiating
from tree to tree. I vote for squibbons!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tatertop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. They were originally called Slimehead
The name Orange roughy is a marketing ploy.
Likewise, the Patagonian toothfish is now called
the Chilean Sea Bass.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Yep. And 30 years ago they were junk fish - the stuff you threw
back because it was worthless.

But having all but wiped out the tuna and cod and whatever we turned to the junk fish like slimehead and toothfish and swordfish, and now are wiping them out, too.

We need a 10 year moratorium on all commercial fishing. Worldwide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tatertop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Poor Patagonian toothfish! (He never did anything wrong.)
Looks like we just cannot wait to empty the oceans.
Wonder where we'll be at in ten years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #11
26. fishing down the food chain ... (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChickMagic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
24. Monkfish
are Angler fish butts. Monkfish just has a better
marketing ring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. The US ought to ban imports of orange roughy
Every time I see OR fillets in the supermarket, I think "Passenger Pigeon"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GDAEx2 Donating Member (381 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. Missing from the BBC article is the fact that...
...Orange Roughy do not reach sexual maturity until they are between 23 and 40 years of age.
You don't suppose that has anything to do with the depletion of the fishery, do you? :banghead:
link: http://www.forestandbird.org.nz/bestfishguide/species/orangeroughy.asp

<>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. Usually the orange roughy sold in the supermarkets are farm-raised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Well, that's good, I'll still be able to buy, cook and eat it!
Orange Roughy is yummy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
godhatesrepublicans Donating Member (343 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. How? they take 20 years to hit puberty!
I'm not disputing you, but what do they do, hormone the hell out of them? And if so, eeeewww!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. They must do something to speed up growth.
Because I have seen packages marked farm-raised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
godhatesrepublicans Donating Member (343 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. then you're braver than I am for eating it! :-)
Jeez, I have to google this when I have time. And people worry about hormones in milk and chicken...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. farm raised also endangers wild fish
Edited on Fri May-19-06 02:19 PM by pitohui
don't know the deal w. orange roughy but w. atlantic salmon the farm-raised salmon has actually become a source of disease that infects the few remaining pure wild stocks -- also the farm-raised salmon are fed 3 (some sources have said 6 but i'll quote the more conservative quote) times their weight in other fish to produce one pound of salmon so they are not an efficient or sustainable source of seafood

people won't stop eating their salmon tho, sigh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. Nonsense - there is no such thing as farm-raised OR
Edited on Fri May-19-06 02:49 PM by jpak
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
13. the tragedy of the commons
i see no hope of saving the oceans alas, yes, need for action is immediate but who is going to stop these pirates?

greenpeace and world wildlife fund? bless their hearts, they don't stand a chance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. Greenpeace needs some armed nuclear submarines & a license to kill
That would be awesome, altho not terribly greenpeaceful
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. I was gonna say . . .
defeats the "peace" part! But maybe they should review their mission. . .

The Greenguerillas?

Greenattack?

Greensword - get it? Greensward? huh

Earth Liberation Front is already taken.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. GreenSword is a cool name, but GreenAttack is vicious!
either will do, but with the latter, you definitely got to capitalize the S, lest people read "greens word", which would be dumb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BreweryYardRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. Any militant anti-fishery groups out there?
I might be willing to sign on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
16. Bottom Trawling
Companies that continue to pursue this form of fishing are bordering on being criminal. Senator Stevens from alaska has a vested interest in maintaining this fishery. His son Ben Stevens is part owner of a small fleet of bottom trawlers. The bottom trawls destroy the ocean floor as they are dragged along. Completely different from hook and line fishing which makes up the great portion of Alaskan bottom fisheries. Hook and line catch individual fish without causing total devestation to the bottom. When you drag a huge trawl along the bottom you destroy everything in it's path and catch many endangered species that would not otherwise be caught with hook and line. It is very easy to target specific species with hook and line but Trawls take everything there is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. Yes, there are pics at the link of results.
Bottom trawling is just bad for everyone and everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamarama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
20. Extinction...its what's for dinner. eot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamison Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
28. Just another ill caused by overpopulation.
These fish are paying the price of extinction because there are too many human mouths to feed on this planet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC