Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A new unit of measurement

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 08:27 PM
Original message
A new unit of measurement
Edited on Thu May-11-06 08:28 PM by mcscajun
Much as we have
Kelvin = SI base unit of temperature, named for Lord Kelvin
Newton = SI unit of force, named for Sir Isaac Newton
Pascal = SI unit of pressure, named for Blaise Pascal

I now propose, Bush = SI unit of stupidity.

As the stupidity of the namesake is truly staggering, I propose that measures be taken in fractional units.

Fox Wingnut and "Idjit" Hannity might be said to possess .625 Bush Units, for example; Ann Coulter, the self-styled "constiutional lawyer", might have a whopping .793 Bush Units.

DU mathematicians and DU scientists, please weigh in.

With some minor tweaking, I think this could catch on. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dunvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well the "bush" is definately a "base" unit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ha!
:spray:

I shoulda seen THAT one coming. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oh, like Russ Feingold contains one pico-Bush?
An atto-Bush?

I like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yes! I like the "pico-" idea better than silly decimals.
Edited on Thu May-11-06 08:46 PM by mcscajun
:)

pico-Bush

like micrograms...

We could post pico-Bush values for RWingnuts and DINOs, like Joe LIEberman

(The "atto-Bush" sounds too much like "attaboy" for me.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. We speak of BTUs, so
maybe a BSU (Bush Stupidity Unit) could catch on, especially given the added bonus of the juxtaposition of the letters B and S.


:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. So long as no one confuses it with Boise State University.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Hey, the folks at Boise State are the LAST people I want to anger.
Idaho, I salute you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. The BSU has real potential!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ioo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. I have some questions...
So is Bush 1.000?

Can you be dumber than Bush, I mean can you have a 1.092, meaning that this person is .092 stuipider than Bush?

Is there a top, like is the most stupid thing in the world, say a rat, is that a 1.5?

If Bush did something unlikely, like a smart thing, does a BU change? Do others Change as well?

I like this, but I need to know the rules
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yes, Bush is the 1.00 measure.
Edited on Thu May-11-06 08:52 PM by mcscajun
And I don't envision this as the top, so yes, there could be a 1.092.

I'm not sure if there is a ceiling yet for this measurement...studies must be done. Perhaps I can get a grant? :rofl: I could use the cash.

Nah...nothing Bush does can change his basic rating. Perhaps we need a subsidiary unit that can adjust for subtle fluctuations in the force. :)

Hope this helps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ioo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Thank you for the info, I will get to work on a graph or something... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I look forward to your results.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
13. Kick!
Shameless variety. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
U4ikLefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
14. Excellent!!! Nobody could actually reach a 1.0 Bush unit
unless they actally had full loss of conitive abilities. As an engineer, I love any new unit...kudos!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Thank you...
tyvm.

:)

No one in excess of 1.0? Hmmm...there goes my grant application. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ioo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. I agree, I am an Engineer as well, and I am seeing something here...
I agree kinda, it almost sounds like specific gravity mesures.

I do think SOME things are over 1.000 but I am thinking maybe only to 1.2, this would be maybe like a brain dead person, or Bill O'Reily....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Maybe you and Lefty can sort this thing out
and I can check results in the morning. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #20
33. Or maybe it's relativistic?
If b is the ideal limit of stupidity, relative stupidity is the square root of 1 - s^2 / b^2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Sounds like you and Ioo could get together on this one...
...the math is Just this shy of beyond me. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
linazelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
32. Bush himself = 1.0 units, he is the base. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. So far, that's the point. Bush is the 1.0 unit
all others get measure against him.

Ioo, being an engineer, is working on a scale. Should be interesting...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ioo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
15. I have a few more questions..
So if you give Hannity .625, so does that mean he is little smarter than Bush?

So 0.0 is a person that is not dumb at all...

Bush is say 1.000, and a single cell amoeba is say a .938, this would mean that the amoeba is a wee smarter than Bush?

What in your mind is say a 1.2?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. U4ikLefty has some issues with units in excess of 1.0
but yes, Hannity's proposed rating of .625 BU posits that Hannity is ever so slightly smarter than Bush.

I'm going back to the drawing board on the 1.092 concept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
U4ikLefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I believe that some may approach 1.0 Bush Units asympthotically, but
Edited on Thu May-11-06 09:30 PM by U4ikLefty
may never actaully reach 1.0 Bush Units. Sounds like a calclus problem in the making.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Aw, Hell! I never could find the area under the curve.
Edited on Thu May-11-06 09:31 PM by mcscajun
Or the dust bunnies under the bed. :rofl:

asympthotically? Easy for You to say, oh engineer. This lady never even took physics. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
U4ikLefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. LOL...don't worry. Calculating Bush's stupidity ratio is a tough job!!!
That's why they pay us engineers the big bucks!!! ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Very tough. Glad you and "Ioo" are on the case.
Edited on Thu May-11-06 09:37 PM by mcscajun
I've got to go to bed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
U4ikLefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Sweet Dreams!!! Thx for a great conversation piece. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ioo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. I need to think this out, I will have a scale soon, but I need to rest...
I need to think this out... I just do not see the BU as the same all the time... I need to think this out...

but yes thanks for the odd idea to noodle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
U4ikLefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Good deal Ioo. With 2 DU engineers on the case, we'll be calling ANSI
with a new standard in no time. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. In your calculations...
Edited on Fri May-12-06 05:54 PM by mcscajun
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #26
36. Where's the scale?
Or are you having too much fun on your weekend?

:nudge, nudge:

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. Yeah, it's like the speed of light...
E=M*C^2 - you can't ever get there.

Where:
Cf = clusterfuckism
Si = stupidity index
PoP = Pissed off public

PoP=Si*Cf^2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 05:35 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. Nice...
Edited on Fri May-12-06 05:35 AM by mcscajun
I was trying to think of equations just like Einstein's ever since Ioo mentioned changing events possibly changing Bush the namesake's Bush rating -- can't wait for the other engineers to get hold of yours.

One minor quibble -- you need to get the Bush (B or BU) in there. There must be equations where Newtons or Pascals are used for examples?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dunvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
29. Is anyone factoring in the the effect the atomic weight of "Evil" has...
...on the BSU?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Not sure, but this may be something Ioo is working on...
Heads up, Ioo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 04:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC