Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Russert Didn't Want to Testify in Plame Case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 08:25 PM
Original message
Why Russert Didn't Want to Testify in Plame Case
http://www.mediainfo.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp...

Not like we didn't suspect this already...

Why Russert Didn't Want to Testify in Plame Case

By E&P Staff

Published: January 10, 2006 9:55 AM ET

NEW YORK Lawyers for NBC News reporter Tim Russert suspected in the spring of 2004 that his testimony could hurt I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, and Russert resisted testifying at the time about private conversations with Libby, according to court papers released Monday, The Washington Post reports today.

"Russert was aware that a special prosecutor probing the leak of a CIA operative's name knew of his summer 2003 telephone conversation with Libby, and that Libby had released him from any promise of confidentiality," the Post's Carol D. Leonnig writes. But Russert and his attorneys "argued in previously sealed court filings in June 2004 that he should not have to tell a grand jury about that conversation, because it would harm Russert's relationship with other sources.

"Russert ultimately testified under oath about the conversation after a federal judge ordered him to do so in July 2004. The information Russert provided became important evidence that Special Counsel Patrick J. Fitzgerald used to indict Libby in October on five felony counts of lying to the FBI and a grand jury, and of obstruction of justice."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Democratic discussion forum
   Replies to this thread
  - Is there any professional society  tularetom   Jan-10-06 08:31 PM   #1 
  - The Society of Professional Journalists.  Clark2008   Jan-10-06 08:47 PM   #8 
  - I understand they arent a "profession" per se  tularetom   Jan-10-06 08:57 PM   #10 
  - like every other journalist Fitzgerald supoenaed  northzax   Jan-10-06 09:37 PM   #16 
  - Screw the country, screw the laws, huh Timmy? Especially when it  acmavm   Jan-10-06 08:32 PM   #2 
  - Russert simply didn't want to loose access  PerceptionManagement   Jan-10-06 08:34 PM   #3 
  - yes, it seems reporters need to establish a 'relationship'--getting in  rodeodance   Jan-10-06 08:38 PM   #4 
  - Gads, he might not be invited to cocktail parties!  havocmom   Jan-10-06 08:48 PM   #9 
  - What's really irksome is how much Pumpkinhead was lauded  babylonsister   Jan-10-06 08:43 PM   #5 
  - I read that at the Nurenburg trials, journalists were tried for war crimes  Trevelyan   Jan-10-06 08:45 PM   #6 
     - Now that's interesting....I didn't know that. n/t  Emit   Jan-10-06 08:46 PM   #7 
     - I didn't know that either.  A Simple Game   Jan-10-06 09:15 PM   #11 
     - Hans Fritszche  Ikonoklast   Jan-10-06 09:35 PM   #14 
        - someone should send this to Russert. n/t  Emit   Jan-10-06 09:53 PM   #17 
  - Big Corporations protecting their investments with lackeys they  0007   Jan-10-06 09:27 PM   #12 
  - Instead of the Emmy's, there should be a tv Hall of Shame.  tinfoilinfor2005   Jan-10-06 09:30 PM   #13 
     - Now there's an idea! n/t  Emit   Jan-10-06 09:35 PM   #15 
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is there any professional society
for reporters/commentators? If there is and if they're worth a shit they need to censure this big head bulgy eyed ho and do so publicly and repeatedly. All russert cared about was that he might get left off the list of invitees to cheney or rummys xmas party if they found out he ratted out "Scooter". He doesn't give a crap about his "fellow" journalists and his actions reflect poorly on the entire profession. They have a credibility problem as it is - they need to make a public spectacle of a high profile colleague to regain some respect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. The Society of Professional Journalists.
However, they don't have "censure" power since journalists aren't - and shouldn't be - licensed.

But, they could raise a public stink about it.

(I don't think you should license a profession that relies on creativity, as well as skill, even though, in this day and age, few nationally-known journalists are creative or skillful, but I'm sure you know what I mean)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I understand they arent a "profession" per se
but their society, simply by virtue of being journalists, could make certain that a rebuke of pumpkin head russert was drummed into the public consciousness. I agree that journalists should not be licensed like lawyers, engineers or doctors, even though as you point out today's "journalists" may as well join the Stenographer's Guild.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. like every other journalist Fitzgerald supoenaed
Russert fought the supoena. Every single one, that we know of. And when he lost the first round, he testified anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Screw the country, screw the laws, huh Timmy? Especially when it
comes to protecting your own fat ass and self-interests. I guess that's what you think should matter the most.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PerceptionManagement Donating Member (226 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Russert simply didn't want to loose access
Simple as that. And America Looses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. yes, it seems reporters need to establish a 'relationship'--getting in
good with the person------to get info. it ultimately censors what is said (on both sides0.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Gads, he might not be invited to cocktail parties!
Edited on Tue Jan-10-06 08:48 PM by havocmom
He might not be given the info the junta wants put on the air! Oh, the tradegy... he might have to start doing...::gulp:: investigative journalism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. What's really irksome is how much Pumpkinhead was lauded
for his integrity when he finally fessed up. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trevelyan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I read that at the Nurenburg trials, journalists were tried for war crimes
I read on Smirking Chimp that none were hung but I believe some served jail time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Now that's interesting....I didn't know that. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A Simple Game Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. I didn't know that either.
But what is more important, do the journalist of today know that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Hans Fritszche
Edited on Tue Jan-10-06 09:38 PM by Ikonoklast
Journalist that started out in newspaper. Recruited by Goebbels. Ended up as head of Nazi propaganda arm, "German Press Division", in charge of all print media in Nazi Germany.
Was aquitted by the Nuremburg tribunal, and immediately was arrested, tried, and convicted in German courts. Served nine years.

Odd fact resonating: He hosted a weekly political radio program early on. That got him noticed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. someone should send this to Russert. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
12. Big Corporations protecting their investments with lackeys they
own. Russert is corporate owned and can't do nothing but take orders. Only the ignorant believe Tim Russert is a non-partisan journalist.

Tim Russert is a flunky, an inferior, another junior! A big fat ass lackey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinfoilinfor2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
13. Instead of the Emmy's, there should be a tv Hall of Shame.
He would be my first nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Now there's an idea! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 23rd 2013, 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC