Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anthony Weiner’s “Bad Judgement”? That is So Not the Point

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Congress Donate to DU
 
sulphurdunn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-11 01:23 PM
Original message
Anthony Weiner’s “Bad Judgement”? That is So Not the Point
By Dr. Marty Klein

I wouldn’t want to be Rep. Anthony Weiner right now. Because everyone can see he’s conflicted about sex. But c’mon, aren’t you? Isn’t everyone?

As Somerset Maugham wrote almost a century ago, “There is hardly anyone whose sexual life, if it were broadcast, would not fill the world with surprise and horror.”

Would you want your mental sexual architecture exposed? Of course not.

And that’s the problem: Everyone in America is conflicted about sex. But only people with certain kinds of sexual conflict get caught.

Some people conflicted about sex never masturbate, never ask a woman what time it is just to stand next to her, never look at porn, never choose a table or subway seat based on who they get to look at, never fantasize when they walk past a dress shop, never read a romance novel, never think about what’s under those tight NFL pants, never look up old boyfriends on Facebook, never wear a plunging neckline, never own a vibrator, never smell their spouse’s underwear.

They never think of sex, feel little passion, and rarely do it.

Such people’s sexual conflicts are never exposed to public scrutiny, because they’re rarely acted out in ways we can easily see. But the internal crippling of sex phobias, the terror that one might not be 100% heterosexual, the rage against others’ sexual self-acceptance—these qualities in our public servants should concern us far more than the phone sex of Anthony Weiner, the love child of Arnold Schwarzenegger, and the prostitutes of David Vitter or Elliot Spitzer.

The problem with all the moralistic, self-satisfied, judgmental crap being thrown at, on, and around Anthony Weiner is that it affirms the idea that sex gets us in trouble—and that if we stay away from it, we’re OK. It affirms the idea that people who are conflicted about sex and act it out (in Weiner’s case, playfully, consensually, and—let’s remember—without meeting or touching) are somehow less trustworthy and less emotionally stable than people whose sexual conflicts leave them with frozen hearts, frozen bodies, and a complete lack of a paper trail. The grief of a spouse emotionally abandoned by a sex-phobe is always considered more acceptable than the grief of a spouse who’s been cheated on—a naïve and mean-spirited reading of human emotion.

I agree that Weiner did dumb things. But if you want to say the guy’s poor judgment disqualifies him from public office, you have to put that in context. You also have to talk about the poor judgment of public servants who, in private, beg Jesus to kill their sex drive, or beg a therapist to kill their fantasies, or brainwash their kids to be virgins at marriage, or, like St. Augustine, are intensely obsessed with the fundamentally dangerous nature of female sexuality. Does Anthony Weiner’s sexuality make him less trustworthy than St. Augustine’s tormented sexuality made him? I don’t think so.

The media (including the pretend-liberal Huffington Post), self-righteous members of both political parties, and many Americans continue to express their intense sense of betrayal by Weiner: “We thought we knew him.”

By that, people mean they thought they could safely assume Weiner’s sexuality was vanilla. Now they feel somehow violated because it isn’t. Much of the American public—and all of the media—seem to feel it has a right to expect vanilla sexuality from politicians, regardless of ideology or the lack of impact on their political behavior.

When non-vanilla behavior is exposed in public servants, people sanctimoniously complain about its content—the hookers or the multiple partners or the porn or the (duh) lying. If we hypothetically put aside such morally tainted content—is there any non-vanilla sex life a politician can have that’s acceptable to the public?

For example, what if a politician privately sends hot emails to his own wife? Takes explicit pictures of their monogamous bedroom activities and keeps them private? Or, with her encouragement, sends them to the couple’s best friend? No one’s hurt, no one complains, it’s all private. Does the desire to do this, or the willingness to do it, mean a public servant can’t be trusted?

Why not? And why is this worse than electing someone who, it turns out, believes that their sexual fantasies are going to damn them to everlasting hell?

America’s sex scandals (not the behavior, the “scandals”) are dangerous because they’re always about an interest in non-authorized sex, and because the lesson we’re always told they teach is that “too much” interest in sex, or “too little control” over our sexual impulses, or “too unusual” sexual desires are dangerous. And that the other kind of sexuality—one loaded down with guilt, shame, terror, and frigidity—is merely inconvenient, rather than a menace to society.

Anthony Weiner may be a flawed husband, but he’s no menace. Those who want to strip every bit of eroticism out of our governing classes are. At the very least, they should be honest about their intention, and quit hiding behind the skirts of “he has bad judgment.”



Dr. Marty Klein has been a sex educator for 30 years. He is the author of America’s War on Sex: The Attack on Law, Lust, and Liberty and blogs for Sexual Intelligence.
Posted 16:13PM on June 15 2011 by Jessica Constantine
Categories: 492, Ezine
Refresh | +3 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-11 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. His bad judgment is the whole point.
The texting stuff is just the trigger for his lame attempt to cover things up. That backfired, and now he has to resign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-11 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. An orchestrated political assassination.
Only possible with the participation of the easily distracted.

The Republicans couldn't have done it without you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-11 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. See this link:
http://journals.democraticunderground.com/MineralMan/15...

I defended Weiner strongly, until he admitted he was lying. Then I stopped defending him. Your mileage may vary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-11 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. I don't see how he's "conflicted about sex"....
...but what the hell did he expect was going to happen when the Twit twittered his tweeter? Bad Judgement!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
virgogal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-11 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. He's a damned liar. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sulphurdunn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-11 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Of course he's a damn liar.
Most politicians are damn liars, especially about money and sex. So, how does that make him different?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
virgogal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-11 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. It doesn't make him different. I was responding to the
OP which was about Weiner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sulphurdunn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-11 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I can appreciate
the disappointment caused by his lying. That's a rational response. I just have lots of trouble with sexual moralizing by homophobes, adulterers, whoremongers and probably a few pedophiles over Weiner's cyber sexcapades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
virgogal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-11 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. The lying is the ONLY thing that bothers me,I could care less
about the sex situation and I've posted this before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Nov 28th 2014, 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Congress Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC