Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The return of the Swift Boat.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU
 
globalvillage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 01:38 PM
Original message
The return of the Swift Boat.
Navy wants small, nimble craft in Iraq
Harbors, coastlines, rivers to be patrolled
BY JULIAN E. BARNES
Los Angeles Times
VIRGINIA BEACH, Va. — Swift boats own a small but tortured part of Navy history. The shallow-water craft crewed by armed sailors patrolled the rivers of Vietnam, one of the most dangerous missions in the Navy.

In the 2004 presidential campaign, the boats emerged as part of a bitter debate over whether Navy veteran John Kerry, the skipper of one of the 50-foot vessels, was a slacker or a hero.

Now, 30 years after Swift boats were mothballed, the Navy has decided they are just what's needed in Iraq and beyond.

Next year, the Navy will deploy a squadron of 220 sailors to patrol Iraq's Euphrates River on 39-foot versions of the boats. Starting with a dozen vessels that can carry up to 16 sailors each, their goal will be to stop shipments of weapons, bombs and fighters from Syria to Baghdad.

more

http://www.twincities.com/mld/twincities/news/nation/14990692.htm?source=rss&channel=twincities_nation


First, let me say that it's pretty fucked up when your first sentence states that this was one of the most dangerous missions in the Navy, and in the second sentence question someoneone who was part of the mission. The 'slacker or hero' phrase could easily have been replaced with one that doesn't lend credence to the bastard Swift Boat Liars.
Second, are they painting targets on these things? Cause it seems to me as dangerous as they were in Vietnam, today in Iraq they'd be sitting ducks. I wonder what the Senator thinks about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ginnyinWI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. you're absolutely right
From the looks of it, even the worst "slacker" on a Swift boat would have to, by definition, be a hero.

I think it's an awful idea. Another brainchild of Rummy's perhaps?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well it's not a sign of drawdown
That's for absolute certain. I would consider this opening up a new front, I wonder if Iraq knows about it.

Do you think that sentence might cause a few people to be embarrassed about their own participation in denigrating a war veteran?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
globalvillage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I hope more than a few.
I'm not faulting the writer so much. He should have worded it differently, but basically, the statement that it was a bitter debate in '04 is true. Maybe you're right and the reader will draw the obvious conclusion.
I just can't, for the life of me, imagine how anyone could point to someone who volunteered to serve and took on an incredibly dangerous mission and use the word 'slacker' in the same sentence. It doesn't even make sense.
I'm just a little touchy, I guess, when the Liars are mentioned without being discredited.
Hell, I HATE John McCain, and I wouldn't think to attack his service. Everything after that, maybe, but even he deserves some respect for the time he served.

I'm sure we'll hear more on this soon. This is all I could find so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Totally right - not to mention, even most of the SBVT didn't
say he was a slacker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Island Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. Here's another article on the same subject
http://home.hamptonroads.com/stories/story.cfm?story=102789&ran=88511

This one doesn't mention Kerry, or even Swift Boats per se. This is like deja vu all over again. I'm no military strategist, but I can see this not turning out real well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. If they're till looking for veterans from the last time
There's a group who seemed to like Bush and his war - the SBVT - maybe they enlist en masse. After all, they helped this war continue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Island Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 06:51 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. True enough
and they seem to have a lot of spare time on their hands. Maybe they could show us how it's really done (:sarcasm:) by being the lead boat going up river.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Interestingly enough, one of the crew members in Kerry's boat
DID get a letter from the Navy and was called for service to Iraq because I think he was still in the IRR -- too funny!! I think he didn't go, on account of him being, you know, kind of old.

As the story IB referenced, the disclosure of this new Navy small boat unit was first reported back in April in Virginia Beach -- my town. It was posted in GD, and it ends up there already are boats there patrolling but the Army is doing it. Apparently there is a turf war element to this -- the Navy wants in on the action. The mission in Iraq is not as dangerous as Vietnam because you don't have that jungle cover and also I think the Euphrates River is wider. That's what a Vietnam Vet (who was on the rivers in the really small boats) said. Nevertheless, feel a little bit for my town (and Fedup's), because we may start getting more casualties here which we've escaped so far due to this being mostly a Navy town.

I don't like that sentence in the article about Kerry -- hero or slacker -- WTF?? The only thing important are the facts -- and the facts overwhelmingly support Kerry getting 3 purple hearts, and the silver and bronze medals. Whether he was a "hero" or a "slacker" are not really related to those medals and quite subjective. Those SBVT idiots could have come out and said he was a slacker without also saying that he didn't deserve the medals (explosive charges). THAT'S my objection. The first being an opinion the second being outright lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC