|
Edited on Fri Oct-28-05 09:54 AM by karynnj
I, for one, love your ability to describe a different place and time in a way that, although the press still seem unfair and strange, at least have some explanation.
It also is an important perspective because the national press has seemed to follow the Massachusetts press on some of these perceptions. That was a very likely factor in Kerry's narrow loss (or insufficient win - if you count people he motivated to vote for him.) Part of the problem might be that people elsewhere assume Boston = liberal = bias toward Kerry. They then read the Globe biography and assumed that this was the most positive view possible that anyone could have of Kerry's career (by the reporters who know him best - but not including Oliphant, because he likes him).
Your comments show that the Massachusetts press often was influenced by the RW talking points of Nixon, Reagan, and now Bush that claim Kerry is things that looking just at Kerry's actions, he is not. I think part of the reasons some of these themes continue are that they often were vague and subjective (thus harder to dispel) and Kerry opts to take the high road, hold his head high and continue to do what he thinks right on critical issues rather than get into a fight over character assignations. The official record, whether it be from the navy, the anti-war movement, the FBI, or his public career all show him to be who he says he is - and in a fair world - this would be all that matters.
You also did a great job in explaining Kerry's personality and every Massachusetts person has said some variation of the same thing. Each of you referred to Kerry's formalness and seriousness in public interactions - that show his respect for the Senate seat Massachusetts honors him with and the intense loyalty of the people who are his real friends. This shows a person who has acted with decency and honor throughout his life and could be counted on to continue to do so.
All of you act as character witnesses for Kerry. That all of you have said that there were times when you disagreed with some votes he cast, but that you always trusted that he was acting in good faith is important. In a cynical world where too many votes are sold for contributions or political gain - this trust is impressive and reading between the lines, this is not a compliment most of you Mass people would give without merit as it clearly means a lot to you. For the Presidency (or the Senate), these personal characteristics coupled with intelligence, eloquence and a caring agenda are what counts. (The Butler pictures and other accounts that show he also has an incredible zest for life are cool and make it more fun to read about him, but they are only the icing on the cake.)
For those of us outside the state and not in Ohio or NH, our first look at Kerry on a personal level (not at a debate articulating positions) was his reunion with Rassman - ignoring the whole background that he saved the guy's life, what came through on the video was a very appealing unwillingness to claim credit for what really was an extraordinary selfless act - saying anyone would have done it. There seemed a slightly, almost bashful, shyness that had not come out when he was in "campaign mode" - enthusiasticly pushing programs and eloquently explaining why Bush needed to go.
That all of you have noted that he has allowed people to see more of the private side, rather than just the public side, since the election is also very interesting. His emails are unlike any I've seen from any politician. There are at least 2 aspects of this: they are written very personally and relatively informally and they contain far more information on the topic he is talking about, what the reasons are behind the position he is taking and what the reader can do. The latter signals he has respect for the intelligence of the reader and wants to make the case for supporting specific issues - this is not the typical form letter, which can be summarized as (Democrats do good: laundry list), (Republicans do bad: laundry list), (phony survey with loaded questions that would never merit analysis - which is ok because none is planned), (request for money).
I love the new email demanding Bush lay out a plan on Iraq. If he can lead the Democrats and possibly the non neo-con Republicans to pushing for getting the real issues on the table, he will have focused the choices we have left in Iraq. It is so interesting that he is acting both as a respected Senator and as a leader urging (in his speech) CITIZENSHIP ( I wonder if he is intentionally shifting from the wording of activist to (active) citizen - which is more fundamental, more patriotic and basic).
Thanks again to all you Massachusetts people for giving us the perspective to trust a very very unique person. ( I think Nixon's real view of Kerry was not "young demagogue" but instead he feared him as a potentially charismatic leader with a genuine love for some American and universal values that Nixon and the RW really don't ascribe to.)
|