What is it:
http://www.downingstreetmemo.com/What does it mean:
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/Why a letter? Why write to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence? What happens next?
(TayTay doesn't know the answers to these questions. She prays that she is making an informed guess, but is not sure.)
KerryGoddess posted that hearings would go before the Senate Intelligence Committee. The Rules of that committee state:
http://intelligence.senate.gov/rules%20of%20procedure.h ...
Rule 6. Investigations
No investigation shall be initiated by the Committee unless at least five members of the Committee have specifically requested the Chairman or the Vice Chairman to authorize such an investigation. Authorized investigations may be conducted by members of the Committee and/or designated Committee staff members.
The members of the Committee, from whom five sigs are needed are:
REPUBLICANS
Pat Roberts, Kansas Chairman
Orrin G. Hatch, Utah
Mike Dewine, Ohio
Christopher S. Bond, Missouri
Trent Lott, Mississippi
Olympia J. Snowe, Maine
Chuck Hagel, Nebraska
Saxby Chambliss, Georgia
DEMOCRATS
John D. Rockefeller IV West Virginia, Vice Chairman
Carl Levin, Michigan
Dianne Feinstein, California
Ron Wyden, Oregon
Evan Bayh, Indiana
Barbara A. Mikulski, Maryland
Jon S. Corzine, New Jersey
Why The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence?Because this committee has oversight responsibilities on the US intelligence agencies. They are supposed to monitor the CIA, NSA and other Intel gathering bodies and make sure they are doing their jobs correctly. Obviously, something went wrong in the build-up to the Iraq War. There were no weapons of mass destruction. This is a link to the conclusion of their WMD report:
http://intelligence.senate.gov/conclusions.pdfThe Bush Admin has responded to the fact that there were no WMDs by saying:
-- that everyone in the world thought there were WMDs, so this makes it okay.
-- that the CIA and other Intel agencies were derelict in their duties and mis-informed the Admin. (This is a blatant lie.)
-- that Congress (Esp. the Senate) had the same Intel as the White House and knew what the Bushies knew. The Downing Street Memos strongly suggest that this is also a lie. "The facts were being fixed around the policy" is exactly backwards and a mockery of what a build-up to something as serious as war should entail.
------ need more, people ---------
Why write a letter? Why does Sen. Kerry want to do this?------------ pure conjecture here, not more than that, CORRECT ME AT WILL ----------
Sen. Kerry voted for the IWR purely based on the pushed notion that Iraq posed an
immediate threat to the security of the US. He stressed, over and over, that all alternative means shy of war should and must be tried first. He also wanted to see the return of UN weapons inspectors to Iraq as a direct effort to get Saddam Hussein to show that he wasn't activating his weapons program. Kerry's vote was based on the presence of WMDs in Iraq that were capable of being activated and used against this country and that they posed a threat. The DSM point to the Admin knowing that this case was weak and that the case being pushed to the US Congress (and the UN in Colin Powell's speech) was, at best, weak, at worst an outright lie. So, this goes to the heart of Kerry's vote and the reasons and conscience that drove that vote.
Part II coming... (tomorrow, time constraints)