Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hiring Laws: Do I REALLY have to consider Republicans / Theists as viable candidates?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Atheists and Agnostics Group Donate to DU
 
Ladyhawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 11:35 PM
Original message
Hiring Laws: Do I REALLY have to consider Republicans / Theists as viable candidates?
I'm disabled and I need some serious help. I'll be paying money I really can't afford to a "motivator" or "life coach."

This may sound strange to you, but this particular R2 unit (me) has developed a very bad motivator. My moods are unreliable and they influence what I can and cannot do. I may have a good day and get a lot done. Then I'll have weeks of bad days and whatever progress I made will be lost. (I have a severe form of depression that has never responded well to treatment.)

If part of the job description (being a motivator) requires that the person I pay be 1) intelligent and 2) non-judgmental (i.e. not a Republican), can I discriminate? I can't even imagine a Republican motivating me...except perhaps motivating me to jump off the nearest convenient bridge.

It's probably too much to ask that the person also be a freethinker. I'm guessing the population of atheists in my area is less than 5%.

What's the law in this matter?
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. I suspect, under the circumstances, that you will have the
opportunity to interview potential motivators, correct?

While you're not within your rights to ask them out-right what their political or religious leanings are, there are plenty of ways to get the answers you want.

Ask them if they have trouble working on Sundays - or, more honestly, ask them if they would have problems motivating an atheist. You're not asking them them to share their position, just whether or not they could do their job. If they are hard-core theists, you'll probably be able to tell.

As for politics, again - disclose your leanings. If they have an issue with liberals, you'll see it.

Plenty of people are capable of doing their jobs and leaving their politics and religion at home, so I assume you're only concerned about those that can't or won't do that - and a few questions or comments will give you a good idea.

If part of the job description includes being non-judgmental, you're within your rights to believe that someone who flinches when they hear you say 'atheist' is probably not going to fill the bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ladyhawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah, I'm fine with someone who can do a job
and leave politics and religion out of it; however, if I'm to engage them in conversation (part of the motivation), we'll need a topic besides the weather. :)

And yeah, I already know the reaction I usually get to "I'm an atheist." It's amusing when people who think they know me say, "No you're not." :) Ever had that happen?

The other night, I was at a get-together that probably included most of the liberals in the county. I was showing someone my fossil shark-tooth jewelry and she said, "Don't you feel power when you put that on."

"No, I don't believe in that sort of thing."

"Come on. To make such beautiful art, you must."

Actually, I'm interested in the paleontology. I wonder what creatures met their end due to the teeth. It fills me with wonder that the teeth are millions of years old. But there's no power there. The teeth are rocks shaped by years of fossilization.

What can you do? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Learn how to roll your eyes without it showing . . .
that's what I've had to do. :)

And oh, yes, I've heard "no, you're not" more times than I can count.

At those times, I have learned to silently repeat my personal mantra:

"Remember, it HURTS when you bang your head against the wall. Remember, it hurts . . ."

:banghead:

Good luck with your quest finding a helpful motivator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ladyhawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. What IS it with the "no, you're not"???
Probably, if they had you categorized as a "good person," you cannot, therefore, be an atheist.

Thanks, I have to get ready to look. Just thinking about it is stressful. It's hard to find the motivation to hire someone to motivate me. Think about it for a second and it will make sense. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
onager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. "Ever had that happen?"
All.the.damn.time.

Last December I was back in South Carolina and had an amazing time-travel experience. My cousin/childhood playmate was visiting.

I sneezed and she said "Bless you." I jokingly said, "You don't have to bless me, I'm a non-believer."

"No you're not!"

"Yes I am!"

Suddenly we were both 5 years old again. It just got ridiculous. I don't know how long that went on, but longer than it should have.

Most of the relatives know I'm a non-believer, but we all sidestep the "a" word.

I did sneak in some atheist propaganda on one visit, from an unlikely source: the stupefyingly long Civil War movie Gods & Generals. There's a scene where the famous Bible-thumper "Stonewall" Jackson visits the dying Confederate general Maxey Gregg.

When Jackson says he's praying for him, Gregg growls: "You know I'm not a believer."

Gregg was not only an atheist, but had an astronomical observatory built into his house in South Carolina. He also owned the second-largest scientific library in the United States--bested only by Harvard University.

And Jackson was something of a religious fanatic (and wooish hypochondriac), but at least he was consistent. He wanted his slaves to be able to read the Bible, so he held reading classes for them--which was strictly illegal in Virginia at that time.

Sorry, TMI again...

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Atheists and Agnostics Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC