Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lawmaker pushes for common Navy, CG hull

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 04:02 AM
Original message
Lawmaker pushes for common Navy, CG hull


Freedom was the Navy's first Littoral Combat Ship.


Lawmaker pushes for common Navy, CG hull
By Zachary M. Peterson - Staff writer
Posted : Thursday Dec 13, 2007 18:53:13 EST

The answer to delays and cost overruns in the Navys Littoral Combat Ship program could be solved by the Coast Guard, a key lawmaker told the maritime service chiefs during a hearing Thursday.

Rep. Gene Taylor, D-Miss., told Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Gary Roughead and Coast Guard Commandant Adm. Thad Allen that the two services should look to pursue a common hull for both LCS and the Coast Guards National Security Cutter program.

We cant afford to keep repeating mistakes, Taylor said of acquisition and developmental problems both services have had with key shipbuilding initiatives.

Allen said he plans to meet with Roughead in January to discuss myriad issues, and a common hull could be on the agenda. However, both service chiefs noted their ships use different concepts of operations and that developing a single hull could present requirement challenges. The Navy has already canceled two LCS sea frames this year due to cost. The first 418-foot long national security cutter, the Bertholf, just completed its first set of builders trials and the second ship is scheduled to launch early next year. Eight ships are planned.

The questioning came as lawmakers with the House Armed Services Committee pressed the two admirals along with Marine Commandant Gen. James Conway on why the new maritime strategy does not include a direct force structure outline and a focus on China.


Rest of article at: http://www.navytimes.com/news/2007/12/navy_maritimestra... /



uhc comment: Previous threads on this POS -->

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Eagle_Eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 05:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. "We cant afford to keep repeating mistakes, Taylor said
I say 'We've been there and done that'.

Once upon a time there was a Secretary of Defense named Robert McNamara who directed the Air Force and the Navy to have a common air platform called the TFX. It was designed by a committee, built by the low bid contractor, and has proven itself to be a worthless POS.

How much money would we like to waste this time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Oct 20th 2014, 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC