The Game of Loss and Lack

[katty]

(fwd fr a friend-from halfpasthuman.com site)

The Game of Loss and Lack
>
>In the effort to get to know you all a little better I wish to impart and
>then have comments about a very personal point of view. There are in my
>opinion, trillions of individual points of consciousness in the universes or
>multi dimensions. Those that do not have limitations of time and space held
>as a core consideration can pop in and out of any dimension at will. There
>are only two things that these beings cannot have. LACK & LOSS.
>
>Only while physical and constrained by considerations of duality can you
>suffer or exalt in the conquest of dreams. Only while physical, is there
>anything to overcome or to succumb to. This is Drama, this is Emotion, this
>is Physical Sensation whether pleasure or pain. You can only get it HERE.
>This is why we are so dearly loved by other beings. We are the show. Mostly
>we go about our lives totally involved with the game, handling events and
>circumstances as deftly as we know how. Very similar to a sports star out on
>the field with 100,000 fellow beings in the stands cheering and a million
>more tuned in by TV broadcast. He's just playing the game as best he can.
>
>It is my belief and with some personal experience confirmed at least for
>myself,
>that most of spirit/consciousness is able to tune in to anyone's "personal
>broadcast" of experience. Each of us has a very distinct vibratory frequency
>by which we interact with the universe and along this frequency we co-create
>the whole.
>
>We broadcast this frequency into the universe just like TV or radio. The
>reason that the Nielson Ratings and Television are such a huge success with
>the human race is that it is a direct lower harmonic of what is really going
>on in the universe. There are trillions of spirits out there tuning in to 3D
>land to watch and virtually experience what it is like to be at risk of
>loss. What is it that makes any movie or real life situation exciting? The
>real or perceived chance of loss.
>
>So with 6 billion+ broadcasts or viewpoints from just this planet there is
>to say the least, a wide selection to channel surf through. And you thought
>500 choices on cable were too much? Anyway with that many choices who gets
>watched and who is basically ignored? Some shows make it through a season
>some don't...
>Those broadcasts with the most Risk tend to be watched the most.
>Without judgment of right or wrong, good or evil, the beings watch only for
>content.
>
>Please get this, "There is only Creation from their points of view, all good
>and all supposed bad, are part of the creation and that is it." No judgment
>from them.
>So the broadcasts that draw a bigger audience get better "Sponsorship" by
>that I mean the most collective consciousness that is directed toward your
>life's broadcast the more assistance will come from spirit. With better
>spiritual sponsorship you get better "Production." That is a better quality
>of life and a flow of beneficial circumstances. (This part is my own
>experience) But putting things at Risk, you draw attention from beings that
>cannot personally experience Loss.
>
>LionHeart just did one of these Riskings when he handed some information to
>a person that was supplied exactly for that opportunity. What did LionHeart
>Risk?
>The Admiration from the other being. That is really all there is here to
>gain or loose. The risk was that Lion Heart or the viewpoint of the
>information would be rejected. LionHeart took the risk and the beings tuned
>to his broadcast, Stood and Roared, did the Wave and all that. Every time we
>go ahead and follow our hearts in spite of perceived risk of loss we turn up
>the volume "Up There" and draw more of a crowd and more support.
>
>Hey! It's workin for President Bush! What you thought that this was only for
>the "GOOD GUYS"? I told you, No judgment "Up There" This is how all the "Bad
>Guys" got such a jump on everyone else. They were the ones taking the
>biggest risks weren't they? Like this, Hitler says, "All of you follow me
>and by the way give ME all those countries and the people to do with what I
>want!"
>
>Don't you suppose there was some personal risk at stake here? Wouldn't you
>be a little concerned that someone might get upset at your plans and actions
>and come to beat you senseless? Somehow he jumped past those reservations
>and took the risks.
>
>Remember No judgment. This is exciting stuff and gets lots of attention!
>Bonnie & Clyde, Jessie James, and many other famous thieves and warriors
>have had tremendous successes. Even Rock & Movie Stars have put themselves
>at risk of more loss than most of us. What is it that makes a show go off
>the air after being popular for a while? It becomes predictable or starts
>playing "Over the Top".
>
>Ratings fall even with bigger Risks taken because they are now, predictable.
>With slumping Consciousness ratings the "Sponsorship" dries up and
>"Production" goes to Poop! Bad things happen, (like getting caught and
>stuff) sickness or death moves in and show is over.
>
>So how do you keep the ratings up and growing? By taking ETHICAL risks and
>doing it often.
Ethical risks form no preset pattern, as they are
>spontaneous solutions. Un-ethical actions are "blanket solutions" imposed
>onto spontaneous situations. (Like morals) This is what I have personally
>done and have seen the direct benefits. I have by choice; put myself, and
>what I know that I can demonstrate out in front of thousands of people. I
>have traveled with little but a purpose, to foreign countries to speak to
>and with people that I did not know. I have put personal needs and comforts
>at a lower level of priority so as to allow for such levels of risk. I have
>found that I automatically went into a new level of "Production". Not so
>much in the quality of my life personally (although that too) but more in
>the amount of wonderful openings to bring this information forward. The
>level of acceptance of this information has quadrupled in the past year.
>
>Now here's another trick. Well not so much a trick, but the "Crowd" that
>happens to be tuned into your frequency right now does really love it.
As >you are sitting there reading this with the "God Bumps" running all down
>your body from head to toe, Turn Your Attention To The Crowd and wave your
>acknowledgement of their support and admiration. Then go look for the next
>Ethical risk you can perform.
>
>Have a good game
>In service,
>
>Ian Xel Lungold

[Kind of Blue]

1. Great article, thank you. But it definitely gives

me the creeps, like in the Truman Show sort of way, even down to the bowing to the audience. I do get the gist of the message and appreciate their support though. But still pretty creepy.

[katty]

2. the gist, IMHO of the msg is: the more risk, the more interesting

real and courageous: at least in 3D!

[Kind of Blue]

3. Word!

[ayeshahaqqiqa]

4. I see your point of view

But try looking at it this way: instead of thousands of beings, there is really only One Being in many forms. Perhaps that will seem less creepy.

[Kind of Blue]

6. You are correct, of course.

It was just the initial visual impact of the thought. I mean, I believe the universe is interactive with each of us on a deeply personal level with our progress being part of the overall plan that adds to the whole, so thinking of tons of souls watching me, you, us, as entertainment chomping down on popcorn was a little disturbing and felt a little callous.

I like your advice because it does speak to Oness, it takes away the feeling of "them" who are separate from me. So I give those 3D Watchers a :hi: and a bow ;)

[ayeshahaqqiqa]

5. The message I get from this is

that it is important to remember that this is all a game--a drama--that we are, in reality, far more than our small selves, and that Loss and Lack are illusions.

[katty]

7. yes, we actors on the stage of the great illusion