Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Building a homemade nuclear reactor in NYC

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 12:07 PM
Original message
Building a homemade nuclear reactor in NYC
By Matthew Danzico
BBC News, Brooklyn, New York



Many might be alarmed to learn of a homemade nuclear reactor being built next door. But what if this form of extreme DIY could help solve the world's energy crisis?

By day, Mark Suppes is a web developer for fashion giant Gucci. By night, he cycles to a New York warehouse and tinkers with his own nuclear fusion reactor.

The warehouse is a non-descript building on a tree-lined Brooklyn street, across the road from blocks of apartments, with a grocery store on one corner. But in reality, it is a lab.

In a hired workshop on the third floor, a high-pitched buzz emanates from a corner dotted with metal scraps and ominous-looking machinery, as Mr Suppes fires up his device and searches for the answer to a question that has eluded some of the finest scientific minds on the planet.

more

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/us_and_canada/10385853.stm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. FUSION? He built a fusion reactor?????
That idiot Stephen Davis doesn't know there's a difference between fission and fusion. I have no idea why the MSM was trying to scare me with that "nuclear reactor" talk.

Article doesn't say anything about making it cost effective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Most of histories greatest inventions have come out of someones garage.
A nation without inventors has no future. A nation where all of the inventors are owned by the corporations has no freedom.

Small inventors are an essential part of a free society. I'm glad to see this guy, and others like him, pursuing their ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Number 39
He's actually the thirty-ninth private citizen to successfully build a fusion reactor, not the first.

And as long as corporations refuse to fund research that might lead to unprofitable, though useful, results, this is the only way science IS going to get done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well I should hope someone's working on this.
We only have 5 years left before we need to have these available:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. Inertial Electrostatic Confinement
Originally invented by Philo Farnsworth (the inventor of electronic television). The trick is developing one that generates net positive energy.

Hopes at the time were high that it could be quickly developed into a practical source of fusion power. However, as with other fusion experiments, development into a generator has proven difficult. Nevertheless, the fusor has since become a practical neutron source and is produced commercially for this role. It has been assembled in low-power forms by hobbyists.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 02:29 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. The IEC design was refined by Bussard
and is currently in development by a Navy-funded lab in Santa Fe. Bussard was confident- absolutely convinced- that his calculations showed that the power output and gain would scale with ever-larger devices.

If the scaling laws are shown to be true (and they're on their eighth experimental device, having met all previous scientific goals), we will have a commercially-viable fusion reactor design.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LongTomH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-10 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. There seems to be a whole subculture working on this!
Take a look at Fusor.net, the website for amateur fusion experimenters. I have some skepticism about fusion as a possible energy source; but, I find this absolutely fascinating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC