Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Humans didn't descend from chimpanzees

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
steven johnson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 10:00 PM
Original message
Humans didn't descend from chimpanzees
Edited on Mon Apr-13-09 10:03 PM by steven johnson
The notion that humans descended from a chimpanzee-like ancestor has come into question.



Humanity's immediate predecessors may have had trouble climbing trees, research suggests – so they may not have been as ape-like as many experts believe.

The hominins lived between 1.5 and 4.1 million years ago, a relatively short time after proto-humans and chimpanzees split from a common ancestor (generally thought to have been between four and eight million years ago). Many experts have argued that this ancestor was probably quite chimpanzee-like, and as a result it has been widely assumed that the earliest humans were ape-like, too.

"dorsiflexion" – the degree to which the ankle rotates to point the toes upwards.

To assist dorsiflexion, he found, the bottom of the chimpanzee tibia – the larger of the two bones in the lower leg – is shaped in a certain way where it joins the ankle. But when Dr DeSilva examined 12 fossil tibias from early hominins, he found no such adaptation.

Combined with other skeletal details, the evidence indicated that early human ancestors could not have been good climbers. Writing in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Dr DeSilva says: "Early hominins may have climbed trees like modern humans can and occasionally do today; however, this study suggests that vertical climbing and arboreality were not significant parts of their locomotor repertoire."
He specifies: "Modern chimpanzees safely and effectively climb trees in part because they are capable of extreme dorsiflexion and inversion at the ankle joint. Although early hominins have been hypothesised to be adept tree climbers, none of the 29 known fossil tibiae or tali from 4.12 to 1.53 million years ago possesses the combination of features functionally correlated with vertical climbing in modern chimpanzees. If early hominins were engaging in any substantial amount of arboreal climbing, then they were doing it in a manner ... distinct from modern chimpanzees."


http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/why-our-ancestors-couldnt-ape-chimps-1668260.html







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lurky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. We share a common ancestor with chimps.
Not the same as being descended from chimps. The headline is intentionally provocative. Chimps are still our closest genetic cousins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. It's the same fallacious claim, as always ....
I didn't come from no damned Ape!

Nobody is claiming 'we came from apes (or chimps) .... The principles point to a common ancestor between hominids ...

Hell ... between EVERYTHING that walks the earth ... There is a progression of biological development, and no one of consequence claims men 'came from chimpanzees' ...

It's a classic Strawman ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. No? Really? What a surprise.
Not a lotta trees on a beach. Not a lotta chimps with a diving adaptation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. Finally! We can stop slandering the chimps.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lazer47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. More likely we came from apes,, ie: Bush,,Cheney,, Limbaugh,, Rove
PRIME-APE Examples
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downtown Hound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. I don't care what that article says


Although based on this picture I'm actually willing to admit that maybe chimps evolved from us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lazer47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. You have to evolve up, you can't evolve lower than this thing in the Picture
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Evolution is not a hierarchic process
It is a process of adaptation, not improvement. Sometimes, random mutations appear that are not immediately harmful, as you so eloquently illustrate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
9. How does that change anything?
Ankle shape is probably a fairly simple switch in the hominid compiler. Modify the growth rate a little bit one way and you get a chimp ankle, another way and you get a human ankle.

Chimps evolved from a more human-like ancestor common to us both.

If you falsely insist on some hierarchy of evolution that means chimps are "above" us.

(Well, duh. Humans are walking around on the dirt, and chimps are in the trees closer to God...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. For one thing, it means I need to come up with a new excuse when flinging feces at my coworkers
Edited on Tue Apr-14-09 01:55 PM by Orrex
"My chimp ancestor made me do it" just won't cut it anymore, I'm afraid...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-15-09 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. I'm not a descendant of my first cousin, either.
But we share a pair of grandparents, and all their ancestors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC