Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Supercomputer sets petaflop pace

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 06:55 AM
Original message
Supercomputer sets petaflop pace


Currently, BlueGene/L is the most powerful computer in the world
A supercomputer built with components designed for the Sony PlayStation 3 has set a new computing milestone.

The IBM machine, codenamed Roadrunner, has been shown to run at "petaflop speeds", the equivalent of one thousand trillion calculations per second.

The benchmark means the computer is twice as nimble as the current world's fastest machine, also built by IBM.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7443557.stm

"It will be installed at a US government laboratory later this year where it will monitor the US nuclear stockpile."

Hopefully they'll find someone with half a brain to make sure none go walkies again.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. "It will be installed at a US government laboratory-where it will monitor the US nuclear stockpile"
Edited on Mon Jun-09-08 07:03 AM by hobbit709
Yeah, right. You don't need a supercomputer for that-any decent computer with inventory control software can keep track of that. I'm willing to bet that's the cover story. Now, monitoring phone calls, modeling nuclear reactions and things like that take a supercomputer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. It will also be used for research into astronomy, genomics and climate change.
It will be installed at a US government laboratory later this year where it will monitor the US nuclear stockpile.

It will also be used for research into astronomy, genomics and climate change.

"We are getting closer to simulating the real world," Bijan Davari, vice president of next generation computing systems at IBM, told BBC News.

It would be of particular use for calculating risk in financial markets, he said.


I have to admit, I'm impressed. I had no idea they could get that kind of throughput on floating-point operations.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Random_Australian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Actually, it's not a cover story.
They actually listed the purpose as modelling nuclear reactions.

It's just not stated as such in the media report in the OP.

But yeah, now that they can't perform real nulcear tests, they do modelling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Heard about this last night whilst listening to the BBC
Edited on Mon Jun-09-08 01:52 PM by pokerfan
only they used a "million billion" instead of a
thousand trillion." I fell asleep wondering whether they were using the British version of 'billion' (1012) or the American version (109). The Brits used 'milliard' to describe 109 or at least they used to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Random_Australian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. 'American' version, 10 to the 9.
9+6 =15.

peta = 10 to the 15
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 03:51 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Thank you
I managed to gather that from the article. :)

Interesting. Tonight the ST:TNG episode, 'The Measure of a Man' aired on cable. It gave Data's processing speed as sixty trillion operations per second.

Probably sounded like a lot in 1989.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 04:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. The British versions aren't much used any more
Can't remember the last time I heard "milliard" used, and "billion" in common use pretty much always means 109 in the UK these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. That's what I thought
but I tend to read a lot and I tend to see it (old British billion) at times. Milliard seems to have been replaced with thousand-million even earlier. I wish everyone would simply use the SI prefixes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC