Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

HIV 'could destroy cancer cells'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 10:21 AM
Original message
HIV 'could destroy cancer cells'
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4257783.stm

HIV 'could destroy cancer cells'

US scientists hope to be able to use a harmless form of the Aids virus to seek and destroy cancer cells.

A University of California team found an "impotent" version of HIV, with the disease-causing parts of it removed, tracked down cancer cells in mice.

The next step would be to insert a gene into the virus that would kill the cancer upon contact.

The team told Nature Medicine more safety studies were needed before such a method could be tested in humans.

MORE....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. There is so much that could come out of this.
If you have a type of cell you want to get rid of (cancer), why not use nature's perfectly evolved machine - the virus - for targeting specific cells?

Gotta use extreme caution, though. A mutant strain could develop into a new horrific disease.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dying Eagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. Sounds like good research
So how long will it take for the Feds to cut off funding for this. I mean a cure for cancer, think of how much money the heathcare industry would lose a year if that happened.

P.S I am on a heathcare rant this mourning
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=104&topic_id=3108407&mesg_id=3108407
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. The exquisite specificity...
...of the immune system, and its enemies, when turned to medical use will, I think, do a lot of what nano-tech is supposed to do, but sooner, and with a smaller grey-goo factor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ready4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Grey Goo factor?
Not familiar with the term. Could you explain please? Thanks in advance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomUser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. explanation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Branjor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
5. I guess it doesn't work against Kapocsi's sarcoma n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. On 1 hand, good research, on other hand better be careful
I am all for funding cancer research. And HIV research.

More studies are needed about how cells change to revert to their more fetal form, the rapidly out of control replicating cancer form, and how to be able to deal with them. I am in no way saying I approve of cancer, or meaning to be flip about it, but the process of cancer is very very interesting. This looks like a good bit of science and hope they get funding to continue.

Now for the other side-what do they think they're doing? If humans don't make the world unsurvivable for humans, I think viruses will win out. Messing around with viruses scares me as I don't think humans have the technology or the society to deal with what they're doing.

So, this will be interesting to watch. Thanks for posting this topic. Did you put it in the LBN place also (though the kneejerk reactions may be, um, kneejerky)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC