Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fossil of "Sphinx" discovered in NE China (transitional mammal)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 04:35 PM
Original message
Fossil of "Sphinx" discovered in NE China (transitional mammal)
Edited on Tue Jan-24-06 04:41 PM by TechBear_Seattle
Fossil of "Sphinx" discovered in NE China

The legendary "Sphinx" eventually found its counterpart version in archeological fossil. Chinese and American paleontologists found two distinct kinds of bone characteristics in the fossil of a sharp-mouthed mammal excavated in China's Liaoning province. The mammal's upper part makes people believe it was viviparous while its lower part looks like oviparous, reports Wen Hui Daily.

The latest issue of the British magazine Nature reports the unprecedented discovery. The magazine editor as well as paleontologists marveled at the discovery and believed it might change the traditional theory on mammals evolution.

Li Gang, one of the coauthors of the paper, said the existing mammals are classified into two groups - the viviparous therian which have fully evolved bones such as kangaroos and elephants, and the oviparous monotreme which have comparatively primitive bones. The newly discovered fossil possesses the characteristics of both bones, a fact which won it the title "world No.1".


The article continues at http://english.people.com.cn/200601/23/eng20060123_237626.html

I have to wonder what creationists will make of this one :shrug:


Added "oviparous monotreme"... The platypus? That is the only oviparous (egg-laying) mammal I know of; are there any others?

More added Answered my own question with a look to the Wikipedia article on monotremes. I don't think I've ever heard of an echidna, before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. God put those bones there to test your faith n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nomo Donating Member (84 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. I have to wonder what creationists will make of this one
Wel duh... "God moves in mysterious ways." Oh, and of course it's not a 120 million years old, more like 3000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm amazed at the naivete of the 'it's not in the fossil record' agrument.
For years I've been hearing that "Because these transitional creatures that would prove evolution aren't in the 'fossil record'... so evolution's just a theory."

:puke:

It never occurs to these dolts that we have maybe unearthed one-one millionth of the 'fossil record' with a great deal more to go... if even that.

When the entirety of the Earth's surface, including what is below the oceans, is excavated, then we will have a 'full fossil record'.

Meanwhile it's nice to have something else to shove down their throats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Better yet...
Something entirely new and heretofor undiscovered to shove down their throats. :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. "If it's such an important fossil, why haven't more of them been
discovered? HMMMM?"

You'll never win the argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Actually. ALL creatures that
haven't become extinct are transitional. When a crreationist asks me 'Where are the tranistionals?' , I tell him to look in the mirror.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. There are two species of echidna as well as the platypus
http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/mammal/monotreme.html

They are called spiny anteaters, and they do look like a cross between a hedgehog and an anteater.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilber_Stool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. How the hell did I miss your post?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilber_Stool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. The Echidna (sp)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. Interesting.
Thanks. I've learned a lot and am still learning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. Fossil of "Sphinx" discovered in NE China




The legendary "Sphinx" eventually found its counterpart version in archeological fossil. Chinese and American paleontologists found two distinct kinds of bone characteristics in the fossil of a sharp-mouthed mammal excavated in China's Liaoning province. The mammal's upper part makes people believe it was viviparous while its lower part looks like oviparous, reports Wen Hui Daily.

The latest issue of the British magazine Nature reports the unprecedented discovery. The magazine editor as well as paleontologists marveled at the discovery and believed it might change the traditional theory on mammals evolution.

Li Gang, one of the coauthors of the paper, said the existing mammals are classified into two groups - the viviparous therian which have fully evolved bones such as kangaroos and elephants, and the oviparous monotreme which have comparatively primitive bones. The newly discovered fossil possesses the characteristics of both bones, a fact which won it the title "world No.1".

Analysis of the fossil revealed that the mammal was 12 centimeters long and weighed about 15 to 20 grams. It lived about 120 million years ago in early Cretaceous period.

http://english.people.com.cn/200601/23/eng20060123_237626.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC