Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jury acquits in marijuana case.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Justice Donate to DU
 
Courtesy Flush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 08:34 AM
Original message
Jury acquits in marijuana case.
http://www.theconservativevoice.com/article/24518.html

An interesting article about a guy who convinced a jury to acquit a man for marijuana possession. The jury had been instructed to judge the facts only, and told that they were not allowed to judge the law. It goes on to explain that juries ARE allowed to judge the law, and that's how laws get changed.

MAJOR DISCLAIMER!!! This seems to be a work of fiction, but it may also have an element of truth about jury rights, and the way judges deny jurors their rights. Also, the article is on a conservative website. Don't ask me how it got there. I found it on digg.

:wtf:

Can any law buffs here tell us if judges really do deny these kinds of jury rights? I know they instruct juries what they have to base their decisions on, but can they lie about it? Seems like an acquittal has to stick, once it's handed down by the jury.

Apologies if this has been posted already. I don't visit this forum often.
Refresh | +2 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
mainegreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Jury nullification is legal, but usually can't be mentioned.
That's why it's good to know your rights as a juror should you be called to serve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Mind_your_head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Can you explain more please
Coincidentally I am to report for jury duty tomorrow (I guess that's why this thread caught my eye). I've never been called for jury duty before and am a bit apprehensive about what to expect. I also think it's weird to report on a Wednesday, but people I talked with said that that wasn't so odd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
mainegreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Basically juries can aquit, and juries do not need to explain why. Its a de facto power.
The constitution states quite clearly that juries decide trials. It does not state how they do that, so constitutionally juries get to decide that for themselves. It's on of the greatest powers the people have, and the system does not want you to know about it.

Here's the wiki article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_nullification

Note how it applies to modern America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Mind_your_head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Thank you for the info/link
I was just looking it up for myself. Very interesting - I didn't know this before. Thanks again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. If it's an unjust law being applied, keep your mouth SHUT about this! Act dumb!
Or they'll press the "eject" button on your seat! They DON'T want informed jururs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
3. Sadly, it looks too much like fiction. The characters talk in big paragraphs. But then again
Edited on Tue Apr-24-07 09:11 AM by Commie Pinko Dirtbag
similar things may have happened elsewhere, because the facts on the law are exactly those. Jury nullification is real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Courtesy Flush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. As I said. It's most likely fiction
But that's not the point. The point is that we don't have to believe what we're being spoon fed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Justice Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC