Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

20 highest radiation cell phones

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
 
salvorhardin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 04:18 PM
Original message
20 highest radiation cell phones
Edited on Wed Mar-17-10 04:32 PM by salvorhardin
This is a hot topic around here, but CNET has published the twenty phones with the highest SAR levels. First, some context and editorializing though.

SAR stands for Specific Absorption Rate - the rate at which a body absorbs energy from an electromagnetic field oscillating at radio frequencies (RF). It's a measure of power absorbed per mass and is usually given in Watts per kilogram. In the U.S. the FCC requires phones to not exceed 1.6 W/kg.

When we're talking about RF energy, radiation is a loaded term since RF energy isn't ionizing radiation (it doesn't strip electrons out of their orbits) thus it can't cause genetic damage and/or cancer. Also, the strength of RF energy is subject to an inverse-square power law. That means the strength of the signal is inversely related to the square of the distance to the signal. Move the phone only 2 inches from your head and you're absorbing just a quarter of the RF energy as if it was only 1" from your head.

But even if the phone is held right upside your head, then only your scalp is getting the full SAR dose of the phone. Your bone, and body's fluids, will greatly reduce the power of the RF reaching your tissues and brain. Because it's not ionizing radiation, the only thing it can do is slightly heat up your body's tissues. Since the power levels are so low, and are further attenuated by distance from the phone to the affected tissues as well as by bone mass and body fluids, there's no conceivable mechanism by which cell phones could be harming you. That doesn't prove there's no harm, but without a verifiable mechanism it makes it extremely unlikely.

Finally the research, while sometimes contradictory, is voluminous and there is no scientific consensus that RF exposure from even long term cell phone use is any cause for concern.

Now, with all that being said, if you want to err on the side of caution (and I see nothing wrong with that), here are the top 20 highest radiation cell phones:

1 Motorola V195s 1.6
2 Motorola Zine ZN5 1.59
2a Motorola Rival 1.59
4 Kyocera Jax S1300 1.55
4a Motorola VU204 1.55
6 RIM BlackBerry Curve 8330 (Sprint) 1.54
6a RIM BlackBerry Curve 8330 (U.S. Cellular) 1.54
6b RIM BlackBerry Curve 8330 (Verizon Wireless) 1.54
9 Motorola Crush 1.53
9a Nokia E71x 1.53
11 Pantech Matrix 1.52
12 LG Rumor 2 1.51
12a RIM BlackBerry Bold 1.51
14 HTC SMT5800 1.49
14a Motorola Droid 1.49
16 Sony Ericsson W350a 1.48
17 LG Chocolate Touch 1.47
17a Nokia 2320 GoPhone 1.47
17b Palm Pixi Plus (Verizon Wireless) 1.47
17c T-Mobile Dash 3G 1.47
http://reviews.cnet.com/2719-6602_7-291-2.html?tag=page;page


You can find the phones with the lowest SAR values here: http://reviews.cnet.com/2719-6602_7-291-3.html
If you like pictures, there is a slideshow of the phones with the highest SAR values here: http://reviews.cnet.com/2300-6454_7-10002813.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlueJazz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. I use one of those "High Radiation" phones and have not noticed any problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salvorhardin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Zombieism not a recognized outcome of frequent high radiation cell phone use.
I'm pretty sure I read that on the side of my mobile's packaging when I bought it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJazz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Zombieism ???...Well, that explains it. I was wondering why my Friends ....
...are starting to look...ah..."Tasty"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. i wonder why the pixi plus would be on the list and not the pixi..
AFAIK, the plus just allows for the device to work as a wireless AP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. The antenna design often varies even among "similar" models.
That affects the SAR rating.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. thanks..
nice to see that my palm pre wasn't on the list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hey! Just cause I've had an overwhelming desire to smack flies and eat them
when I see them, ever since my mother gave me a Sony Ericsson emergency phone is no reason to call it some kind of genetic damage or health concern or something. *twitch*


:P

:evilgrin:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salvorhardin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. That has nothing to do with the phone
Edited on Thu Mar-18-10 12:06 AM by salvorhardin
That is a normal random genetic mutation. You are an Human Mutant. Unfortunately, you are also easily misled and will serve Max Eisenhardt's nefarious plans for world domination.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 03:29 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Noooooooo, not Magneto!
:yoiks:

:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC