Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Doctors Ignore Proven Alternative to Coronary Stents and Bypass Surgery

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 11:49 AM
Original message
Doctors Ignore Proven Alternative to Coronary Stents and Bypass Surgery
http://search.lef.org/cgi-src-bin/MsmGo.exe?grab_id=0&page_id=471&query=eecp&hiword=EECPS%20eecp%20

A unique opportunity to save countless lives and billions of dollars is being overlooked by the medical community. This technique increases blood flow to the heart, strengthens the circulation, and offers a proven way to treat heart disease in lieu of stents or bypass surgery.

Enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) is a safe, non-invasive procedure that can overcome heart disease in two ways—by passively exercising the heart to strengthen the vascular system and by targeting inflammation, the underlying culprit in damaged blood vessels that inhibits blood flow.


More than 100 studies have demonstrated its overwhelming effectiveness and unquestioned safety in improving blood flow in patients with heart disease. Some experts are calling for the EECP procedure to become first-line therapy for heart disease, long before surgery or other invasive procedures are used. Approved by the FDA for chronic stable angina, cardiogenic shock, congestive heart failure, as well as during a heart attack, EECP not only saves lives but is also considerably cheaper and safer than traditional invasive procedures such as angioplasty and coronary stents, which continue to be the mainstay of therapy. Medicare even pays for it!

By improving circulation, this simple procedure prevents arteries from becoming blocked, allowing the heart to do its job more effectively. As is often the case, health care in the United States is often driven by lucrative revenues making many in the medical community reluctant to embrace alternative therapies.


...........snip................

For patients with some forms of heart disease, enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) is a non-invasive, high-tech, low-risk procedure, performed on an outpatient basis, which offers a remarkable reprieve from some of the potentially disabling symptoms of stable angina and coronary heart disease. Patients lucky enough to be offered this underused therapy may experience changes in their conditions that range from significant pain relief to renewed mobility and energy, to a rekindled libido. They may also literally gain a new lease on life, simultaneously avoiding the dangers of coronary bypass surgery while buying enough time to reverse the heart disease that brought them to this crossroads in the first place. But chances are, unless you inquire about it, you’ll never even be told this option exists.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. What a ridiculous headline. Doctor-hatred is getting out of control.
And you should be ashamed for helping to propagate it. Their bashing begins with the words, "Imagine this scenario." In other words, let's paint a fictional picture and bash mainstream doctors using it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Huh?
This is pretty accurate, as far as I can tell. This is an FDA approved procedure, but many patients are not being told about it.

It could be that the doctors don't know about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. In which case they wouldn't really be "ignoring" it, now would they?
Sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. well, I haven't done a survey
A doctor has to buy the equipment to be able to use this. This is just a guess, but I am "guessing" that doctors that don't have the equipment are unlikely to recommend it.

The point is that people need to be apprised of all options. This may or may not be the best treatment for a particular patient. However, if they are not told about it, the patient cannot consider that option.

I think it is rather appropriate for this to be posted in the Health Forum, and I *always* use the title of the article in my subject, whether it offends anyone or not.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. So based on a guess, you're willing to post a claim that doctors "ignore" a treatment
rather than being unaware of it, or perhaps even deciding that it wouldn't be appropriate in a given circumstance?

Your article was devoid of facts too - just engaging in reckless, unsupported doctor bashing.

Shameful and disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. you need help n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbgrunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. well, my doctors never mentioned it when I had 3 stents put in last year.
...and I asked about alternatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crikkett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. itsjustme SAID that the TITLE OF THE ARTICLE was posted, not their opinion.
so stop beating them up. You've made your point.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Thanks for your opinion.
I'm off to "get help" now. :eyes:

I'll just turn a blind eye to doctor-bashing next time, so as not to "beat someone up."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crikkett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. Dude you went overboard and stopped reading, that's all. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Perhaps you could point out exactly where itsjustme said...
Edited on Mon Jul-28-08 05:54 PM by trotsky
that she doesn't agree with the title?

And then you can maybe go on to explain how people who have devoted many years of their lives to healing people deserve such shoddy initial reporting and re-publishing on this forum.

Again, thanks for your opinion that I went overboard. I'm proud to go "overboard" to defend those who heal. You can defend this rotten publication if you want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Usrename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. I guess they would be ignorant of it.
They're just plain ignorant, they aren't ignoring anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. Perhaps they don't know about it.
My ex, a physician, had a stent. Did not know about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. This has been the first
line of treatment in China for a long time.
It is actually an FDA approved treatment in the US as well.
To the body this treatment is a simulation of exercise and gives the body almost the same benefits -
anti-inflammatory effects (chemicals released from the interior of the vessels) and increased circulation by keeping the smaller blood vessels alive.
People can google EECP and find clinics offering this treatment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. you know those silly looking things they sold on TV?
Edited on Mon Jul-28-08 12:30 PM by itsjustme
Where it supposedly pumps the lymph fluid up the leg, to get rid of edema, supposedly? This is like a very high tech, FDA approved version of that (and undoubtedly more effective). I think you have to go to the doctor's office for an hour or so for thirty days or so and get hooked up to it.

Then, new blood vessels grow around the old blocked ones, or something like that.

It probably should be used a lot more here, but people don't know about it.

Thanks for the information about China.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Yes
the contractions of the cuffs are synchronized to the heart's activity. Now they are operated with computers.

A variation of this is used on some people after surgery to avoid clots.

I bet a lot of people would do better trying this than taking some of those mind-numbing drugs.

;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. And not just drugs!!
We are talking about an alternative to open heart surgery in many instances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
15. Good information. Thanks for posting it. - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
16. Very interesting.
There's a very strong history of coronary artery disease and peripheral vascular disease on both sides of my family, so this definitely warrants further investigation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
18. EECP procedure used for first time to treat diabetic patient
http://www.khaleejtimes.com/DisplayArticleNew.asp?col=§ion=subcontinent&xfile=data/subcontinent/2008/July/subcontinent_July156.xml

A doctor in Kerala has successfully tried a non-surgical procedure called enhanced external counter pulsation (EECP) for treating a diabetic patient with liver and renal failure.

.........sbuo..........................

"Thomas had a serum Creatinine level of 7.5 mg/deci litre (normal 1.5mg/dl), gross swelling of feet and face, Serum Potassium level of 5.9 mg/dl (normal: 5.5 mg/dl) and markedly decreased urine output. His doctors had advised him renal transplant and Hemodialysis as his only options forward and was referred to India for placement of Atreriovenous Fistula," Dr Ajith said.

He said he had chosen the EECP treatment for Thomas on a first time trial on the basis of an earlier published study from Germany which had noticed improvement of renal function in patients with both liver and renal failure awaiting transplantation.

"After 35 days of one hour a day EECP therapy, Thomas remarkably improved both clinically and biochemical parameters. Post EECP therapy he lost about 6kg weight, his swelling had disappeared, urine output had doubled at half the dose of diuretic medication, his blood pressure had normalised at half his medication strength," said Dr Ajith.

He said EECP is an effective procedure to augment renal excretory function in healthy volunteers as well as in patients with diabetic renal failure. In such patients, GFR (glomerular Filteration rate) and renal plasma flow increased during EECP.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
19. The problem with the folks at Life Extension is that they take
an extremely limited study at a university and ASSUME every doctor has access both to the study and to the equipment and that the whole business has gotten FDA approval from corrupt appointees who have every reason to drag their feet.

The original study is here: http://cardiology.ucsf.edu/clinical/eecp/#stony_brook

I would suggest the people at Life Extension provide this information without the polemics in the future. They're making themselves look stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. this is not a new treatment AT ALL
From the linked page--

"Discussed during the "Cardiology Update, 1997" October 16-18, 1997
at the Carmel Valley Ranch Resort, Carmel, CA
Directed by William W. Parmley, MD, FACC
and Kanu Chatterjee, MBBS, FRCP, FACC"

The fact that this study was in 1997 and still patients don't seem to know about it seems to prove their point.

Overall, more than one hundred studies have been done.

Doctors should keep up with their fields. Ignorance is not an excuse- at least not for cardiologists. This is not a cure all, but for many people it is a way better mousetrap that has been invented, and has been available for several years. Some clinics do have it. I certainly would seek those clinics to get any serious heart problems checked out. Even with those clinics, the operations are likely to be more profitable (not saying that is a consideration, but the patient needs to know that).

Here are just the studies in the last two years: If my cardiologist was not aware of these, then I certainly would not trust him/her.

And if the cardiologist does not have the equipment, and the patient is a good candidate for this, the patient should be apprised of the treatment, with the option of going to another group.

1:
Kronhaus KD, Lawson WE.

Enhanced external counterpulsation is an effective treatment for Syndrome X.
Int J Cardiol. 2008 Jun 28.
PMID: 18590931
2:
Esmaeilzadeh M, Khaledifar A, Maleki M, Sadeghpour A, Samiei N, Moladoust H, Noohi F, Haghighi ZO, Mohebbi A.

Evaluation of left ventricular systolic and diastolic regional function after enhanced external counter pulsation therapy using strain rate imaging.
Eur J Echocardiogr. 2008 Jun 21.
PMID: 18579500
3:

Loh PH, Cleland JG, Louis AA, Kennard ED, Cook JF, Caplin JL, Barsness GW, Lawson WE, Soran OZ, Michaels AD.

Enhanced external counterpulsation in the treatment of chronic refractory angina: a long-term follow-up outcome from the International Enhanced External Counterpulsation Patient Registry.
Clin Cardiol. 2008 Apr;31(4):159-64.
PMID: 18404725
4:

Xie S, Yu D, Wei X, Wang K.

The semantic extension and storage of EECP Hemodynamic Waveforms based on DICOM Standard.
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2008 Apr;46(4):391-7. Epub 2008 Feb 12.
PMID: 18266019
5:
Casey DP, Conti CR, Nichols WW, Choi CY, Khuddus MA, Braith RW.

Effect of enhanced external counterpulsation on inflammatory cytokines and adhesion molecules in patients with angina pectoris and angiographic coronary artery disease.
Am J Cardiol. 2008 Feb 1;101(3):300-2. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
PMID: 18237588
6:
Kent TL, Glybina IV, Abrams GW, Iezzi R.

Chronic intravitreous infusion of ciliary neurotrophic factor modulates electrical retinal stimulation thresholds in the RCS rat.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Jan;49(1):372-9.
PMID: 18172115
7:
Arora RR, Bergmann S.

Effects of enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) on myocardial perfusion.
Am J Ther. 2007 Nov-Dec;14(6):519-23.
PMID: 18090877
8:
Bondke A, Buschmann IR, Bode C, Buschmann EE.


Hamostaseologie. 2007 Dec;27(5):363-72. German.
PMID: 18060248
9:
Estahbanaty G, Samiei N, Maleki M, Noohi F, Mohebi A, Ojaghi Z, Esmaeilzadeh M, Sadeghpour A, Soran O.

Echocardiographic characteristics including tissue Doppler imaging after enhanced external counterpulsation therapy.
Am Heart Hosp J. 2007 Fall;5(4):241-6.
PMID: 17982308
10:
Manchanda A, Soran O.

Enhanced external counterpulsation and future directions: step beyond medical management for patients with angina and heart failure.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Oct 16;50(16):1523-31. Epub 2007 Oct 1. Review. Erratum in: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Dec 18;50(25):2441.
PMID: 17936150
11:
Sajja V, Dod H, Beto R, Jain AC, Hobbs GR, Finkel MS.

An analysis of the efficacy and safety of enhanced external counterpulsation at West Virginia University Hospitals.
W V Med J. 2007 May-Jun;103(3):10-2.
PMID: 17849668
12:

McCullough PA, Henry TD, Kennard ED, Kelsey SF, Michaels AD; IEPR Investigators.

Residual high-grade angina after enhanced external counterpulsation therapy.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2007 Jul-Sep;8(3):161-5.
PMID: 17765644
13:

May O.


Ugeskr Laeger. 2007 Jun 25;169(26):2507-12. Review. Danish.
PMID: 17725894
14:
Arora RR, Shah AG.

The role of enhanced external counterpulsation in the treatment of angina and heart failure.
Can J Cardiol. 2007 Aug;23(10):779-81. Review.
PMID: 17703254
15:
El-Sakka AI, Morsy AM, Fagih BI.

Enhanced external counterpulsation in patients with coronary artery disease-associated erectile dysfunction. Part II: impact of disease duration and treatment courses.
J Sex Med. 2007 Sep;4(5):1448-53. Epub 2007 Jul 18.
PMID: 17634052
16:
Zhang Y, He X, Chen X, Ma H, Liu D, Luo J, Du Z, Jin Y, Xiong Y, He J, Fang D, Wang K, Lawson WE, Hui JC, Zheng Z, Wu G.

Enhanced external counterpulsation inhibits intimal hyperplasia by modifying shear stress responsive gene expression in hypercholesterolemic pigs.
Circulation. 2007 Jul 31;116(5):526-34. Epub 2007 Jul 9.
PMID: 17620513
17:

Yavari M, Montazeri HR.

Effects of enhanced external counterpulsation on anginal symptoms and improvements in objective measures of myocardial ischaemia.
Cardiovasc J Afr. 2007 May-Jun;18(3):154-6.
PMID: 17612746
18:
Michaels AD, Bart BA, Pinto T, Lafferty J, Fung G, Kennard ED.

The effects of enhanced external counterpulsation on time- and frequency-domain measures of heart rate variability.
J Electrocardiol. 2007 Nov-Dec;40(6):515-21. Epub 2007 May 29.
PMID: 17532337
19:
Werner D, Michalk F, Hinz B, Werner U, Voigt JU, Daniel WG.

Impact of enhanced external counterpulsation on peripheral circulation.
Angiology. 2007 Apr-May;58(2):185-90.
PMID: 17495267
20:

Lawson WE, Hui JC, Kennard ED, Soran O, McCullough PA, Kelsey SF; for the IEPR Investigators.

Effect of enhanced external counterpulsation on medically refractory angina patients with erectile dysfunction.
Int J Clin Pract. 2007 May;61(5):757-62.
PMID: 17493089
21:
Cohen J, Grossman W, Michaels AD.

Portable enhanced external counterpulsation for acute coronary syndrome and cardiogenic shock: a pilot study.
Clin Cardiol. 2007 May;30(5):223-8.
PMID: 17492675
22:
El-Sakka A, Morsy A, Fagih B.

Enhanced external counterpulsation in patients with coronary artery disease-associated erectile dysfunction. Part I: effects of risk factors.
J Sex Med. 2007 May;4(3):771-9. Epub 2007 Apr 13.
PMID: 17433083
23:


Ask the doctor. Enhanced external counter pulsation (EECP) is getting wider recognition, and some clinics provide this service. Is it a safe medical substitute for stent implantation or heart bypass? Any side effects?
Heart Advis. 2006 Nov;9(11):8. No abstract available.
PMID: 17297738
24:
Soran O, Kennard ED, Bart BA, Kelsey SF; IEPR Investigators.

Impact of external counterpulsation treatment on emergency department visits and hospitalizations in refractory angina patients with left ventricular dysfunction.
Congest Heart Fail. 2007 Jan-Feb;13(1):36-40. Erratum in: Congest Heart Fail. 2007 Mar-Apr;13(2):124.
PMID: 17268208
25:
Abbottsmith CW, Chung ES, Varricchione T, de Lame PA, Silver MA, Francis GS, Feldman AM; Prospective Evaluation of EECP in Congestive Heart Failure Investigators.

Enhanced external counterpulsation improves exercise duration and peak oxygen consumption in older patients with heart failure: a subgroup analysis of the PEECH trial.
Congest Heart Fail. 2006 Nov-Dec;12(6):307-11.
PMID: 17170583
26:
Lawson WE, Barsness G, Michaels AD, Soran O, Kennard ED, Kelsey SF, Hui JC; IEPR Investigators.

Effectiveness of repeat enhanced external counterpulsation for refractory angina in patients failing to complete an initial course of therapy.
Cardiology. 2007;108(3):170-5. Epub 2006 Nov 1.
PMID: 17085938
27:
Michaels AD, McCullough PA, Soran OZ, Lawson WE, Barsness GW, Henry TD, Linnemeier G, Ochoa A, Kelsey SF, Kennard ED.

Primer: practical approach to the selection of patients for and application of EECP.
Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2006 Nov;3(11):623-32. Review.
PMID: 17063167
28:
Levenson J, Simon A, Megnien JL, Chironi G, Gariepy J, Pernollet MG, Craiem D, Iliou MC.

Effects of enhanced external counterpulsation on carotid circulation in patients with coronary artery disease.
Cardiology. 2007;108(2):104-10. Epub 2006 Sep 29.
PMID: 17008798
29:
Nichols WW, Estrada JC, Braith RW, Owens K, Conti CR.

Enhanced external counterpulsation treatment improves arterial wall properties and wave reflection characteristics in patients with refractory angina.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Sep 19;48(6):1208-14. Epub 2006 Aug 28.
PMID: 16979007
30:
Feldman AM, Silver MA, Francis GS, Abbottsmith CW, Fleishman BL, Soran O, de Lame PA, Varricchione T; PEECH Investigators.

Enhanced external counterpulsation improves exercise tolerance in patients with chronic heart failure.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Sep 19;48(6):1198-205. Epub 2006 Aug 28.
PMID: 16979005
31:
Ochoa AB, deJong A, Grayson D, Franklin B, McCullough P.

Effect of enhanced external counterpulsation on resting oxygen uptake in patients having previous coronary revascularization and in healthy volunteers.
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Sep 1;98(5):613-5. Epub 2006 Jun 30.
PMID: 16923446
32:
Levenson J, Pernollet MG, Iliou MC, Devynck MA, Simon A.

Cyclic GMP release by acute enhanced external counterpulsation.
Am J Hypertens. 2006 Aug;19(8):867-72.
PMID: 16876689
33:
Yu W, Pettersson T, Ohlsson O, Bondesson S, Edvinsson L, Johnsson P.


Lakartidningen. 2006 Jun 14-27;103(24-25):1930, 1933-4. Review. Swedish. No abstract available.
PMID: 16838577
34:
Akhtar M, Wu GF, Du ZM, Zheng ZS, Michaels AD.

Effect of external counterpulsation on plasma nitric oxide and endothelin-1 levels.
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Jul 1;98(1):28-30. Epub 2006 May 3.
PMID: 16784915
35:
Pettersson T, Bondesson S, Cojocaru D, Ohlsson O, Wackenfors A, Edvinsson L.

One year follow-up of patients with refractory angina pectoris treated with enhanced external counterpulsation.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2006 Jun 15;6:28.
PMID: 16776842
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Sorry, Warpy.
The general assumption in this forum is that doctors are evil, right down to the last one, and they'd withhold a cure for AIDS if it meant they could get a better tee time at the golf course. They ALL must know EVERYTHING the INSTANT it becomes known SOMEWHERE, and if they don't they're totally incompetent and want to see you die anyway. :sarcasm:

Sad, really, the scorn that's heaped on medical professionals. Oh but just because someone posts a link and a title and an excerpt and many follow-ups defending the article doesn't REALLY mean they agree with it. More :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
22. same old
"As is often the case, health care in the United States is often driven by lucrative revenues making many in the medical community reluctant to embrace alternative therapies."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. "driven by lucrative revenues"
This coming from a website whose banner includes a phone number and shopping cart to order products direct from them. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. And that has to do with EECP exactly HOW? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. It has to do with the bias of the article you posted, of course.
Unless it's A-OK for your preferred sources to make money off of people's pain and sickness, but NO ONE ELSE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. the source makes ZERO money off EECP
You are way off here. You would have a point if they made money off of it, but, in fact, they don't. If you want to bring financial interests into this, yes, EECP is cheaper than surgery. Do the math.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Again, you totally miss the point.
Better luck next time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chicagomd Donating Member (437 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
30. Ignore?
Common.

How about limited clinical application and the fact that to show clinical effect you have to get a patient to drive to a clinic once a day for THIRTY FIVE DAYS might have something to do with it. It is hard enough to get people to take a pill once a day with any regularity

If you don't like that alternative, how about the company that has 80% of the market share for the devices that perform EECP has a stock that is currently trading at $0.07 needs a little boost.

http://www.vasomedical.com/index.php

There are five centers listed when you search my zip code, hardly a suppressed secret, and doubtfully a cure-all given none of them are major research institutions in a town full of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. we have one in my city
Which seems not enough. It happens to be have some of the *best* cardiologists in town, but that may not be typical of other places. They are not formally connected to the medical school here.

This is a way to search for places that have the devices--

http://www.vasomedical.com/patients_treatment.php

There is plenty of research on these devices, but yes, they do seem to get the ho hum from the medical profession, with a resulting poor profits of the company.

But then, I think that was the whole point. The research is being ignored while *most* doctors continue to do the same old, same old.

Patients should be informed about this option. If it is too burdensome to go to the doctor for an hour every day for a month, they can opt for the much more expensive and often more risky surgery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC