USDA to Publicize Salmonella Poultry Plants

[flashl]

Salmonella prone poultry processors will soon have their names publicized. The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) will be publishing the names of poultry and meat plants that have trouble controlling Salmonella to help reduce its prevalence in meat. Effective March 28th, the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) will publish—online—the names and test results for plants where over 10% of samples are contaminated with Salmonella.

The USDA said these changes are the result of a Salmonella-control initiative it launched two years ago after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported Salmonella had become the most prevalent food borne pathogen, accounting for 38.6% of all cases. The initiative concentrates resources at establishments with higher levels of Salmonella and changes the reporting and use of FSIS verification test results. In the “risk-based” sampling program, poultry and meat plants are sorted into three categories according to their Salmonella test results. Best performers—category 1—are sampled by the USDA less often than those in categories 2 and 3. The names and locations of category 2 and 3 plants will be published on an FSIS Web site.

...

Chris Waldrop, spokesman for the Washington DC-based Consumer Federation of America, welcomed the move to name names. “We have talked to FSIS and encouraged them to post this information on the Web,” he said. “It’s good information for consumers to know,” Waldrop said. Nancy Donley, president of Safe Tables Our Priority (STOP), an advocacy group based in Northbrook, Ill., praised the move but had some concerns that the plan will not enable consumers in grocery stores to see if meat came from a plant with a good record or not. “It’s probably not going to be a huge benefit to the consumer. But it’s going to make it more apparent to those of us who are watching who the good actors are and who the bad actors are,” she said.

The FSIS is working on nationwide studies of the prevalence of various food borne pathogens to provide a baseline for future comparisons and trend spotting. A 12-month study of pathogens in broiler chickens is under way and more studies are being planned. Also, the FSIS is cutting back ground beef plant sampling for plants producing less than 1,000 pounds daily. Officials said those plants account for a large share of samples but a very small percentage of the ground beef supply. For efficiency, the agency will sample those plants less often but will run Salmonella tests on samples already collected for Escherichia coli O157 testing.

News Inferno

[ingac70]

1. Good idea. They shoulda done this already. n/t

[RavensChick]

2. This is good!

As a USDA employee I can say that a) I knew nothing about this until now (blame the position I hold and the politics that prevented it from occuring sooner); and b) the only reason this is being done serves a good purpose of informing the public about which plants are not in compliance with regulations, and for the plants to step up and do the right thing. I applaud FSIS for this one! Now if they can only track the stolen meat from those companies in Texas recently I can go back to eating burgers again.

:D

[Fridays Child]

3. The USDA is gonna be in SO much trouble when George gets wind of this.

This is bad for business, and George won't like it. Nope. He won't like it one little bit.

[RavensChick]

5. Perhaps

but I can tell you many employees (in USDA and many other agencies) can't stand him anyway (including repugs, which is becoming no surprise to me). Besides, with George leaving in a few months (which can't happen fast enough), it ain't gonna matter. I only hope Hillary or Barack will tell the agency to expand this effort.

All Americans have the right to see which company that supplies their meat and poultry are doing all they can to ensure the safety of them and not scramble (pardon the pun) for answers when something goes wrong. I say this--if you want to stay in business do right by the customers! If you can't, find another way to make money.

[hvn_nbr_2]

7. Depends on which poultry plants have the best contributors.

If the salmonella plants gave Bushco enough money, USDA is in deep doodoo. If they haven't given enough, they'll get the old shakedown before USDA publishes the info.

[BadgerKid]

4. The FDA generally requires 95% confidence

So the USDA is twice as permissive as the FDA. Does it matter? I dunno. I'm just pointing out the differences between agencies. :shrug:

[RavensChick]

6. That's true

but both agencies have to tell us, the consumer, who's in line and who is not.