Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Alaska Lawmakers Thumb Nose At Court Ordered Gay Benefits

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
Xeric Donating Member (586 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 03:29 PM
Original message
Alaska Lawmakers Thumb Nose At Court Ordered Gay Benefits
(Juneau, Alaska) Alaska Republicans have drawn a line in the sand, refusing to obey a court order mandating health and other benefits for the same-sex domestic partners of state employees and retirees.

Called into a special session this week by Gov. Frank Murkowski to approve a benefits package worked out by the Department of Administration to comply with the order the legislature the House voted instead to tie the governor's hands on the issue.

It passed a bill prohibiting Murkowski's administration from granting any court-ordered health and retirement benefits for same-sex partners of state employees.

The House then passed a second bill that would put the issue to a statewide plebiscite, asking voters if a constitutional amendment barring gay benefits should go on the 2008 ballot.

Alaska already has a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage in the state. An attempt to extend that to include benefits failed earlier in the House.

Following Friday's vote the House adjourned.

Both measures now go to the Senate. It is unclear how the upper house will vote.

If it concurs with the House it is likely the whole issue of benefits would return to the state Supreme Court. But, if the court overturns the bills it would leave it up to voters.

Democrats were outraged by Friday's House vote.

"I think history will look back and say this Legislature tried to stop the march of progress, the march of civil rights, the march of health care," said Minority Leader Ethan Berkowitz, D-Anchorage.

Last year the state Supreme Court ruled the state must establish benefits to same-sex partners of its employees in response to an action filed by the American Civil Liberties Union and nine Alaska couples.

The high court ruled that because same-sex couples are prohibited from marrying in Alaska, denying them rights extended to married couples deprives them of equal protection guaranteed under the Alaska Constitution.
http://www.365gay.com/Newscon06/11/111806alaska.htm



So much for the rule of law when it comes to Republicans and their bigotry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. you have to know the participants to appreciate the depth of stupidity
in this 'body'. 'lawmakers' routinely ignore, etc court orders up here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
williesgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. If they refuse to follow court order, put them in jail & see how long they last - recommended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. and this exemplifies my problem with leaving
marriage equity up to the states.

gay folk are so far from any thing like equity in so much of the country.

and like racial civil rights -- you sometimes have to MAKE folk do the right thing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC