ok -- could this be more offensive?

[xchrom]

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x5633734

[soothsayer]

1. well, why exactly? because it suggests it's bad/stupid/humiliating

to be gay? I think it's more the case of using ignorant beliefs against the people who hold them (i.e., republicans hate gays, thus one of the best ways to insult/tease/hurt/anger them is suggest they are gay).

But...should I be offended (as a nice lesbian gal)? Mebbe I'm missing something. I'm happy to take offense, so do say why I ought to!

[xchrom]

3. (i.e., republicans hate gays,

thus one of the best ways to insult/tease/hurt/anger them is suggest they are gay).


does that statement really resonate with you?

[DRoseDARs]

4. I've largely gotten over trying to get those around me to stop throwing...

...the word "gay" around so fivolously.

[xchrom]

6. all righty then.

what more can you say?

[DRoseDARs]

2. Probably, but more likely you're being too sensitive...

Does the porn title "Oklahomo" work you up into such a tizzy? ;)

Just relex and let the breeders have their musings.

[xchrom]

5. i prefer not to

uphold their biased/bigoted thoughts about gay folk -- especially in this case.

why uphold the notion that conservatives are gay -- because gay is bad?

that's all it does -- it simply goes around the corner to -- instead of head on to promulgate hate speech and bigoted stereotypes.

i'm sure some porn house will make bareback mountain -- and that's hardly my point.

[closeupready]

7. Thread deleted - what did it say?

or the gist of it?