because of your lack of knowledge of how students in districts other than yours qualify for both gifted and L.D. services. Awareness of the needs of gifted/L.D. students has increased since you started working in the field twenty years ago. Unfortunately, many of these students manage to just get by in primary and secondary school, and aren't identified as L.D. until college (or worse, don't go to college even though they might thrive there.) You can find a great deal of information about this just by googling. Here's just one example:
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0KOC/is_1_5/ai_80306022/pg_2"Gifted students with learning disabilities can be grouped into three categories: (a) identified gifted students with subtle learning disabilities; (b) unidentified students who struggle to maintain average achievement; and (c) identified students with learning disabilities who are later discovered to be gifted (Baum, 1990). Conservative estimates indicate that between 2% and 10% of all children enrolled in gifted programs have learning disabilities (Dix & Schafer, 1996). The students who maintain average achievement often go unnoticed and are the ones who discover later in life, usually in college, that they have learning disabilities (Baum, 1990). Approximately 41% of gifted students with learning disabilities are not diagnosed until college (Ferri, Gregg, & Heggoy, 1997).
"Additionally, difficulties identifying gifted students with learning disabilities are compounded in the primary grades because students are often able to compensate for their disability (Norton, 1996). Elementary age students may demonstrate higher-order thinking skills and contribute to class discussions but fail to submit written assignments (Tallent-Runnels & Sigler, 1995). They may be performing at acceptable levels initially; however, they may begin to falter in the secondary grades as the task demands increase, and they are no longer able to compensate for their disability with their giftedness (Tallent-Runnels & Sigler, 1995).
"The effects of misdiagnosis for these students can be quite severe. An unidentified or misdiagnosed student will not be able to benefit from much-needed special instruction. Furthermore, students who qualify for one program should not necessarily be excluded from the other (Brody & Mills, 1997). For example, a student could score a full scale IQ of 130 or higher on the WISC III, but have achievement test scores that differ by more than 1.5 standard deviations. This student may qualify for a gifted program but may also need special educational programming for the learning disability. Special instruction in both areas of giftedness and learning disability must be provided. Without appropriate diagnosis and placement, the discrepancy between achievement and intelligence may not be reduced and may result in low self-esteem, boredom, anxiety, disruptive behavior, and poor social acceptance for these students (Norton, 1996).
"Even when properly identified and diagnosed, some state policies do not permit school districts to be reimbursed twice for one student, and many of these students fail to qualify for multiple services (Brody & Mills, 1997; Fox, Brody, & Tobin, 1983). Furthermore, few school districts have dedicated programs for this under-served population, and those that are successful provide intensive and consistent interventions over extended periods (Gallagher, 1997; Johnson, Karnes, & Carr, 1997)."
SNIP
____________________________________________
EDITED TO ADD:
There appears to be increasing awareness of this issue even in Michigan. A Michigan organization for learning disabled children links to several articles on this topic, including the one below from the NEA.
http://www.ldaofmichigan.org/education.htmhttp://www.nea.org/newsreleases/2006/nr061101.htmlNovember 1, 2006
New Guide Helps Gifted Students with Special Needs
NEA and NAGC team up to assist educators, school districts and parents
CHARLOTTE—Students with special needs are being denied their basic right to a quality public education. In an effort to combat this trend, the National Education Association and the National Association for Gifted Children released a new guide today to help educators, school districts and parents address the needs of twice-exceptional students.
The term “twice-exceptional” refers to students who are intellectually gifted but have special needs or learning disabilities. . . .
The new publication, The Twice-Exceptional Dilemma, outlines how to identify twice-exceptional students, delineates the roles and responsibilities of school districts and educators, and suggests accommodations and available resources for addressing the needs of these students.
Many special-needs students have been denied specialized services and activities due in large part to a lack of funding. Despite the promises of lawmakers more than 30 years ago to pay 40 percent of the cost of educating students with disabilities, the federal share of funding for the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act is only 18 percent. This translates into a special education funding shortfall of nearly $13.2 billion for this year alone. Without federal resources, states and school districts are forced to cut essential programs.
Experts state that twice-exceptional students are considered gifted, disabled or neither. Since these students are rarely placed in both categories, it creates a situation where they fail to receive the full support and resources needed. This illustrates the importance of awareness, knowledge and proper identification guidelines.
There are six million public school students served under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Twice-exceptional students are estimated to make up nearly six percent of that number.
“Twice-exceptional students are often overlooked because the disability or giftedness can be hidden,” said Nancy Green, NAGC executive director. “This publication provides much-needed guidance to ensure that these students receive the services they need to achieve their full potential.”