Air America Now: Support Heterosexual Marriage Driver's Licenses

[IndyOp]

to protect Troopers from being seduced by gays when Troopers pull gays over.

Apparently gays have 'powers' that they use to seduce young Christian troopers. The guy they are interviewing "Troopers for Normal Groupings" is serious.

OMG! ROFLMAO!

A Trooper could be accidentally 'fellated' ROFLMAO! ROFLMAO!

[The Velveteen Ocelot]

1. Oh, goodness, Officer, I'm really sorry...

I just don't know how that wound up in my mouth. My bad.

ROFL!

[xultar]

2. It could just fall in through the drivers side window. Buhwaaaaaa n/t

[havocmom]

3. Oh, no! Not another 'breathalizer' test for drunk driving

Isn't that a punchline from an old blond joke?

[IndyOp]

4. Janine & Sam kept trying really, really hard not to

burst out laughing and not to attack. They kept asking questions to get him to repeat what he had just said because they couldn't believe what he had just said. At one point he was talking about using 'gay' tricks like talking in a high voice and lifting his eyebrow to mimic gay seductions to see how 'at risk' young troopers really were...

My all-time favorite study about homophobia follows up on Freud's reaction-formation theory (because the culture allows hatred of homosexual feelings, individuals who feel that way have to repress those feelings, and express their feelings of attraction as feelings of repulsion).

In the study (published in a real American Psychological Association journal) heterosexual men were categorized as homophobic or non-homophobic based on their answers to questions on a survey. All men were then fitted with a strain gauge at the base of their penis to measure penile engorgement. All men were shown pictures of naked women and all - homophobic and non-homophobic 'responded' to the pictures.

Now for the interesting bit: they showed all men pictures of naked men. The non-homophobic men showed no response. The homophobic men got 'excited'!

I listened to the AAR interview with the trooper and was just dying to hook this guy up, show him pictures of naked men, and watch the strain gauge burst!

:crazy:

[Jackie97]

11. LOL!

"Now for the interesting bit: they showed all men pictures of naked men. The non-homophobic men showed no response. The homophobic men got 'excited'!"

Okay, on a serious note, I really see no evidence that homophobes are really gay.

Not that I don't like humor, but doesn't this belong on the homosexual rights board or something?

[seaj11]

12. I read that report.

Here's the link: http://www.apa.org/releases/homophob.html

Elle
http://www.nophicent.org

[Maat]

5. I was listening to ... if I didn't know better, I'd think this was a ..

put-on.

ROFLMAO!!!!

Didn't he say he had a 'look' he could use to unseduce them? Or did I get confused from his blatherings? Sounds like they have terms they use to refer to people that are just plain racist.

And, as a social worker, I am really suspicious of the validity of what he is saying about childen being forced to take drugs. I had to push through many a court order about this type of thing, and believe me, the justification had to be convincing and thorough, backed up by hard data and medical opinion.

Now, did medical professional ensure that kids took medicine that would save their life? Oh, yeah.

ON EDIT:
Thanks for clearing that one part up for me. My hubby wants to know if the license plate will save young troopers from getting seduced by young women ... or getting plugged by a .38.

[IndyOp]

6. Childen being forced to take drugs - that is the next guest on the

show not the trooper, right?

About your comment: I have heard several reports about the kids in NY being given 'test' drugs for HIV. A social worker was apparently the whistleblower.

:shrug:

[Maat]

7. Well, I hope they investigate anything that is suspicious.

But that only makes me want to ask more questions. Were they being given the drugs because their doctor believed that was the best medical course of action, or that the drug would save their life.

Let me think. If I was a kid's worker, and his doctor, usually at a local renowed children's hospital, stated that the child needed this drug to stay alive, that there was substantial data that this was true, and that the drug, although still classified as experimental technically, would interrupt the viral replication, I would write a court order request for its administration. And I would get the parents' concurrence with that.

Or are we assuming here that the child was given a drug with no data to support its use - the child being used purely as a test subject. That seems wacky to me. Not saying that it didn't happen. Just never seen a situation like that. The Department would not do that due to the liability. Who can sue? Answer - the biological or adoptive parent - even if their child is in protective custody.

Just some random thoughts.

[IndyOp]

8. I don't know enough...

I do remember that the report I heard on NPR indicated that the kids were wards of the court -- implied that there were no parents in the picture (perhaps the moms had died of AIDS?). Also - the social worker said that the doctor who prescribed the drugs told the social workers that anything they thought were side effects - hair loss, nasty skin lesions - were a result of the HIV, not the test drugs. This sounded particularly sickening to me.

:eyes:

[Maat]

9. Yeah, I was talking about the kids I supervised ..

who were wards of the court, or dependent children. And the thing is that, as a worker, you rely on that child's doctors to make up their treatment plan. The professionals at Loma Linda University Medical Center that I worked with seemed to be of the highest caliber - professionally and ethically. But, yes, if that doctor was insisting that the child needed the drug to stay alive, I would report that to the court, and the judge would likely order its administration. It is not exactly like you could give the kid a choice about taking a drug everyone believed would save his/her life.

I was just trying to give everyone an idea of the thought process.

I welcome the comments. Many times the kids' biological parents have passed. I was careful not to force the administration of drugs that did not have anything to do with saving a life.

This seems like a sticky-wicket, if you will. If you were the worker, would you argue against the drug's administration with no backup? If you were wrong, then the kid would miss out on a life-saving treatment and die. If there was false information given, the drug company should be the one in trouble.

[iverglas]

10. quicker and easier --

Issue driver's licences ONLY to heterosexuals.

That's what they do with marriage licences, isn't it?


(Maybe that's what he was proposing; unfortunately, I missed the hilarity. ;) )