Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Catholics, Anglicans reach accord on Mary

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
 
icymist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 01:04 PM
Original message
Catholics, Anglicans reach accord on Mary
Tuesday, May 17, 2005

Catholics, Anglicans reach accord on Mary
Statement closes big gap between churches

By JOHN IWASAKI
SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER REPORTER

The historical separation between Roman Catholics and Anglicans has narrowed after both found common ground on the position of Mary, mother of Jesus, according to a document conceived at the highest church levels and released in Seattle yesterday.

Anglicans, already close to Catholics because of liturgy and traditions, have moved even closer through their understanding of Mary as outlined in the joint statement, which took five years and an international committee to complete.

The document seeks to transcend past controversies on Catholic dogma, including the Immaculate Conception and the Assumption of Mary. While not spelled out specifically in the Bible, such beliefs can be interpreted through Scripture, according to the 80-paragraph document.

The result might be an elevation, or at least a heightened acknowledgment, of the place of Mary -- particularly for Anglicans, the denomination born in England during the Reformation and called the Episcopal Church in the United States.

(more)
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/224610_mary17.html

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm so relieved
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burma Jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. There's Something About Mary
What's she do with her hair?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sandpiper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thank goodness
Nothing is more upsetting than when different churches can't agree on their pious legends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. Boy! I sure am glad they got *that* resolved.
It's been keepin' me up nights. :sarcasm:

OTOH, it was a mini-revelation that something I was taught in Catholic grammar school in the 1950's was, at the time, very new doctrine. You coulda fooled me -- I thought it was carved in centuries-old stone.

Of course, none of this matters to a collapsed Catholic, one-time atheist, sometime agnostic, ask-me-next-week-what-I-believe-in type like me. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. Why is this in Latest Breaking News?
Seems like this topic is better suited to the Catholic or religious Forums here at DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
icymist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Why is this news in my morning newspaper?
Edited on Tue May-17-05 01:51 PM by icymist
Go ahead and ignore the religious news while this White House makes an office for them within it's walls.

on edit for spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. How the varous religions view Mary is hardly breaking news
Besides, there are forums here where people would be very interested in discussing this topic. Mary's status hardly affects our political life in the U.S. Well - at least not yet. And I would hope - NEVER.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
icymist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Yeah. I get your point here.
However, today this is breaking news. I really wish that religion not be breaking news, but because a neo-con was just voted into the Vatican and because religious news is important to the Right Wing of this country, get used to it. The whole thing, according to my friend, is like a 'house of cards' and will collapse upon itself. I sure hope she's right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. That's a stretch
Issues about gay folk and abortion are the connection to interest in the Vatican, not Mary. Btw, I was raised R.C. and went to Catholic school for 12 years.

This post is my last word on the topic - please be more careful next time. We don't need extraneous religious issues given status in our political life. Take the last word if you feel the need. I'm done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBHagman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Don't tell me you care about every story.
If they can put a front-page, above-the-fold story in The Washington Post about a radio station changing format or a team losing a particular game, there can be a headline somewhere in the paper on small changes in relations between major denominations. This stuff has been going on for centuries! :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chicago Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. Oh good, they're both still wrong if you ask me and the Gnostic Gospels
but then, what actually happened doesn't really seem to matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. I'll drink some Jesus Juice to that!
Please -- could there be even more of a navel gazing discussion than this! LOL

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
11. It's an example of ecumenicism...
Which the new Pope seems to favor, despite what some have said.

The statement is "not just an in-house document of Anglicans and Roman Catholics" but should have broad interest among other Protestants, said Archbishop Peter Carnley, Anglican primate for Australia. He is co-chairman with Seattle Catholic Archbishop Alexander Brunett of the Anglican-Roman Catholic International Commission, which wrote the document....

Such journeys toward unity have had the backing of popes and Anglican archbishops of Canterbury for 40 years, he said, including the new pontiff, Pope Benedict XVI.


(From the article)

Note: The British exclamation "Bloody"--still not said in polite society when GBS wrote "Pygmalion"--is a contraction for "By Our Lady."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Merlin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
13. It's a case of Anglican capitulation to an imaginary Papal juggernaut.
Edited on Tue May-17-05 04:39 PM by Merlin
This is a foolish set of concessions on the part of the Anglican Church, and my guess is it will be rejected by the church at large.

Episcopalians and other Anglicans have always believed the Catholic position on Mary is imaginary and unjustified. It did not develop until invented in about the 11th century (an age of many Catholic absurdities like the implementation of celibacy and the initiation of the insane Crusades).

The real Mary was, no doubt, a fine woman. But to suggest she is a demigod, in some way different from all others in the human race, is as nonsensical as to insist upon the validity of the idea of "Original Sin" which necessitates both the Immaculate Conception nonsense and the Divine Virginal Insemination nonsense.

It all, by logic, requires the silliness of Adam and Eve in the Garden and the all-knowing, all-powerful, all-good God Almighty being outwitted by a talking snake, outraged by the frailty of His Own creations and determined to place a curse called "Original Sin" upon A&E's progeny as punishment.

What a pile of nonsense!


The Anglos should be moving away from this rubbish, not toward it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
15. The Esoteric Meaning Of Virginity In Matter Of Mary Refers To The Area
Edited on Tue May-17-05 05:12 PM by cryingshame
of the body ruled by Virgo- the small intestine wherein chyle is formed.

Also, Immaculate Conception refers to the fact that we originate from the One Thing and, even when we are inhabiting bodies that SEEM to be seperate, always remain in touch with that One Thing.

In other words, Cosnciousness descends into physical matter but always maintains a capacity to access the power of that Original Consciousness.

Physical matter is never really 'corrupted'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
16. I prefer George Harrison's interpretation of Mary
Let it be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 01:33 AM
Response to Original message
17. Now if the Vatican would just...
...retroactively grant Henry VIII that divorce, maybe they could make some REAL progress...

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC