Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Presbyterian church deciding case of pastor who performed gay marriages

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 02:16 AM
Original message
Presbyterian church deciding case of pastor who performed gay marriages
By Peter Smith
[email protected]
April 26, 2008

... The Rev. Jane Adams Spahr, a California minister and an advocate for gays and lesbians, is defending herself against charges that she violated the church constitution by conducting same-sex marriage ceremonies ...

No one disputes that Spahr performed marriage ceremonies for two lesbian couples, one in California in 2005 and the other in New York in 2004. Neither state allows civil marriages of same-sex couples, but Spahr said she considered the ceremonies to be "ecclesiastical" marriages ...

http://www.courier-journal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080426/NEWS01/804260460


Presbyterian court to rule on pastor who married lesbian couples
By Jim Niemi
[email protected]

... In 2006, the Redwoods Presbytery court affirmed her ministry and ruled that same-sex marriages are not "outside of, or contrary to, the essentials of the Reformed faith as understood by the Presbytery of the Redwoods."

But that ruling was challenged by those who prosecuted Spahr, and was appealed to the next-highest church court, the Synod Permanent Judicial Commission. The synod court overturned the presbytery decision and ordered Redwoods Presbytery to censure Spahr, but recommended the minimum penalty, a rebuke.

Spahr then appealed to the denomination's highest court, the General Assembly Permanent Judicial Commission, which heard the case Friday at the Presbyterian Church USA Center in Louisville ...

http://www.kentucky.com/779/story/387136.html


Top church court reviews gay marriage case
By BRUCE SCHREINER
The Associated Press
LOUISVILLE, Ky.

... During a two-hour hearing, an attorney for the Rev. Jane Spahr said the now-retired California minister committed no offense and followed her conscience when she married two lesbian couples in 2004 and 2005.

"This is a community of faith that knows well that all of its members are equal in God's eyes," attorney Sara Taylor said during the hearing at denominational headquarters in Louisville ...

Taylor told the church court there is no mention of same-gender ceremonies in the church constitution. She said Spahr presided over the weddings of the lesbian couples as a "right of conscience" and out of her efforts to minister to the "marginalized" ...

While the church constitution reserves marriage for a man and a woman, the top Presbyterian court ruled in 2000 ministers can bless same-sex unions as long as the ceremonies are not called a marriage and don't mimic traditional weddings.

http://www.pe.com/ap_news/California/KY_Presbyterians_Gays_338627C.shtml


Decision expected Monday for minister who performed same-sex marriages
By GUY KOVNER
THE PRESS DEMOCRAT
Saturday, April 26, 2008

... Spahr, 65, a lesbian activist and retired Presbyterian minister from San Rafael, declined to predict an outcome following a two-hour hearing Friday at Presbyterian Church headquarters in Louisville, Ky. "It's been wonderfully inspiring," Spahr said in a telephone interview. "So we wait, but we're with wonderful family and friends" ...

http://www.pressdemocrat.com/EarlyEdition/article_view.cfm?recordID=9180&publishdate=04/26/2008
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. If they allow gay marrage...
I will have more respect for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. Wedding ceremony != marriage
Unless the ceremonies were done in Mass. (and they weren't), they were never marriages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC