Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Thy Will Be Done: Nelson Rockefeller, Evangelism, And the Conquest of the Amazon in the Age of Oil

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Books: Non-Fiction Donate to DU
 
EPIC1934 Donating Member (172 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 11:34 PM
Original message
Thy Will Be Done: Nelson Rockefeller, Evangelism, And the Conquest of the Amazon in the Age of Oil
This is the single greatest work of non-fiction I have ever read. I will blather on about it later, right now I dont have the requisite energy. Please get it, I got one used on Amazon and it only took about three days even though it looks hard to get. It is an amazing masterpeice that was so dangerous it needed to be burried. authors Colby and Dennet
-----
Let me speak frankly; if Major General William P. Yarborough were in the room, I might have some logisitcal difficulties in mellowing out.

Recently I learned some interesting things about Yarborough in Columbia during the Kennedy years. This interested me
because of what I had read in William Pepper's book An Act of State (2nd edition, April 2008) about Yarborough's involvement with the 902nd MIG which is described as present in Memphis, after flying in around 4AM on 4-4-68.

First some points from An Act of State:

* Pepper describes a relationship between the 902nd MIG and Carlos Marcello's org:

They were jointly involved in an extenisve gun running venture. Weapons stolen from army bases and
armories were delivered to the Marcello organization which arranged for their sale in Latin and South
America and elsewhere There proceeds were split equally and the 902nd used this "black" money for
covert operations. The operational link between the army and the mob was, apparently, a now deceased
20th SFG captain in New Orelans who dies in a suspicious car crash. I recalled Warren's accoud of running
guns from Camp Shelby to New Orleans where htey wre deliverd to Marcello's man Zip Chimento. I also
recalled Glenda Grabo's description of Raul and his associates picking up guns which were deliverd by water
and unloaded at Houston docks.

Downie also ties two other people tot hei activity. One was a senior Mossad agent working in South America
who acted as a senior liason to the US military and the CIA. The second was an officer of the 111th MIG
based at Frot McPherson in Georgia. Downie urged us to stay away from these individuals. (pp.76-77 Act of
State, 2nd edition)



* Earlier in the book Pepper gives this background on Yarborough:

The Eight MIG-- the 902nd-- was under the command of the army's Assistant Chief of Staff for Inteligence, who
from Demember 1966 until July 1968 was Major General William P Yarborough, the founder of units known
as the Green Berets. The MIG officers were responsible for eye to eye surveillance operations which included
audio and visual recordings of people ad events designated as targets. Dr. King was a target and throughtout
the last year of his life wa under surveillance by one or aother MIG team. Closely related to the USAINTC struture
at the time was the separate intelligence office under ACSI Yarborough.

In addition to controlling the 902nd MIG, he supervised the Counterintelligence Analysis Board (CIAB). This
analyzed a wide range of MIG-produced intelligence and forwarded reports directly tot he ACSI. The 902nd MIG
was a highly secretive organization, carrying outsome of the most sensitive assignments. Warren had always
refused to discuss the 902nd, saying anyone intereste in the "90 Deuce" should dig a deep hole.

Pepper points out that the 902nd was the only MIG that was explicitly authorized to undertake BOTH domestic and foreign ops.

Ok now lets turn to Thy Will be Done, and what it says about Yarborough earlier, when he was in Columbia in 1962:


Kennedy went to Columbia in 1962 to urge reforms. His trip was a huge media success. But Rightists in Columbia didnt want to make any reforms, instead wanting to eliminate groups of semi-autonomous peasant republics in around the Macarena Mountains.

The second event boding well for the military occurred a week after Kennedy's departure. In the town of Buga, a
a bomb exploded amid a Christmas procession; 51 people were killed, and more than 100 wounded. This was the
pretext the Pentagon needed to send top U.S. couterinsurgency experts from Fort Bragg, led by Brigadier
General William P. Yarborough, commanding general of Fort Bragg's Special Warfare center.< here the authors[br />point out Yarborough's later explits working with COINTELPRO "AND THEN DEPUTY ATTORNEY GNERAL WARREN
CHRISTOPHER, AGAINST AMERICAN CIVILIANS IDENTIFITED AS 'DISSIDENT ELEMENTS' (MY EMPH.)]
Yarborough specifically targetted the civlil rights movement and the "anti-Vietnam/anti-draft movements,"
exteneding the army's intellignece gathering beyond "subversion" and "dissident groups" to "prominant persons"
who were "friendly" with "leaders of the disturbance or sympathetic with their plans"

Yarborough's team arrived in Columbia on February 2, 1962. Lleras Canargo's press censorhsip worked
smoothly. The Chief of Staff for the COlumbian army turned out the entire officer corps staffing the Columbian
Army headquarters, but no press account appeared in Bogata's newspapers. Yarborough's team next consulted
US Embasy consul Henry Dearborn, the former de facto CIA chief of station in he Dominican Republic.

Dearborn, a verteran operative in Latin America, was an old acquaintantce of the CIA's J.C. King; both had
operated in Peronist Argentina after WWII. Recently, Dearborn had been transfered to Columbia from the
Dominican Republic, where he and King engineered the CIA's delivery of weapons that were used to assassinate
dictator Rafael Trujillo in 1961.

Now ... the focus of his attention was, however, the VII Brigade at the cattle town of Villavicencio,
gateway to the southern plains that slope gradually into the tropical Amazon basin. Here, in the department of
Meta was where the action was. Refugees from army attacks on the peasant republics had settled here and
turned to guerrilla warfare when attacked.

The VII Brigade kept most of its twenty-two outposts in this region, supplemented by many more police
outposts and a apramilitary nonuniformed cavalry, modeled after the Texas rangers and called "Rurales."
The Rurales were controlled by DAS, Colombia's secret police, and like the Rangers, were not known for
kindness to Indians...... Specifically Yarborough recommended Helio Couriers < anyone hear much about this[br />weird plane that the CIA eventually gets ahold of via Summer Linguistics Institute and JAARS base in Charlotte
NC? Lots on this weird plane in this book]....


Yarborough sets up a vast interrogation and counterinsurgency network that seems to share some similarities with the
later Pheonix Program.

The Inter-American Geographic Survey would be enlisted to make aerial maps of guerrilla-affected ares. "Villages
and ares known to harbor bandits should be alleged by the government to be feeding information to the government
Polygraph teams should elicit such information as is neededfor this operation.....
It was all vintage Lansdale, to whom, after all Yarborough ultimately reported at the top of the chain of counter-
insurgency command ....


In 1962 Yarborough writes in his report on the Columbian operations:

It is the considered opinion of the survey team... that a concerted country team effort should be made now
to select civilian and military personnel for clandestine training in resistance operations in case they are needed
later. This should be done with a view toward development of a cvil and military structure for exploitation in
the event of the Colombian's internal security sytem deteriorates further......

Shortly after Cam signed the contract and General Yarborough's report
was read at a March meeting of the Special Group in Washington, Columbians near Villavicencio watched a long
column of army trucks bearing U.S.insignia pass through. The Column headed south, toward the Macarena
Mountains, just east of where SIL's base would be located. No troops ever came
out, they claimed. Explosions were heard rubling from the Macarena Moutnains, howeverer. Soon afterword the
Columbian military ruled that airspace over the mountains was off-limits for all commercial airplanes. Over the
years, reports would appear sporaically of planes being lost. Some pilots whe strayed overhead and did come out
reported seeing air runways and telecommunications antennas. In the early 1970s, the Columbian military would
deny and foreign base or presence in the Macarena. Only American strockholders of Loeb family-owned APCO
Oil Company and those who read APCO's annual reports knew better. APCO entered the Mcarena in 1967. In
1976, an APCO map showed that the Maceraena had been honeycombed with clandestine runways.

By then, Standard Oil of New Jersey, Texaco, and Gulf had joined other oil companies in drilling for oil in the
Llanos. JAARS's Helio Courirers were taking off for Villavicencio from Lomalinda, the grey-misted Macarena
Mountains hovering in the distance like a Mirage. (pp. 392-395, Thy Will Be Done)


How long had this cooperative effort between the 902nd MIG and US military cover ops in Latin America extend before 1968?

Yarborough's experience on both ends of this relationship seems noteworthy.

What about Warren Christopher in 1968. If he was working with Yarborough, what about MH CHAOS connections, possibly involving a young Bill Clinton in 1968? Did Bill have an interesting precious relationship with his future Secretary of State?
Refresh | +3 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-09 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks..I'll check it out..
although my appetite for reading my countries atrocities has waned of late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
EPIC1934 Donating Member (172 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-09 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Here is a review I wrote for Amazon about this Great book.
Let me be at least the second reviewer to say this is among the very best books I have ever read.

It makes the exotic seem at the center of change and hundreds of aspects of domestic politics gleam with light from angles never imagined. Even its wide ranging title fails to capture the all encompasing and yet never laborious nature of its contagious curiosities.

And these curiosites are not peripheral or for amusement. One is dead certain that one is reading about the turn in the American Century. The 1960's was a time when the US was making a decision that few knew about; should we remain country that produces goods for the rest of the world working more multilatterally (at least compared to today) or should we become more unilatteral and focus our economy more on direct investment in Latin America, oil and weapons. This book shows the connections between domestic politics and US intervention in Latin America in startling new ways.

As another reviewer mentioned this is in many ways a book about the Kennedys as well. It shows a clear difference between their policies and those of Johnson, Rockefeller, Nixon and those that followed. This difference is not based on naive assumptions of liberal authors. These authors know their history, and do not spare any of the grim realities that have defined US relationships with Latin America. They call imperialism what it is. Yet those who subscribe to the view that Kennedy was "just another Cold Warrior "-- as is virtually a pre-requisite to be published with any degree of publicity right now-- would do well to read this book.

A must for students of Latin American History, US capitalism, US imperialism, the Vietnam war, US evangelism, the US oil industry, Nelson Rockefeller, the US cold war, and the transformation of the US economy and the roots of NAFTA. All in all a stunningly ambitious read, and one really gets a sense that the country NEEDS this book. One can certainly see many powerfull interests that would rather see it burried! It comes as no surprise that the DuPont family tried mightily to block the publication of Colby's first book. It seems reviewers have done the next best thing with this one: it is a crime how little this diamond it known. it is because of the bloodyness of the rough and US responsibility.

Oh did I mention the CIA? This is a book about the CIA. It is particularly dangerous because its description of the CIA is inseperable from the movement of American Capitalism itself. Hence it would be tougher to marginalize. One more reason for powerful interest to bury it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
EPIC1934 Donating Member (172 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Rockefeller Commission
This book is so eclectic that nothing is "representative." That said, I found its description of the Rockfeller Commission of 1975, to be provoctive and perhaps usefull in placing it in historical context of prior and later developments in the CIA's negotiation of the 1970's (1970's negotiation of the CIA?)

The authors put the commission in terms of a post-Watergate control mechanism for information about past CIA abuses. They see Watergate as a reprisal by the CIA against Nixon after Nixon threatened to use old CIA stories as blackmail with the goal of getting Helms to cooperate in the Watergate Coverup.

(I wonder to what extent the Hunt forgeries of documents blaming Kennedy for the Diem killings were central to this.Even Bland Ghost Writer, Stanley Kutler acknowleges " on June 19 Colson urged that Howard Hunt's White House safe be confiscated....Later that afternoon Dean and his Associate Counsel,
Fred Fielding, sifted the contents of Hunt's safe, finding evidence of more"dirty tricks," including an attempt to fabricate a direct link between President
Kennedy and the assassination of South Vietnamese President Diem" (The Wars of Watergate, p. 216). Writer J. Anthony Lukas, offers much more on the
attmepts to link Kennedy to Diem:

Two days later, at a meeting with Haldeman, Ehrlichman, and Mitchell, the President discussed a political strategy which
would keep the origins of the Vietnam War "front and center so that the Democrats would "squable about it." They agreed
that the "Diem incident" ws the "best ground" for attack because it involved both Averill Harrima-- a Muskie supporter--
and Ted Kennedy. Nixon suggested that several Republican senators might pick up his accusation of September 16th and
' demand that Conein be released from the silence" required by the CIA regulations. "Let the CIA take a whipping on this,
Nixon said, demanding that the agency deliver its "entire Diem file" immediately. (Nightmare, p.91)


Lucas claims that the initial purpose of this creative autopsy of the Diem murder was to hurt the campaign of Ted Kennedy, especailly among
Catholics, by claiming to prove that JFK had ordered the killing of a fellow Catholic. But in the above quote its as if he is trying to kill at least one other
bird with a wider shotgun approach. But what of his comment on letting the CIA 'take a whipping'? Does it suggest that Nixon himself thought that the
Conein and Kennedy were on the same page about Diem, when they really were not? With this wide angle blast, was Nixon threatening to raise questions that might have shown that the CIA was following its own agenda with the Diem Killing? And was Nixon aware that this would happen?

Lucas also offers an interesting quote from Hunt that makes it seem like Hunts forged JFK-Diem documents originated at the suggestion of the White House
(Colson) and not the CIA:

After about a week, Colson asked him, "What kind of material have you dug up in the files that would indicate Kennedy
complicity in Diem's death?" Hunt said that nombody who read the cables would have any doubt about it, but no single
cable would establish it. 'you'd have to take a sequence of there of four cables, be aware of their context, and speculate
on what was contained in the cables missing from the sequence. According to Hunt, Colson asked, 'Do you think you
could improve on them?' Hunt said he would need technical assistance, particularly in finding the original typwriters
on which the cables had been typed. "Well, we won't be able to give you any technical help," Hunt recalls Colson saying.
This is too hot. See what you can do on your own" (Nightmare, p. 91)


All of this makes me wonder if the Diem killing and its very contested narration was not very high up the list of reasons that the CIA felt they had to get
to take serious steps in getting rid of Nixon.)

Note these paragraphs leading up to the creation of the Rockefeller Commission:

In Hersh's New Year's Eve story, " the Bay of Pigs thing" resurfaced with potentially astounding implications: "The Times reported
Sunday that the new domestic unit was formed in 1964 but Mr. Hunt realled that it was assmebled shortly after the failure of the Bay
of Pigs operaion in 1961. Many Agency men connected with that failure were shunted into the new domestic unit' Hunt placed the date
of its founding in 1962, before, not after the Kennedy assassinaiton, and noted that Helms was strenuously opposed to its establishment.
Who, then, ran this secret operation of Bay of Pigs veterans? (Morales with his AMOT connections he had developed prior to the invasion,
who he then siphoned of to Fort Bennning, separate from the other group of returning BOP veterans?????) According to once source at the
DIA, such opperations fell within the domain of the Clandestine Services chif of the Western Hemishphere Division: Nelson Rockefeller's
old friend from CIAA days in the Brazilian Amazon, Colonel J.C. King.

Four days later, after an even more sensitve oral briefing by Colby in the White House, President Ford announced that he was appointing Nelson
Rockefeller to head an eight-member "blue-ribbon commission (including Nelson's old friend and coinvestor in Belgian Congo properties,
C. Doulas Dillon) to probe the CIA's illegal operations n the United States. (Thy Will Be Done, p. 735)

J.C. King. After reading this book, which is chock-full of ties between King and Neslon Rockefeller, I am wondering if I, for one, may have underestimated
his involvement in the original multi-faceted assassination plan, the one that would have culminated in a US invasion of Cuba. Recall that he was very
involved in the development of the original BOP invasion plan, and undoubtedly knew of the points in the 1959 and 1960 Castro assassination points that
would could have either directly or indirectly implicated Nixon and old FBI contacts from WWII days when the FBI was stronger in Latin America. King is also described as one of the strongest detractors from Kennedy's Alliance For Progress.

It is also worth noting that King began his career in Latin America while working for Johsnon and Johnson, the US drug company who dug a lot of the
Amazonian ingredients. Later, with Rockefeller money he created a front for MK-ULTRA research called the (Amazon Natural Drug Company). He was heavily involved in the Brazil coup of 1964, the one that Rockefeller's man on the WC found considerably more interesting than attending meetings with
Earl-- because of Rockefeller mining investments, among many many others in Brazil.


(Nelson Rockefeller) recommended keeping secret what ins some cases even Colby though unnecessary.(Recall Colby's
by canoe in 1996 N.H.) But Neson had personal,not just official, reasons for secrecy. As Eisenhiower's under
secretary of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare (HEW) and then as his special assistant on Cold War strategy
and psychological warfare, Nelson knew about many of the CIA's covert actions, including the mind-control experiments
(which were funded partyly through the HEW) and assassination plots. Indeed, as chairman of the National Security Council's
Special Group, he was briefed on ALL covert operations and would have had to approve someo of the most questionable ones,
including coups and assassinations abroad and continuting mind-control experiments at home.

President Ford was particulary interested in having Nelson "look into this assassination business" Nelson understood the
implications immediately. He already knew about the attempts on Castro's life and the theory that such attempts had
backfired on Kennedy in Dallas "This was another way of chopping my head off and getting me out there where I was the one
who was putting the finger on the Kennedy's, see, as chairman of the committee. Also getting me into an impossible hope
because I happened to know this thing had been investigated a good many times there was a lot of very interesting leads.

With a lot of intersting leads why was it so impossible? By "chopping my head off" was Nelson here implying that his own investigation was limited
becasuse it could lead to Nelson Rockefeller and his close associate J.C. King? This "chopping my head" head off seems to be open to a number of
different interpretations.

Faced with Nesons's threat to resign, Ford dropped his insistence on a written report on this specific subject. But the investigation would
go forward.Neson began assembling the case for a Castro-Kennedy Assassination link. 'We got this information and we put it together
and it was hot' (This piecing together sounds similar to the alledged Hunt-Colson plan of four years before. Nixon had previously thought
of emphasizing Kennedy-Castro assassination alledged ties, before setteling on JFK-Diem instead N.H.) ...... Unable to find any evidence
that proved the Kennedys had ordered the CIA to try to kill Castro, Nelson gave up the investigation. Avoiding having to report "got
the President off the hook, got me off the hook, got it right where it belonged: in the Congress.

Despite Neson's claim that he was sticking ot the commission's original madate to invstigate only the CIA's domestic activities,
some activities that bore on oprations overseas were addressed in Nelson's report, but in a highly contained and selective manner.

The CIA's illegal cooperation with the NSA in monitoring phone conversations by narcottigs traffickers between Latin America and the
US in 1973 was considered a worthy target for criticism; the CIA's ties to American cocaine traffickers operationg between the United
States and Columbia were not.

The CIA's support for the activiteis of the Cabinet Committee on narcotics Control, including invstigations abroad, was reported; the
involvement of the CIA's Air America in the transport of the very Southeast Asian heroin that the committee was so concerned about
(and ultimately reported the futility of trying to stop) was not.

Nixon's abuse of the CIA on such matters as access to files and equipment, Watergate, and requisitioning more than $33,000 from
the CIA to pay for White House responses to mail on the Cambodia invasion was fair game; The CIA's conspiring with mobsters and
Cuban exiles in the US to assassinate the Cuban head of state was not. Newither was the CIA's abuse of the names of President
Kennedy and Attorney General Robert Kennedy after the missile crisis to continue these assassination attempts illegally and without
authorization.

While taking a properly critical tone and makig some sound structural and procedural recommendations to correct the most glaring
errors of process and of the government's line of authority, Neson, in most cases, projected confidence in the Agency's claim that
the abuses had been stopped and reforms had already been enacted, including a prohibition against the assassination of foreign
leaders. He did not mention the CIA's unauthorized storage of curare, cobra venom, shellfish poison, and other toxins and biological
weapons, in direct wiolation of President Nixon's executive order of February 1970 to destroy the stockpiles. Among the scientists
collaborating with the CIA in the illegal storage of these biological weapons were four scientists at Rockefeller University (p.736-737,
They Will Be Done)

The authors present the Rockefeller Commission as an CIA controlled revelation of some of their secrets, that was made necessary by its
conflict with Nixon over Watergate, and at the same time a sign of the CIA's triumph over another president who thought he could control it.

THIS IS A VERY ACCURATE DESCRIPTION OF THE INTELLIGENCE "OVERSITE" OF THE MID SEVENTIES, THE ONLY TIME THAT THERE WAS ANY REAL OVERSITE. Even the revelations were Limited hangouts"

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
scholarsOrAcademics Donating Member (194 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. its historical as well
ie. Europe.The name of the game is to learn political thinking. The feuds of the different Intelligence agencies spilling over into domestic politics. eg. what is the hold of Israeli intelligence over U.S. foreign policy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
scholarsOrAcademics Donating Member (194 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. 960 pages
last index page is on 960. This is a large book, but it will not take any longer than the 224 pages including index of the book: LATE KANT: towards another law of the Earth by Peter Fenves (2003) that I'm also in the process of reading. Philosophy does not read like a narrative. I just checked out the Colby book today, and I was a little surprised at the size.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
EPIC1934 Donating Member (172 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. WARNING THIS IS THE LAST LIVING US BOOK
caution: this is one of the last books with a live curiosity inside. It goes everywhere, landing on things you thought you knew about. It is further left than the fake kennedy bashers ever were, because it shows power alive and in action; it does not promote the mantra of the premissible-left: the president controls the CIA at all times the president controlls the CIA at all times the presdident controlls the CIA at all times ohhhhhhhhhhhmmmmmmmmm ok Mr. Chomsky now your books are suddenly in airport bookstands in 2002 the president controlls the CIA at all times the pres.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
EPIC1934 Donating Member (172 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. MKULTRA and Latin American CIA activity
J.C. KING> GARLAND "DEE" WILLIAMS> MIKE TSALICKIS> MKULTRA

First let me note again that this book argues that the assassination of JFK and his replacement by LBJ marked a significant turning point for
Latin America. Under LBJ the, the book argues, the US was much more tolerant of dictators, and even helped install them. Also, urged
Nelson Rockefeller and his many business contracts in South America and its governments and by his many contacts inside virtually every
agency of the US government, LBJ was much friendlier to direct US investment concerns in South America as compared with JFK.

After the coup of 1964, the CIA and the Brazilian Intelligence did a many things to unify South American governments with US Cold War
ideology, which meant that anyone suggesting nationalization of natural resources must be a stooge of Moscow.

Who here has heard of Mike Tsalickis? He was promoted in National Geographic as The Tarzan of The Amazon and his career smells of
other things besides the Rosewood he exported. He began as an exporter of exotica animals in 1946, with his business based in Tarpon
Springs, Florida, just north of Tampa. Next he became involved with the new St. Petersburg airline Aerovias Sud Americana (ASA)

* Then in 1953 he convinced ASA to try a freight line between Leticia, Bogata and Panama
* After being faced with new competition Mike T. made two "fateful business decisions in 1957": he went into the business of
shipping research animals, "especially the white -lipped marmoset and the squirrel monkey"
* He also set up a Rosewood exporting company that worked closely with an ex-Nazi who had escaped to Argentina through
the ratline in 1946, when JC King was on the receiving end. This ex Nazi went by the name of Von Steinbeck and he was
involved in exporting cocaine. Later Mike T. would be arrested in a scheme involving the shipping of lots of cocaine inside
hollowed-out rosewood logs.

OK let me now quote this:

That year(1966) King opened shop in Iquitos and hired Mike Tsalickis as ANDCO's supply agent in Leticia. In May
the State Department also opened shop in Leticia, setting up a U.S. consulate with some fanfare and appointing
Tsilickis as unofficial U.S. Consul...... Tsalickis's involvement with ANDCO's notorious Dee Williams, however, raised
some eyebrows. Williams hired Tsalickis just as the Amazon's Tarzan was expanding the research side of his animal
export business. In 1967, Tsalickis bought an island in one of the Amazon's remote tributaries between Leticia and
Iquitos.......Yet the extraordinary security measures Tsalickis took inspired rumors. A staff of eighteen men armed with
walkie-talkies partoled the island, keeping out intruders and maintaining the island's isolation. Tsalickis's customers
inside the US included the US Naval Toxicology Unit, the US Army, and many research institutions where scientists had
been involved in MKULTRA experiments. The monkeys were used in a wide range of experiments,including tests for
cancer viruses, brain tumors, poisons, and psychoactive drugs.... But it was the 1975 arrest that revealed that more
was at stake than drug smuggling. Between the arrival of Dee Williams in 1967 and Tsalickis's first arrest eight years
later, the CIA's counterinsurgency operations in Bolivia, particularly-- but also in Peru and Ecuador-- greatly enhanced
the power of drug-smuggling uniformed warlords and Nazi refugees. The Springboard for these operations and their
onerous result was the search for J.C. King's old prey, Che Guevara. (pp. 519-523, Thy Will Be Done)

Is this the same Garland Williams who played such an important role for the Federal Bureau of narcotics? Douglas Valentine writes
in his FBN history:

Curiously, a CIA officer named Garland "Dee " Wlliams arrived in Peru in 1967 as ANDCO'S Director of Operations. THis
is intriguing, first because Garland H. Williams is such an important figure in FBN history, and because he retired from
government service in May, 1964, which left him available for a secret assignment in South America. Our Garland Williams
was a career narcotic agent, and Garland "Dee" Williams "knew the way of drug smugglers" Our Garland was a professional
soldier and dedicated anti-communist, and "Dee" Williams and J.C. King used ANDCO as a cover to advise Peru's special
forces in jungle warfare operations, so they could combat the indigenous people and their Cuban advisers. Furthermore,
our Garland had a background in Chemical warfare, and may have helped George White set up the MKUTRA pad in San
Francisco, while Garland "Dee" Williams was involved in MKULTRA research. To this end he hired exotic animal exporter
Mike Tsalickis as his guide. Tsalickis based his operation in Leticia on the Amazon River, where Peru and Columbia rub
shoulders. While serving as the government's consular officer in the region, Tsalickis helped Williams and King obtain
plant specimens for use in post-MKULTRA projects.

Arrested for smuggling over a ton oc cocaine into Florida in 1988, Tsalickis was still in prison in 1996 when the author
sent him a photo of former FBN agent Garland H. Williams and asked if the man in the phot was Dee Williams from ANDCO.
Tsalickis said he was not. garland Williams's family insists that after leaving Africa in 1963 and retiring in 1964, he married
and settled down near Memphis Tennessee.

Despite this curious case of the name "Garland Williams" appearing in regard to an espionage affair with a drug angle--for
there was also the "Colonel Williams" who funded the Pawley-Cook public relations blitz in Taiwan in 1950-- it seems more
than more coincidence that the CIA was present at the hub of world cocaine production in 1966, just as Ricord's Group
France, with Mafia financing through Tom Buscetta was organizing the business into a global industry. (Douglas Valentine,
The Strengnth of the Wolf: The Secret History of America's War On Drugs, p. 385)

Colby and Dennett's book make abundantly clear the J.C. Kings "retirement" was about as Semi as conceivable. There is probably no other
book with as much on J.C. King.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
EPIC1934 Donating Member (172 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. When RFK said "We eat Rockefellers for breakfast" ... he was unaware the menu had changed
Now a few paragraphs of the authors' about Mr. HeDeservedIt aka RFK :


* RFK disagreed with Johnson, Rockefeller and the CIA on their claims that local Communist party members were behind a popular revolt that
demanded the return of Juan Bosch to D.R. RFK refused to support the invasionof DR in 1965.

* "Two monts later, during a trip to Latin America Kennedy's differences with Rockefeller
on foreign affairs became more direc. Kennedy had a bitter argument with the U.S. deputy charge' d'affaires in Peru over
Standard Oil's and the embasy's equating Standard Oil's interest with those of the United States "out there" question from Obama today? How can we see how far right we have come if this aspect of RFK is censored, or
deemed not worthy of discussion? There is no basis of comparison thanks to Alex and Amy... but isn't that what the
Foundation Funded Left is all about?. Sorry, N. H. again] Fortunately, the explosive Standard Oil contraversy did not specifically
come up at Kennedy's press conference. "He did receive a general question on nationalization," Ambassador J. Wesley Jones
reported to Secretary of State Dean Rusk, "to which he responded that question of nationalization to be decided
by country concerned and would be respected by us so long as there is just and fair compensation"

If Kennedy's comment gave oil executives and embassy officials the jitters, it was still only official U.S. policy and probably
the best that could be expected from the Liberal Senator. As Kennedy left Lima for Santiago, the capital of Chile, and
a tour of conditions in American-owned mines, the embassy was relieved it had been spared contraversy.

However, Kennedy had had a "frank and free" discussion that did not get reported to the ambasadork of to Rusk, until a story
appeared in the local press. He had met with Peruvian artists and intellectuals, who immediately asked about Standard Oil.
"Are yo aware of the problem of IPC
I understand Presidne belaunde is trying to get an acceptable solution form the company, said Kennedy.

Perhaps. But first it would be established what is understood as acceptable and then, what is more serious, that such
solution will not be accepted by IPC

The Peruvians were only repeating what was commonly understood in both Lima and Washington. Johnson had already sent
to Peru fellow Texan Robert B. Anderson, Eisenhower's former deupty defense secretary and treasury secretary and a man
who knew the Rockefellers, having worked with Nelson in the Special Group and having been involved in subsequent
business ties between texas oil interests and Nelson's International Basic Economy Corporation. Anderson had called on
President Belaunde in mid-July "to explain to him that his demands beyond anything an international oil company
could accept.

then David Rockefeller made a trip to Lima, arriving a week ahead of Kennedy, to persuade the Belaunde government to
back down. Belaunde's officials listened closely, for here was an unparalleled combination of financial and political power
in the flesh of one man. David was not just the brother of one of the best-known Americans in Latin America and not just
president of the Chase bank. He also represented the Council For Latin America, the enlarged offspring of the Business
Group, which now numbered over 200 companies, 85 percent of all American firms conducting business in Latin America.
Furthermore, as if to make the change of fortune since Dallas absolutely clear, David Rockefeller now had official status
in the Johnson administration as chairman of the finance committee of the US Business Advisory Council of the Alliance for
Progress (p. 538-539, Thy Will Be Done)
--------------- SKIP OVER THIS PART IF YOU HAVE ALREADY READ IT ---
It occurs to me that to understand the significace of this last comment it might be necessary to recall this previous description of the
transition from JFK to LBJ as it was perceived in Latin America


Brazil 1964 - Brazil is the largest nation in the South American continent, and one of the world's richest in terms of natural resources. In 1961 a young idealistic nationalist named Joo Goulart became president and he began promoting policies of land reform, nationalization, and industrialization to try to make the most of his nation's enormous potential.

During Goulart's presidency he became good friends with President Kennedy who began the Alliance for Progress foreign aid initiatives involving Brazil in 1961. These initiatives were made on a government-to-government basis, sidestepping the World Bank and the IMF and the profit-driven initiatives of Wall Street, and they were widely criticized by Establishment spokesmen such as Nelson and David Rockefeller, and in Wall Street mouthpieces such as the Wall Street Journal and Fortune magazine, and in McCloy's CFR journal Foreign Affairs.

Gerard Colby in his book Thy Will Be Done offers David Rockefeller's perspective on how the United States should approach foreign economic development, and the quote within it is from Rockefeller's paper, "A Reappraisal of the Alliance for Progress," written in February of 1963,

The Cold War doctrine of counterinsurgency had brought U.S. policy full circle, blurring means and ends: Development was necessary for order, and order was necessary for development.
David Rockefeller had explained the first half of this thesis from an exclusively corporate interpretation of development in 1963. He had called upon President Kennedy to shift foreign economic aid away from government-to-government aid. Such aid allowed governments in underdeveloped countries to fund publicly owned enterprises that competed with privately owned (often American controlled) companies. Local government aid, in turn, encouraged political independence from Washington and greater national sovereignty - including nationalization of American holdings.
David wanted Kennedy to proclaim a shift in foreign-aid policy toward private entrepreneurs, both American and allied local investors, on the grounds that private enterprise per se was the basis of freedom:
"The first requirement is that the governments - and, as far as possible, the people - of Latin America know that the U.S. has changed its policy, so as to put primary stress on improvement in the general business climate as a prerequisite for social development and reform."
But David went beyond the classical liberal argument of the market basis for individual liberty. He extended it to suggest that U.S. policy should not merely prefer private enterprise, but should oppose public enterprise and its creation out of private corporations, no matter what the public's grievances or the corporation's crimes. David wanted a general U.S. policy that discouraged all nationalizations...
David and his corporate allies feared "possible changes in the rules of the game." To soothe corporate jitters in corporate boardrooms and securities exchanges, the "obstacles" that a developing nation usually erected to protect its infant industries, small farms, and working-class' buying power had to be done away with... Multinational corporate ideology had not yet advanced to the point of asserting that these protections were "outmoded" in their global marketplace, but this would be the next step.

JFK had very different ideas from David Rockefeller on how developing nations could realize their potential, and JFK's ideas were viewed much more favorably by those nations than were the Establishment's clever ideas promoting neo-imperialism. Perhaps that partially explains the anguish felt in Brazil, and worldwide, at the death of JFK, as Colby describes,

News of John Kennedy's murder sent a shudder through Brazil. Then came grief such as had not been shown for the death of any foreign leader since President Franklin D. Roosevelt. As then, Brazilians sensed that the world had taken a dramatic turn. A shroud had been hung over the face of the future, making the loss of Kennedy so unexpectedly personal. In Rio de Janeiro, rivers of grief swept through the streets as lines of people converged to mourn at the U.S. Embassy
Ambassador Lincoln Gordon was startled by the emotional crowds and what they could mean for President Lyndon B. Johnson in Latin America. "The experience we had that Friday afternoon and evening and the following weekend, I suppose, was repeated all over the world," he later recalled. "But in Rio it was a most dramatic thing. We opened a book at the chancery and another one at our residence, and over that weekend we had a line of people stretching for three of four blocks. It was continuous, day and night, of every class of person, every type, poor, rich, middle class, most of them weeping. It was a most extraordinary outpouring of emotion. So as a reaction to that, there would inevitably be some doubts about Kennedy's successor."
There was no doubt in Washington's higher circles, however, about Lyndon Johnson. The former Senate majority leader was no maverick like Kennedy. He was the classic insider among Washington's power brokers.
_
After Kennedy's death in November of 1963 major changes occurred in the Alliance for Progress program, changes which, as noted by Gibson, were received very favorably by David Rockefeller, as he made clear in a 1966 article he wrote for Foreign Affairs. Major changes also took place in the Brazilian government, when President Goulart was removed from power in a CIA-backed right-wing military coup in March of 1964. Brazil then endured two decades of death squads and dictatorships before any meaningful form of democracy was allowed to surface again.

The Establishment's interest in Brazil came chiefly through the Brazilian holdings of the Rockefeller family, which by the 1960's were extensive and diverse, from oil and mining, to electricity and communications, to cattle ranching, agriculture, and of course banking and investment. Much of them were managed under the umbrella of Nelson's massive multinational corporation, the International Basic Economy Corporation (IBEC), which also included holdings throughout the rest of South and Central America, in Southeast Asia, and in Africa as well. Rockefeller's influence in South America, and the influence of the IBEC, is documented extensively in the previously mentioned book written by Gerard Colby in 1995, Thy Will Be Done - The Conquest of the Amazon: Nelson Rockefeller and Evangelism in the Age of Oil. As the title infers, the Rockefeller's designs on the resources of South America were cleverly cloaked by their support for Protestant evangelism, especially through the missionary work of William Cameron Townsend and Wycliffe Bible Translators. In the United States Billy Graham was the most prominent name among a host of evangelicals that have always had strong financial backing from the secular Rockefellers. This may help explain how American corporate initiatives against Third World nationalism came to be falsely portrayed by Big Christianity in America as "Christian" initiatives fighting against "Communism."

Even before Joo Goulart became president of Brazil the CIA had his eye on him. Colby writes,

A stocky, handsome man with a large popular following, Goulart viewed himself as Getulio Vargas's spiritual successor in the struggle to rid Brazil of foreign domination. For that reason alone, he made Washington nervous at every step in his rise to power. As Vargas's minister of labor, he had built himself a base among Brazil's growing, restless working class. In gestures all too reminiscent of Argentina's Juan Peron, he found every opportunity to deliver rousing, populist speeches to the masses.

Colby describes how in 1963 Goulart presided over the nationalizing of a subsidiary of American-owned International Telephone and Telegraph (ITT). The president of ITT then began to furiously lobby congress for an amendment to Kennedy's 1962 foreign-aid bill that would immediately cancel all aid to any country that nationalized, repudiated a contract, or specially taxed or regulated any American company. According to Colby,

Such a Big Stick approach appalled President Kennedy, who worried that it would further enflame Third World nationalism, appear to corroborate Soviet propaganda about "U.S. imperialism," and force the United States to take the side of American companies more often than was merited.

Kennedy fought the amendment to the bill, and then helped mediate a settlement between ITT and the Brazilian government. Afterwards, Goulart made an offer to buy out all American-owned utilities that were squeezing the Brazilian economy with steadily jacked up rates. Colby writes,

Kennedy endorsed the idea. He wanted to avoid Brazilian anger at rising electric bills. "It's that damned U.S. company," he thought Brazilians would say when their monthly bills arrived.

Unfortunately for Brazil, Goulart's plan was shelved because of lack of internal political support for such an ambitious move. His next action was to order his finance minister to apply a limit on the amount of net profits that foreign companies would be allowed to take out of the country, and then he asserted control over foreign aid. Up to that point much of it was being poured into favored states within Brazil, but Goulart mandated that it must first be channeled through the federal government. These were all policies aimed at improving the general welfare of the Brazilian people, but they conflicted with the profit motives of the American Establishment.

Goulart also turned his attention to the United States' largest producer of iron ore, the M.A. Hanna Mining Company, that had a major presence in Brazil. Hanna was the main iron ore supplier of National Steel, which in turn supplied 40% of Chrysler Corporation's steel, and all three companies were highly invested in by the Rockefeller family. In 1962 President Goulart issued an expropriation decree against Hanna's iron ore concession. It was appealed in the Brazilian courts by Hanna's CEO George Humphrey, but by early 1964 it looked as if Goulart's decree would be passed. JFK was out of the way, and the time had come for the Establishment to act.

No time was wasted because Humphrey was a firm Establishment insider. He had previously been Eisenhower's Treasury secretary, and his company's law firm was Milbank and Tweed, the law firm of John J. McCloy. "The Chairman" then took control of the Goulart situation during the very same time that he was beginning his work with the Warren Commission on the JFK assassination. McCloy would work to cover up the successful American coup at the same time as he planned for a Brazilian coup, and as these two tasks began President Lyndon Johnson awarded him the Freedom Medal at a White House ceremony in the State Dining Room.

Biographer Kai Bird describes how McCloy took command,

McCloy quickly set about educating himself on the situation by seeing all the appropriate officials at the State Department, the World Bank, the IMF, and the CIA. As it happened, one of the men he had worked with in Germany after the war, Lincoln Gordon, was now the U.S. Ambassador to Brazil. Gordon was back in Washington temporarily that week and gave McCloy his own highly pessimistic assessment of the situation...
In preparation for the worst, McCloy set up a channel of communication between the CIA and Hanna's man, Buford . Thereafter, whenever Buford returned from one of his frequent trips to Rio de Janeiro, he would drive out to the CIA's headquarters in Langley, Virginia, for a debriefing. According to Buford, McCloy also arranged for him to meet periodically with the CIA station chief in Rio. "Through this fellow," recalled Buford, "we had many, many meetings with the military people who were opposing Goulart behind the scenes."

Bird relates that on February 28 McCloy flew out to Rio de Janeiro to meet with President Goulart. In his pocket he had two proposals to settle the dispute between Hanna Mining and the Brazilian government. Goulart readily agreed to both of the proposals and promised to set up a meeting between Hanna officials and government representatives to work out the deal. Goulart felt greatly relieved at this turn of events, but he had no way of knowing that the proposals were never meant to be lived up to. Several days later Goulart pressed on with his reforming agenda, announcing at a rally his plans to nationalize "all private oil refineries and some landholdings."

At the same time the powerful anti-Goulart opposition shifted into a higher gear. Demonstrations for and against Goulart took place throughout Brazil and tensions escalated. Bird writes,

Hanna officials were now very worried. Back in their Cleveland headquarters, Humphrey and Buford considered sending McCloy down to Rio once again. But McCloy knew from his contacts in the intelligence community that the time for deal making was over. On March 27, 1964, Colonel Walters cabled Washington that General Castello Branco had "finally accepted leadership" of the anti-Goulart "plotters." Three days later, he told Ambassador Gordon that a military coup was "imminent." The following morning, Washington's contingency plan for a Brazilian coup, code-named Operation Brother Sam, was activated as a U.S. naval-carrier task force was ordered to station itself off the Brazilian coast. Well before the coup began, the Brazilian generals were told that the U.S. Navy would provide them with both arms and scarce oil.
The Goulart regime, however, collapsed so quickly that the protracted civil war predicted by the CIA on March 31 never developed. The generals who planned and executed the coup did not need the arms or oil supplies waiting for them off the coast. Hanna Mining Company, in fact, ended up giving the generals more direct assistance than did Operation Brother Sam. The initial army revolt occurred in Minais Gerais, the state in which Hanna had its mining concession. When these troops began marching on Rio, some of them rode in Hanna trucks. In Rio itself, Jack Buford was in constant touch with the local CIA station chief, who kept him informed by phone on Goulart's movements.

Throughout President Goulart's brief term he was continually labeled a "Communist" by much of the Brazilian elite, by a large segment of its military and by the Establishment-controlled mass media in the United States. The hysteria was so effective that a year later the House of Representatives took as credible the testimony of US Southern Command General Andrew O'Meara, who stated, "The coming to power of the Castelo Branco government in Brazil last April saved that country from an immediate dictatorship which could only have been followed by Communist domination."
http://www.redmoonrising.com/AmericanBabyl...m#Brazil%2...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now back to RFK in Brazil in 1965:

But whatever Rockefeller gained for Standard Oil was undermined when Senator Kennedy arrived. Kennedy's comments about
Standard Oil's recalcitrance were published in the Peruvian Press.

"So then, why don't you act?" Kennedy reportedly asked the Peruvians.

"Because pressures exist which involve the power of IPC and the problems of credit badly needed by the country," one of them
repleid. "In some way, if you will pardon the expression, it could be said to blackmail"

Kennedy stayed on the offensive, challenging the Peruvians to act for themselves:

In the conversation I had with the students at the Perucian-American Cultural Institute
I heard many complaints and criticisms, but not once was I told about what they thought
or what they supposed should be done in this or that problem. I think that the action is up
to you people. President Kennedy had to act against some large American firms; Argentina
has cancelled its oil contracts; years ago Mexico nationalized its oil, and what happened?
It is up to you not to get overwhelmed and to act according to your interests and according
with what you consider is more convenient. And nothing can happen, as nothing happened
before

The authors do not make RFK seem like the leftist that he wasn't. Yet they also capture his own senes of how different the Latin American
policy of the 'the Kennedy's' was from the direct investment, more clearly unilateral policies of LBJ and Nelson Rockefeller: Did RFK's
perception of these differeneces reflect a real division within the US ruling class or a fatal naivity on the part of an indoctrinated Cold Warrior
who was, nevertheless, subject to change:

Kennedy's belief that in the United States democratic government already prevailed over privilege was unshaken. "Do you
really believe," he asked, "that the enterprises and companies have so large an influence here and so much political
influence over the US Government? During President Kennedy's administration, businessmen did not enter the White House.
My trip to Latin America was certainly not looked on with favor by the State Department. But from what you people tell me,
I can say again that it is up to you to change things ifthey are as you said"

"And how about the Marines? asked one man, referring to the recent Dominican intervention.

"Surely, you are not aware, Mr. Kennedy," said another, "that not long ago Mr. Rockefeller said in Lima that future financing is
conditional to the favorable solution to the problems of the IPC and the International Telephone Company

Kennedy's face tensed. "And what importance do you give to this kind of threat? We Kennedy's, we eat Rockefellers for Breakfast"

The US Embassy in Lima asked Kennedy "for a statement clarifying" his view. Kennedy refused either to denounce the Peruvians of to
retract his statements. "Someone at the gathering leaked the incident to the press," Kennedy aide Richard Goodwin later told Rockefeller
family historians Peter Colier and David Horowitz, "and it got around. When we stopped in Argentina, a reporter rushed up to Bobby
and said Johnson Administration] "Senator, is it true that you have breakfast with Rockefeller every morning?"

The Johnson White House was not amused. "The stories have him in effect saying:'Go ahead and nationalize. Others (Argentina,
Brazil, Mexico) have done this. In the end, things work out," William Bowdler reported to National Security Adivsor McGeorge
Bundy. "I don't see that there is anything that we can do about the episode, Bowdler, concluded.

Lyndon Johnson disagreed. Something could be done.

Kennedy's views on the Dominican Republic and on Peru won him no praise in Room 5600 < Nelson's bunker in Rockefeller Center>.
Neither did his damning of Apartheid in South Africa as an evil comparable to "discriminatin in New York, serfdom in Peru, starvation
in India mass slaughter in Indonesia, and the Jailing of intellectuals in the Soviet Union" David Rockefeller was the most active American
banker promoting financial ties with South Africa (Thy Will Be Done, pp. 540-541)

Amy Goodman might imply that RFK was the same as LBJ. Rockefeller knew they wern't, and funds her, into eternity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
vstein7 Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. ex nazi von Steinbeck
Hi, is there anyway you could give me a lot of information about this "von Steinbeck"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
scholarsOrAcademics Donating Member (194 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. reading history
for me is "alive" Its a little dismaying the tone that reading history is not alive. I have just read the Diary of William E. Dodd, Ambassador to Germany from 1933 to 1938. He is constantly complaining that Ambassador so and so does not know his history. Dodd was a History professor. I am not convinced he knew enough history, particularly about Bismarck and the Prussians.
I'm looking for a good book on Otto Von Bismarck. And I'm wondering how much agreement among historians is justifiably grounded.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Nov 26th 2014, 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Books: Non-Fiction Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC