Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

JUDGE MAY ALLOW LEGAL CHALLENGE TO BLOCK BUSH ELECTORAL VOTES IN NEVADA

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Karenca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 10:23 AM
Original message
JUDGE MAY ALLOW LEGAL CHALLENGE TO BLOCK BUSH ELECTORAL VOTES IN NEVADA
Edited on Tue Nov-30-04 10:50 AM by Karenca
By SCOTT SONNER
Associated Press Writer

RENO, Nev. (AP) -- A judge intends to decide Tuesday whether to allow a legal challenge to move forward aimed at blocking Nevada's five electoral votes from being cast next month for President Bush.

Washoe County District Judge Peter Breen said Monday he's considering setting an evidentiary hearing to determine whether there are grounds to keep the votes from Bush - who carried Nevada by 21,500 votes - due to allegations of voter registration fraud and claims some voting machines malfunctioned.

Breen said he'd issue a written ruling Tuesday on a motion to dismiss the case based in part on arguments that it is a moot point given that Bush won nationally by a margin of 34 electoral votes, 286-252. He heard lawyers' arguments on the matter for about 2.5 hours Monday.

The Nevada Supreme Court formally canvassed the vote last week and Secretary of State Dean Heller, a Republican, certified the results.

"The train has left the station and the results could not possibly change," said Rew Goodenow, a lawyer representing the five Republican electors scheduled to cast Nevada's votes Dec. 13.

"The winner in this election has been declared under the laws of the state of Nevada," he told Breen in urging the case be thrown out.

"Elections have one endearing and wonderful quality - the quality of finality. At some point the election has to be final. This one is, and the court ought not meddle with that," Goodenow said.

Breen acknowledged "the issue of mootness" was an important question.

"As the electoral vote stands, there is no way this court can affect the outcome," he said.

But Jeff Dickerson, a Reno lawyer representing those contesting the election results, said that even if Nevada's electoral votes don't impact the national election "it does make a difference to Nevada."

"President Bush is claiming he has a mandate and included in that is that the state of Nevada stood behind him. Even if Nevada's five electoral votes will not change the election, it does have an impact on whether Nevada is part of that mandate," Dickerson said.

`If there are disenfranchised voters who were illegally disenfranchised ... then those voters are not having their will voiced," he said.

Rick Newell Davis of Minden filed the formal contest of the election results earlier this month. He said thousands of Nevadans may have been denied the right to vote Nov. 2 because of registration problems and should still be allowed to cast ballots.

The challenge names the GOP electors as defendants - Joe Brown and Milton Schwartz of Las Vegas, John Marvel of Battle Mountain, Bev Willard of Carson City and Paul Willis of Pahrump.

Both major parties elect their party's electors at their state conventions prior to the election, and the winning party's electors are bound by state law to cast the electoral votes for the candidate who carried Nevada.

Bush won 418,690 votes in Nevada (50.5 percent) to Kerry's 397,190 (47.9 percent). Bush also narrowly won Nevada in 2000 after Democrat Bill Clinton had won twice before.

Davis said many Nevadans were deprived of the right to vote as a result of activities by a voter registration organization financed by the Republican National Committee.

Some former workers for Voter Outreach of America, operated by Sproul and Associates of Phoenix, who registered voters in Nevada and other battleground states have alleged they were told to register only Republicans and to ignore pro-Kerry people. Some said that completed Democratic registration forms were thrown out or ripped up.

The head of the company, Nathan Sproul - a former Christian Coalition activist and one-time executive director of the Arizona GOP - has denied any wrongdoing.

Goodenow said Monday there is no legal avenue under state law for Breen to reopen voting in Nevada.

Only the Nevada Legislature has the authority to set the time for statewide elections, he said. Therefore, if Breen grants the challenge, it likely would result only in a nullification of the election results in Nevada, Goodenow said.

"The potential result would be simply awful - that Nevada votes would not count in the electoral college," he said.

"Nevada would have no voice in this presidential election."
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/N/NV_ELECTION_CONTEST_1ST_LD_WRITETHRU_NVOL-?SITE=NVREN&SECTION=HOME
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. if our election in Nevada can't prove its integrity ...then its electoral
votes should be pitched out!!! And with the lies it told nationwide about having all paper trails statewie when it wasn't true ...there has to be more to this cow and its cabbage and how it ate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. Your subject line is misleading. We will know if he does that when his
decision is released.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I changed it..------nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Thanks.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Us vs Them Donating Member (725 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. Republicans say "The train has already left the station."
And all the Republicans are on board. Grinning and waving from the back of the caboose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. All of the freepublicans are mooning us
Edited on Tue Nov-30-04 10:45 AM by Pithy Cherub
from all of their cushiony red velvet seats on the train to HELL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Uh-oh, donkeys on the tracks ahead, watch out for derailment
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. didn't "Katherine" Blackwell use that phrase?
Is this a new republican meme? They must have a factory somewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doremus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
9. If only Ohio judges had the same balls...
...the freepers would be crying a different tune.

Unfortunately our Ohio judges care nothing about the law, only seeing that their next king is installed. They didn't pad their pockets enough his first 4 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseFawn Donating Member (101 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. They will this time.
Have you seen all the money that will be flowing into Ohio soon?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC