Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is the Patriot Act Being Used to Silence Democratic Leadership?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
truehawk Donating Member (797 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 01:28 AM
Original message
Is the Patriot Act Being Used to Silence Democratic Leadership?
Edited on Sat Nov-27-04 02:08 AM by truehawk
I had this thought when I was reading Madsen's update.

I can see Kerry being quite, I had knowledge of him before only as a money laundering sleuth. I can see how Edwards would be very worried and busy with two small children and a sick wife.
But that does not explain the silence of the Dean, or the Sharpton. Silence from them is definitely out of character.

The only thing that I can think of to explain the silence and acquiescence of our usually feisty Leadership is that they have been told not to make waves that would interfere with an ongoing "Homeland Security" investigation.

Perhaps they have been told that it is likely that there has been widespread tampering of the election results, paid for by a foreign power, and that they are to do nothing that would alarm the perps sp they will be lulled so they will not completely clean the evidence before the investigators get there.

There are gag rules in the Patriot Act that subject a person to criminal penalties if they disclose that there is an investigation or that a request has been made for Records. I wonder if there are likewise gag rules about disclosing that an investigation is underway.

So there are "leaks" here and there about FBI activity.

However what if there real FBI investigation, but to be conducted over a very long period of time.

The Patroit Act could be used to muzzle the Dems until 2008 in Bush's America.

That Act Does NOT BELONG IN A DEMOCRACY!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. Madsen has been interviewed over and over as an expert on
security issues, especially on his protests that the FBI, CIA and other law enforcement and investigations arms already had the capability to "spy" on alleged criminal activity and did not need the "Patriot Act."

Just do a google like this

Wayne Madsen National Security Agency

Literally hundreds of references of Madsen over the past ten years speaking and writing on the issue. This guy is not a dumb hack at all.

If Kerry and the others are aware that something is truly dirty, they would be smart to let some like Madsen leak it out instead of themselves.

Besides, Madsen also could be getting his info on the disgruntled "techs" from pissed off CIA and FBI members. Remember who was "leaking" info about Bush before the election?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truehawk Donating Member (797 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I don't disagree with anything you have said NV writer
Nor do I take issue with the fact that Wayne Madsen is known and creditable and has reported on some pretty dirty government laundry before.

I am not saying that he is part of the Scam.
However, it occured to me that IF there is an FBI investigation ongoing, and IF it involves something that can be tortured and twisted to fit into the Patroit Act's broad perview, then the provisions of that act could be used to effectively prohibit comment until "Whoops" it is 2008. Because they want to ignore the little fish to get the big guy you know.

And I am not sure it would be illegal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. You are onto somethign
When people ask I usually say, remmeber them Anthrax Attacks and WHO precisely it affected?


That is the free clue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnIndependentTexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. it is interesting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
regularjoe Donating Member (358 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. It would sure be nice to know though. Its hard to wait in suspense
for a long time.

regularjoe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberty Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Someone should ask Dean & Sharpton.
If it's not true, they'd deny it. If it is true, you'd get a no comment. So either way, we'd know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mirwib Donating Member (95 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Good point
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-04 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
8. I've Been Thinking Something Like This Too For The Past Few Days
That the reason for Kerry's fast concession and dead silence from all the Dem players, suggests that something along the lines of an FBI investigation is underway.

I was thinking, though, that both Kerry and Bushco know there was fraud, that they have been talking about it, and that this Dem silence is part of an agreement to let this investigation proceed.

I didn't get to the point in my thinking that the election fraud was the result of action from a foreign power, however.

As far as I got, was that both Kerry and Bushco know Kerry won, both the Electoral votes and the popular vote, and are onworking a way to avoid a constitutional crisis and/or civil unrest.

If Kerry is inaugurated in January, it would support my thinking. However, if Bush is inaugurated in January, then it seems that this whole mystery goes another level or two deeper.

Anyone who remembers the way the Iran-Contra affair unfolded, will remember how it was like an onion, where layer, after layer of lies were peeled back until we finally got an idea of what happened. Although, most Americans never did fully grasp what happened, not unlike the 2000 election, or 9/11 so far. AND, Poppy was elected after Reagan anyway.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pam-Moby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-04 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Silence
I to have been perplexed in all of the silence. I hope that someone of prominence starts speaking to bring the matter into the mainstream of the media. I also have spent time searching the web for foreign news items pertaining to fraud in our election process. Strangely I could not find anything on all of the sites I viewed. As if nothing here is being questioned. Although I did find numerous articles praising that Bush was reelected. Strange!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trayfoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-04 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. hummmmm
Sorry, guys. I have lost all faith that ANYTHING is being done to investigate the fraud in this election. I have tried my best to hold on to whatever sliver of hope there was. I see none, at this point in time. If I am proven wrong - I'll be more than happy to eat my words and do "penance" for the democratic party. I just can't see how any of this will be exposed in any meaningful way - and I see us approaching 08 with the same bullshit system we have today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truehawk Donating Member (797 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-04 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. If anything is going to get done FOR SURE I think it is going to be by US


Grottos

Does Va have an itnative process, could you put a verified voter petition on the ballot there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
consciousobjector Donating Member (173 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-04 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. trayfoot...don't surrender yet...
I have many moments of feeling the way you do too...it's been a really frustrating time for everyone. But we can't give up. If we do, we guarantee * success.
Keep the Faith! Truth WILL reveal. It took a long, long time for Nixon to get his...but in the end, he did...* will too
:pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pam-Moby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-04 02:54 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. black out!
Lets hope this does not happen ever again. Look what happened to Clinton and the story from starr, it was plastered all over the net and news. Now know one in the world wants to touch our election issues. Odd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-04 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. Hi Pam-Moby!
Welcome to DU! :hi:

I'm not sure what foreign web news items you found, but I saw very little "relief" over * being re-selected. In fact, what I saw was shock and utter bewilderment that so many Americans supposedly voted for the moran.



-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pam-Moby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-04 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Thanks for the welcome
I did see a few of places on the web where they felt we must ignorant. But I did not find anything about our voting problems here in the US
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suziedemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. Maybe Bush knows - but wasn't in on it ????
Edited on Wed Dec-01-04 05:34 PM by suziedemocrat
They said Karl Rove was crying the day of the election telling Bush how he'd let him down and Karen Hughes was sure they had lost. Is it possible there was fraud - but Bush, Rove, and Hughes weren't involved? I think Bush STILL looks like he was the loser. His eyes look very sad.

Of course .... I thought Monica made all that stuff about Bill Clinton up to impress her friend Linda Tripp. I was sure Clinton was telling the truth when he said "I did not have sex with that woman." I haven't trusted my instincts since. :-(

My initial thought was they thought maybe they could "fix" a very close election.  I think they had things in the works - but they were obviously untested - and I don't think it could have been that well organized, for obvious reasons.  The exit polls showed a clear Kerry win.  I think on election day they saw the polls so decisively for Kerry and figured it was way beyond what they could "fix".   I think they were as surprised as anyone that it worked so well.   I thought they put some ideas out to try - and they were surprised it went so well.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Technowitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-04 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
12. The Democratic Party -has- leadership?
You coulda fooled me.

A gamed election, and they're all rolling over and begging Master George's boys to keep on whipping them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dewaldd Donating Member (185 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-04 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
16. The FBI is probably in on it. Don't expect any real investigation.
The Patriot Act would be a muzzle--let people expect that something is happening when it is not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quakerfriend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. What's so odd is
Edited on Wed Dec-01-04 05:40 PM by libertybelle
the silence accross the board. When have we ever known Al Sharpton to be quiet.........even if he faced jail time?? And, M. Moore, too? In some small way it still gives me hope that things are happening behind the scenes for the good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC