Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NY: This county knows who won (Does YOURS?)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Bill Bored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 03:20 AM
Original message
NY: This county knows who won (Does YOURS?)
Edited on Tue Dec-28-10 03:22 AM by Bill Bored
http://www.columbiapaper.com/index.php/editor/1698-by-v...

Your vote counts: This county knows who won
Written by VIRGINIA MARTIN
Friday, 17 December 2010


WITHOUT CONFIDENCE in our elections, is this really a democracy?

When you hear about suspect elections in one country or another, what do you assume? That it's not a democracy. We know we're a democracy when we can trust our elections.

This year, the first in which every single vote was cast on a paper ballot, Columbia County hand-counted each and every one. Before the election, Commissioner Jason Nastke and I ordered a full hand count so that our county's voters could have complete confidence in the vote totals that we'd certify after the election. Who could distrust hand counts that are done by teams of Democrats and Republicans, with one looking over the shoulder of the other every step of the way?

Columbia is the only county that did this, though. Other counties conducted an audit of 3% of their voting machines, which is the minimum required by our new state election law. (If a certain number of machine errors are found, the audit must escalate to 8%; then, if more errors are found, to 20%, and potentially to 100%.)

There's a world of difference between 3% and 100%, and we're not just talking about the time involved or the cost of hiring ballot counters. The key difference is that, with our 100% audit, we commissioners and this county's voting public can have unparalleled confidence in our results.

-snip-

But competent statisticians and audit experts will tell you that New York State's 3% audit doesn't provide anything near that high degree of confidence.

A 3% audit would have us hand-count all the ballots from just two machines (randomly selected) of the 45 we deployed countywide on Election Day.

-snip-

Absent a 100% audit, election law provides protection, of sorts, to a losing candidate who's skeptical of the results. The candidate can go before a judge to get a court order to have all the ballots hand counted. But there are no guarantees. In Nassau County's 7th Senate District race, with a difference of only 451 votes out of the more than 85,000 ballots cast, the judge rejected the loser's request.

-snip-

Virginia Martin is the Democratic commissioner of the Columbia County Board of Elections.
Refresh | +8 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
IntravenousDemilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 03:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. So she's not this woman, then...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Bill Bored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. No, and this is not her either:
Edited on Tue Dec-28-10 06:11 PM by Bill Bored
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Bill Bored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. You can read more about her here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. setting an example to be proud of
she's got backbone and wisdom
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
emlev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. Here's another quote from Commissioner Martin
"Im responsible, along with my counterpart, for the accuracy of the vote count, and when I certify an election, Im attesting that the results are accurate. It would be the height of irresponsibility for me to certify results if I couldnt understand, examine, or feel confident in the vote-counting mechanism employed. And I have no reason to be confident about a software-based tabulation of secret ballots. The software might contain an inadvertent error or it might have been hackedyet in neither case would I necessarily be aware that there was a problem."

Another one of her blog entries is also linked from:

The Election Official Who Wouldn't
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-11 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yup. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Aug 28th 2014, 02:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC