NY: "Since I don’t understand how the machine can record the votes...I did not feel confident"
A Voter Critiques the New Machines By LYNN BRENNER
Lynn Brenner, a friend of City Room, sent around an e-mail describing her voting experience in New York City on Tuesday and contrasting it with her experiences of past years. This follows a primary day that prompted many complaints. We thought it smartly summed up the experiences of many, and we happily present it here:
The inherent flaws and initial spotty performance of the new New York City voting system have already been denounced by Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, who spoke for just about everyone who voted yesterday.
Here is my firsthand report.
First, a brief description of the old system:
When you pulled the lever, there was a clicking sound, and an X appeared in the box next to the candidate’s name. If you had mistakenly pulled the wrong lever, or had second thoughts, you pulled it back. The X disappeared, and you could begin again.
When you were satisfied with your selection — (I use the word “satisfied” loosely, of course) — you cast your vote by pulling the giant handle again. With a big ka-ching! sound not unlike the theme of “Law & Order,” your vote was cast: The X’s disappeared (ensuring its secrecy) and the curtain behind you opened.
So here’s the new system:
You fill in the little circles (like the SAT test, only less legible). You then put your ballot inside the “privacy folder” and walk to one of the scanners — which look something like a Xerox machine, but not as comfortingly familiar — where a friendly poll watcher helps you cast your vote. The immediate question is, “Do I put in my ballot face up or face down?” In my case, the poll watcher said, “It doesn’t matter.” So I put it in face down, to conceal my vote. It went into the machine, which then flashed the message, “Your vote has been counted.”
Since I don’t understand how the machine can record the votes regardless of whether the ballot is inserted facing up or down, I did not feel confident this was true.
2. mine got rejected because it didn't come out of the folder smoothly..
I had to run it again. I did notice that those special pens. If your ballot is still wet the ink will leave marks in the folder, which can make spurious markings on your ballot. I think older people are goingto have trouble loading the ballots.
the scanners are designed to read both sides of the ballot.
In the general election there may be too many offices, candidates and propositions to fit on one side, so the back of the ballot will be used. The scanner has to be able to read the back so it can scan in one pass, and the ballot is coded so that the scanner knows what is being read. So, it makes no difference which way you put the ballot in.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.